Oh tee-hee-hee. Ruddy need a sense of humour in this day and age, especially with some members on here. 😀 😉
Fawlty Towers is cool, but I much prefer Only Fools and Horses…You plonker! 😉
Because they want to be America, and don’t want to encourage the poms.
thats one view that is not supposed to represent what the whole of Australia think,
just my view.
And for what its worth I think the JSF will be fine for the RN carriers in 2020, and ok as an interim strike solution for the RAF until UCAVs come on line by 2030…..
Well, hmmm…Maybe a bit strong what you say…
The F-35 will be fine if they’re at a reasonable price of which I very much doubt they would be anyway, but time will tell. And by 2030, for the RAF at least, manned aircraft with proper pilots will still be a priority but of course, un-manned aircraft will play a vital role.
If Australia wants the F-35 then, well so be it, up to them. But if they’re not gauranteeing buying the things over worries on costs then theres at least two other options available that they would be satisfied with. If they put a bullet in the F-35’s head, then why not go for the Typhoon? It’d certainly be a better choice than the F/A-18 the way I see it.
I’d love the Rafale to fly in swiss colours, but sadly I don’t expect any fancy camo from our neighbours.
We have to sell (give, considering the current context) some to Greece for that.
Nic
The UAEAF do some rather snazzy colours. 🙂
All Flight hours are not equal.
how many Flight hours in actual war missions ?
how many Flight hours in bad conditions (sea/sand)?
how many Flight hours with really heavy external load (> 5T) ?
how many carrier take off / landing ?
Well sadly this kind of information isn’t usually available to the public.
Flight hours in various conditions such as sea/sand like you mention would probably be the easiest to figure, but even still anything accurate would be hard to come by. Both aircraft would obviously operate over the sea, the Rafale from a carrier & the Typhoon over the likes of the North Sea and of course in a “sandy” environment such as in Saudi Arabia.
Which would be a good reason to take Rafale, since it’s clearly more combat proven in all kinds of roles, has it’s AESA ready today, not only in development stage, just like the naval version is operational and proven. You are not helping the EF here. 😉
Thats what I more or less said…(But overall, 100,000+ hours flown ‘vs’ 60,000+ hours flown & they’re not just up there going round in circles, do the math) You must that bit and; ‘they’re also interested in being a part of a programme and learning from an aircraft as its being developed’. and that bit too.
Its very much about gaining experience & know how etc for the Indians. So like I say, both are fine here.
But not in a similar way, because the French companies are more involved in India in terms of licence production under ToT, JVs or even co-developments, which are important points. They have good experience in these fields which might be an advantage.
And the British alone are more involved in projects in other ways for India than France are. Same again, both are fine here. 😉
And as I say; both countries have have a healthy relationship with India…Which is always a good start.
@Jwcook, maybe Australia are thinking about putting an order in for some Typhoons since they’re not guaranteeing buying the F-35 over concerns of prices? :diablo:
Actually? Why don’t they just do that?…
The Rafale is well advanced no doubt about it, certainly more mature than the Typhoon in the A/G department at this point in time. However, ironically, overall the Typhoon is more mature as in in-service with roughly the same numbers, 100 or so for each type and 100,000+ hours flown for Typhoon and 60,000+ for Rafale as of around the time of the Paris Air Show this year.
However, the Rafale will still need various upgrades to keep it up to date (and it very much needs them if they’re serious about exports) just like any other aircraft. I’ve searched around for news on the Rafale & I haven’t came across much, it’s mostly about the ‘going ons’ in the Brazilian competition & what other news its been mentioned in is what its sharing with the Typhoon, obviously usually the likes of India, Japan, Malaysia etc but nothing in terms of upgrades & enhancments & what not. Very little about it alone.
News from various sources is always a good thing & I’m rather surprised that Dassault haven’t been as optimistic as, I’m sure, many people would have liked. At the end of the day it’s only showing a keen interest to potential customers – always a good thing.
It must be pointed out that; India are interested in learning from an aircraft that has already matured, but, it must also be pointed out they’re also interested in being a part of a programme and learning from an aircraft as its being developed. So both are fine here.
