dark light

EELightning

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 2,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2285563
    EELightning
    Participant

    That’s meant to hide the exact number of TRMs from public eyes, albeit the ballpark is already publicly known.;)

    Yes, so one has to wonder if the figure is a little higher than previously mentioned. πŸ˜€

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2285723
    EELightning
    Participant

    Ta very much, Scorpion. My lack of keeping up to date is showing somewhat. πŸ˜›

    It’s rather interesting how we’re not seeing the antenna of Captor-E at Farnborough…

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2285782
    EELightning
    Participant

    Will these improvements to Typhoon cause a change to the mark number? Ie F(GA)4 to 4A or 5?

    Tr1 to Tr2 to Tr3 didn’t, so I’m guessing ‘no’ at this point.

    While Tranches have provisions for certain upgrades for Captor-E and Conformal Fuel Tanks & the like, they’re basically just three separate production batches, or technically four if you include Tranche 3B – which is just a second batch to the overall Tranche 3 lot, the first obviously being Tranche 3A. Providing the former are purchased that is.

    FGRx covers everything the Typhoon is, or will be capable of. Where the ‘4’ comes from I’m unsure, possibly to compliment the GR4 figure for Tornado. The figure will more than likely change during a MLU, however. Before Typhoon received the Austere A/G capability (Tranche 1) they were known as Typhoon F2.

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2286086
    EELightning
    Participant

    Something went really wrong there.

    This is what happens when two amateur sides with itchy trigger fingers are let loose with equipment that is much too complicated for them to operate. Reading the manual first rather than using/firing the system then posting a Tweet stating; ‘It works’ (which coincidently was removed soon after) afterwards, is very unprofessional, at best.

    Such a waste of life for nothing. R.I.P and condolences to all those involved.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2286246
    EELightning
    Participant

    Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH today (July 17th) confirmed that NETMA, the NATO Eurofighter and Tornado Management Agency, has placed an order with it to integrate the Storm Shadow long range attack missile onto the Eurofighter Typhoon.

    Representatives from NETMA, Eurofighter, and the four core nations of the Eurofighter Programme (the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain and Germany) convened for the Contract Signing Ceremony in the Eurofighter Pavilion at the Farnborough Air Show on Thursday.

    Under the terms of what is known as a β€˜Contract 4’ order from NETMA, Eurofighter will work with the three Eurofighter Partner Companies (BAE Systems, Airbus Space & Defence, and Alenia Aermacchi) and their supply base – including MBDA, the makers of the Storm Shadow missile – to integrate the weapon on the aircraft. The Contract will form part of what is known as the P2E enhancement package. Flight trials with Storm Shadow on Typhoon have been progressing since late 2013 and, working with Eurofighter operators, we expect to deliver an operational capability in line with their requirements.

    /

    In the deep attack role Eurofighter Typhoon will carry two Storm Shadow missiles whilst maintaining the ability to carry 8 air-air missiles. This will enable Eurofighter Typhoon to fight its way in and out of the combat area.

    http://www.eurofighter.com/news-and-events/2014/07/eurofighter-and-netma-sign-storm-shadow-integration-contract

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2286781
    EELightning
    Participant

    Its a shame really, I miss the arguments about Typhoon being without an AESA and having no prospect of A2G effectiveness….

    Wow, really? There’s little worse than seeing a bunch of sad morons supporting the “other type” drone on about an aircraft they loathe (or secretly admire) not having certain capabilities. I’m glad I have more to do to in life.

    At the end of the day, it comes down to common sense and being realistic. Typhoon was always going to get these capabilities, the speculative question(s) was when.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2287365
    EELightning
    Participant

    And got pasted by Rafale and gripen.

    Of course it [Typhoon] did, because you have access to every single engagement that has ever taken place…

    EELightning
    Participant

    I suppose this the place to post this bit of news.

    David Cameron appointed Michael Fallon as Defence Secretary on Tuesday as part of a major reshuffle of his cabinet ahead of a national election in May next year.

