What ajai shukla is saying is that the lca intake have a tough time getting to 28 degrees because the inlets could choke. He may be wrong to quote the 50 degrees but he is crystal clear about that point.
It would be wrong to take one point lamnast him for it to accidents hide the crux of the matter.
I do not understand what the “special” in the IAF’s special operations Hercules is it something to do with how the aft doors are set up so as to allow parachutes out?
I dont know why each time i think of a hercules for special operations I think of the MC-130
No. Not enough local infrastructure, & the ‘better reach’ only applies if you’re heading towards the Malacca Strait. It’s a lot further away from the sea routes carrying most of Indias oil imports, for example, than a mainland base.
You can’t hide a nuclear submarine base, so there’s no point wasting effort trying. Just make sure it’s well-guarded.
Fair points..I have a few other questions but best not to ask..
Two more Water Jet Propelled Fast Attack Craft to join Navy
Are these replacements to the old Indian Navy missile boats that caused karnage in 1970’s?
By far the gripen is possibly the best choice for the IAF when people compare operating costs you always forget about cost of airstrips etc. and that is correct because you always expect an airfield to be there.
But one thing the Gripen has up its sleeve is the ability to operate from standard tarmac which means you can start thinking about flying from green field sites away from main bases. Main bases which are susceptible to first strike from irbms and surface to surface missiles.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKkbjY63_1s
Video or marketing video of NETRA, seen a few of these types of UAVs around now. Should be good for coin ops.
One that i do wonder is if the video feed can be hacked into. The militants have been doing that in Afghanistan and Iraq apparently.
Read the bit which says internal weapons carriage.
Page 3, Part 3. Payloads – Internal weapons bay.
I see your point and i am sure the IAF would love to have the X-47 or neuron but i think at this stage they are fishing, they have sat around and asked for a wide margin of items. What actually gets offered up and what can be afforded will be different.
i read the list but obviously saw it in a different light
Read the RFI there is nothing in there which says that it has to specifically be a stealthy UCAV like a nEUROn or X47. They call for something with a low RCS, where RCS is not defined and it is a relative term in a wish list.
Sounds very interesting..
How many alternatives to the MQ-9 are out there in the world?
From times of India
Looks like the IAF really like the MKI, wonder why they do not want any Su-35’s to fly and try?
NEW DELHI: The Cabinet Committee on Security earlier this month quietly cleared one of the biggest defence orders of recent times.
The almost Rs 15,000 crore order for an additional 42 Sukhoi-30 MKI fighters would add up the total number of these modern Russian fighters for Indian Air Force to 272.
When the entire Sukhoi-30 MKIs, including the 42, are delivered to IAF by around 2018, it would become the single largest type of fighters in service, marking a huge technological transition from the dominance of MIG-21 fighters today.
A senior official said the CCS cleared the new order in the first week of June.
By the time HAL begins manufacture of the 42 aircraft sometime in 2014, each of them would cost in the range of Rs 350 crore, according to present day projections.
The new order for Sukhoi-30 MKIs comes even as attention is fully on the tender floated by the Air Force for $10 billion worth 126 MMRCA (medium multi role combat aircraft). But by the time the MMRCA enters the service, it would be the Sukhoi-30 MKI that would actually be the dominant fighter of the Air Force. And the combined contract value of SU-30 MKIs would be more than double that of the MMRCA.
The Su-30 MKI was originally contracted in 1996, when the Russian military-industrial complex was in a shambles after the Soviet Union collapsed. Its design and capabilities, however, continues to impress globally.
The initial contract was for 50 fighters, at $1.46 billion. Over the years, the numbers kept increasing. In 2000, the government contracted the licenced production of 140 of these highly advanced fighters by the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited. Then another 40 were added to the contract.
The present order for 42 fighters was originally supposed to be 40, but two more were added to the order book to make up for the two crashed fighters. A senior official said that HAL is expected to complete all the SU-30 MKI orders by 2016-17 period.
HAL has been steadily stepping up its Sukhoi-30 MKI delivery schedules. While last year it delivered 23 of these fighters, this year it is expected to produce 28. HAL has already supplied 74 of these fighters.
http://www.economist.com/node/16295552
Interesting article nothing too new..
THE West has some formidable missiles designed to sink warships. Three of the most deadly are America’s Harpoon, France’s Exocet and the Swedish RBS-15. These all fly close to the speed of sound for up to about 200km (124 miles) using precision-guidance systems to skim over land or water. This makes them difficult to detect. And even if they are spotted, the missiles can fly in unpredictable patterns, which makes it harder to shoot them down. They then punch a warhead, weighing as much as 200kg (440lbs), into a moving ship with devastating consequences.
Despite all this, missile defences can be effective. Shooting at missiles with rapid-firing guns, or anti-missile missiles, can bring them down. The incoming missile’s electronics can also be scrambled with blasts of electromagnetic radiation, such as microwaves. And decoys can be fired to trick the missile’s homing sensors and lure it away from the vessel under attack. But missile attacks on ships are rare, so it is difficult to know just how safe a ship really is—especially if an attacker launches a dozen or so missiles at once.
One particular anti-ship missile has become especially worrying for Western defence chiefs. This is because it is even more fearsome than anything NATO countries and their allies now use. The Russian-made missile is called the Club and it can carry bigger warheads farther than any anti-ship missile the West can launch.
Not even sure why this is being reported! I hope the real base is a few thousand miles away some place else.
even if you could buy shares wouldnt the technology blocks still apply?
I think it is highly unlikely. LM claims it will cost $60M. Most people don’t believe them. LM would still have to fight with congress just to get them to sell the F-35 to India at all, let alone with the ToT India is requesting. I think the F-16 is out of the question too because of likely unimpressive performance in comparison to its peers, its failure at Leh, and the fact that Pakistan also flies the F-16. And there will probably be ToT troubles with the F-16IN too due to the AESA radar.
Add to this that the Arabian countries also fly the f16 block 60 and that India in the future will most likely have border tensions I’m the north and the north have had access to f 16s for years.
Has Sukhoi released any other details about the T-50 ?