Sure, Dassault have a big presence in India with the likes of the Mirage M2K upgrades & various other projects, Ouragen, Mystere etc and also with other projects in the past. But then so do the likes of BAE Systems, or British in general with the likes of the Jags and Hawks and past links with the likes of the Hunter, Canberra, Vampire, Spitfire, Tempest etc and you just need to take a look at BAE Systems’ page to see what other projects they’re up to with India – strangly the Typhoon is a related link on that particular page. So obviously both, or all countries I should say, have a healthy relationship with India.
Eurofighter’s campaign in India might be German led but theres a lot of British influence going on there, too.
Sintra I know you aren’t a critic, but i did use the present tense rather than saying it was always a mature system. We are in the final phase of development (after all 4-7 years is no time really for a programme that goes back decades), and there is much new kit to look forward too.
I would go so far as to say that the critics are out of touch.
There is a mood of pessimism around some of the continental fans of Typhoon, but EE lightning personifies all that is good and great about the British sense of optimism in the face of adversity:D
Well, I’m not going to look at a piece of good news & think; ‘Thats pretty bad, aint it?’ =D
How about this news
Now The Eurofighter consortium has 18 of these already, and they are long lead items, and by a strange coincidence and increase of 3 units to the 18 original would be a 16% increase
Now in a totally unrelated matter:rolleyes: the number of contracted Eurofighters is 707 if you add the possible 126 unit Indian deal its 833 a 17% increase.
Coincidence????;)
cheers
Well, hmmm possibly… 😉
Its a bit like when EADS Cassidian opened (or in the process of doing so) a facility in India, Bangolore, related to the Typhoon in terms of upgrades & enhancments etc…Apparantly EADS has stressed that, I quote from a report from Combat Aircraft Monthly: ‘EADS stressed that this is being done independently of any IAF order of the Typhoon, with the aim of using partnering to take advantage of potential, talent and resources of the Indian aeospace industry’…
…I’m saying no more…
Theres a piece in the recent edition of Combat Aircraft Monthly’s News section concerning the F-35. (Theres also an article about the F-35 but haven’t got round to reading it yet.)
It states that; ‘Australia says F-35 buy could be at risk!’
‘Australian Defence Minister Stephen Smith has cited program delays and cost hikes as reasons behind his department’s decision not to guarantee Australia’s F-35 buy’.
The PAF’s idea of “owning” any Typhoon in the real world is from a wet dream, waking up excited & posting it on their “official” site. Still, I wouldn’t want to be up in a Rafale 50,000ft above Leh trying to shoot down a Chinese Su-27 at BVR. Rather a Typhoon.
I don’t believe anyone on here would say upgrades for the Typhoon have been fast. Funny enough, I have the latest edition of Combat Aircraft Montly next to me and in a rather large peice about the Typhoon, it states that: ‘Ironically, Typhoon’s Achilles heel has not been rogue Sukhoi Su-35s but the era in which it has evolved. Its main enemies have been politicians’… How very true! But it now looks as though they’re getting their fingers out & supporting it, at the least for the RAF.
Hmmm maybe I am. But, there just seems a lot of news coming out all of a sudden when theres a huge deal due to be announced any time now – coincidence maybe. When was the last time we heard any news concerning upgrades for the Typhoon was released? Four, five or even six months ago maybe? (Sooner?)…
Ah well. Its getting some quite serious upgrades anyway.
Next generation encryption technology developed by Cassidian is fitted into the Eurofighter. Encryption is a critical cyber security technique to ensure mission data is securely exchanged between friendly forces.
Eurofighter Typhoon will be the first aircraft in the world to be equipped with next generation encryption technology developed by Cassidian with support from Raytheon Systems Ltd. The full electronic key management system will be delivered shortly for integration into the platform and will be a major step forward for the management of multi-crypto platforms, potentially reducing the key loading process from one hour to less than one minute on a daily basis.
http://www.defpro.com/news/details/27690/?SID=44df5b2c294a64ed015f295d57c90c88
HUNT VALLEY, Md., Sep 12, 2011 (BUSINESS WIRE) — AAI Test & Training, an operating unit of Textron Systems, a Textron Inc. /quotes/zigman/243306/quotes/nls/txt TXT +0.85% company, announced today that it has been awarded $2.2 million by EADS-Deutschland, Cassidian for three Model 310A Advanced Boresight Equipment (ABE) systems to support Eurofighter Typhoon EF-2000 aircraft operated by the United Kingdom’s Royal Air Force. To date, AAI Test & Training has delivered EADS-Deutschland, Cassidian 18 ABE systems for the Eurofighter Typhoon EF-2000, supporting aircraft operated by the United Kingdom, Austria, Germany, Italy, Spain and Saudi Arabia.