    Fallon earlier this year suggested that Cameron’s Conservative party should campaign for Britain to leave the European Union if a planned renegotiation of ties proved unsuccessful.

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/07/15/uk-britain-politics-defence-idUKKBN0FK0TV20140715

    I somehow doubt Fallon has a positive outlook for the UK to share work with other European countries, or having to have a “partnership” with the French for next 50 years.

    Foresee the future to have a spanner in the works, one does. As Yoda would say… Probably…

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2287699
    EELightning
    Participant

    Anyway last time i check UK gonna use F-35 for A2G and Typhoon for A2A so i don’t see the prob with T1 Typhoon.?

    I don’t think I’ve ever heard that the UK wanted to use the F-35B for A/G and the Typhoon for A/A, if I did it was most certainly a very long time ago and probably not from a very reliable source. The Typhoon was always planned to have A/G capabilities in RAF service.

    in reply to: stupid question #2288168
    EELightning
    Participant

    JF-17
    T-50
    Gripen
    Tejas

    … how many more do you want?

    F-35… Ohh…

    :dev2:

    EELightning
    Participant

    Just thought, with regards to the Repositioner there was some mention a short while ago of a Double-Repositioner which gives a much wider field of regard than the former does which is approximately 200-220 degrees. One does wonder if the latter is still in the minds of the boffins…

    EELightning
    Participant

    To be honest I’m surprised the Sentinel has survived for a few more years regardless of the threats. The UK MoD think about savings first, threats at a very distant second. See Nimrod amongst many other programmes.

    In other news I think is interesting, not military aviation but hey, the Challenger 2 tank is be kept in service until 2035+. That’s if the MoD/Government don’t do another U-turn.

    With the retirement of Tornado GR4, which isn’t really that long away, and uncertainty of the entry into service date of the F-35B and of course how many, the Typhoon was always going to be introduced to new capabilities. We’re probably not going to hear much coming out of Farnborough, although I’m suspecting we’re going to hear one or two other pieces of positive news. The biggest news is going to come from SDSR ’15, both positive and negative.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2288341
    EELightning
    Participant

    I’ve not got much of an idea what you’re on about, Tomcat… But, yeah… Didgeridoo-Didgeridoo…

    Indeed, good news about Captor-E, if you’re the RAF or even the RSAF. It would help if the three other consortium members chipped in, other than that, just a bit of good news.

    EELightning
    Participant

    Well… I wouldn’t get excited. Concerns have already been raised about where the money has come from, one area is where the government have previously underspent, some of the capabilities that are “being replaced” are actually the same ones the government themselves cut in the last defence review in 2010, i.e. Sentinel, special forces were cut, now they’re being increased.

    Excellent news for Captor-E, until one thinks about it a little harder thus the Excellent bit is replaced by, just ‘Good’, because now that the UK have officially(?) committed funding for the Captor-E, well lets just say it’s pretty old news, the UK have been committed to the radar for quite a while now if one wants to be pedantic and bring up the likes of another AESA demonstrator (Black Archer) and have been progressing with Captor-E for a bit now. Things get underwhelming with regards to the three other Eurofighter GmbH consortium members, as of now they haven’t hinted at anything with regards to funding towards the radar… While that their commitment would indeed help one does wonder if the announcement from the UK would be significant enough with regards to export, Saudi Arabia will almost certainly follow the UK’s lead but still, one must wonder.

    To summarise; Parliament have just gone back on their words (albeit positively) and have boasted by saying, ‘Yaaay look at us, we’ve announced significant defence spending, aren’t we great! Go us!’

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2288685
    EELightning
    Participant

    Are they really saying that the present Eurofighter doesn’t have “the sort of “knife-fight in a phone box turning” capability enjoyed by rivals such as the F/A 18E/F or LM F 18″?

    Are Orange Amplification known for having their products to be, well… Orange? Yes.

    Pretty obvious what it states, Nic. *Sigh.*

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 2,664 total)