“Our ABE system is a reliable, time-tested boresighting solution that provides warfighters the data they need to ascertain the mission readiness of their critical avionics and armament systems,” says AAI Test & Training Senior Vice President & General Manager Bob Peters. “It is easy to use and significantly reduces end-to-end harmonization time compared to legacy boresighting systems. For these reasons, the ABE system is trusted by aircraft operators and aircraft manufacturers alike.”
Just as the Indian MMRCA competition is due to be signed and a winner announced – theres been quite a bit of news coming out the wood work all of a sudden concerning various upgrades for the Typhoon.
another point of view obviously pro greek and with less credibility :
edit with correct link
Sounds awfully like the nonsense the PAF came up with a few months ago. There is a bit of a pattern emerging though; Theres a high possibilty the Indians will order the Typhoon = The Pakistanis claim they owned a bunch of RAF Typhoons (that weren’t there) with their F-16s. Maybe trying to put India off…
There could be a chance Turkey might put an order in for some Typhoons = Greece come up with a story that the Typhoon didn’t stand a chance against the F-16…
What we need now is China claiming the Typhoon didn’t stand a chance against their SU-27s in an attempt to discourage Japan.
In other news:
Engineering support services company Babcock has been awarded a further contract to provide its decoy-dispenser units for the Eurofighter Typhoon, a new-generation multi-role combat aircraft.
Under this contract, Babcock will supply parts and assemble and test more than 200 decoy dispenser units during 2012 and 2013.
Japan is apparently proceeding on schedule with the F-X fighter competition, despite the large economic impact of the recent earthquake and tsunami, and a recent government reshuffle. A Ministry of Defense spokeswoman told Bloomberg news agency that a decision is likely by year-end. Requests for proposals were issued to Boeing (for the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet), Lockheed Martin (for the F-35) and Eurofighter last April. Formal responses are due at the end of this month.
Not at all, don’t worry about it. 😉
And congratulations, best wishes to yourself, wife/girlfriend & little nipper. 🙂
About Jon Lake; well to be honest I don’t know the chap so can’t tell if he tells fibs, so what can I do. I merely read his words with great interest & I don’t think of anyone for that matter to tell “fake” criticisms to makes things more balanced for the other…The way I see it is – is he’s always been critical of the Typhoon for taking too long to intergrate various A/G weapons etc and, well, I agree with him. I certainly wouldn’t agree with him if he thought otherwise, so what can I do? In this case what he’s really saying is is that the Typhoon is the best thing at performing A/G missions.
But hey, everyone has their own opinions about certain people…
I’m not arguing & to be honest I’ve got too much of a life to do so. So, stand to your point, doesn’t make any difference because we both obviously don’t agree on many things & its just going to drag into yet another pointless ‘vs’ thread…
And why would someone believe that anyone would want to make criticisms to make a “balanced” argument is beyond me. Talk about insecure…
Well, the French aren’t going to say their Rafale got owned are they? Neither are Eurofighter about their product, Boeing & LM etc. They also “claim” a lot more too.
Question AFM & Jon Lake if you want, but you need to dig a whole lot deeper to find that they have been rather critical of the Typhoon in the past both when in development and in service. The last criticism I read was actually in AFM when the Libyan conflict kicked off and let me tell you, it got a kick in and a half! A biased Typhoon article? Like hell it was! Whether Jon Lake wrote that article I don’t remember(?) but he too has been critical of the Eurofighter programme and the Typhoon itself in the past just as he has with the Rafale, and like the Typhoon he has spoken a lot of wise & polite words of the Rafale – last I personally heard was in AFM, an article entitled Typhoon vs Rafale (meaning for India).
He spoke of both strengths and weaknesses for both aircraft but no criticisms were said. It was quite an honest article I thought.
So Jon Lake being a “Typhoon activist”? I don’t think so! Go over on PPrune, find this Jackonicko guy (if you believe its the same person), look up a few posts of him talking about the Typhoon & Rafale then come back & call him a “Typhoon activist”.
The RAF or any other Typhoon operater very rarely release any information to the general public let alone AFM, sadly.
I personally consider the Rafale to be a fine aircraft & I take some criticisms it has got from others with a giggle – meaning I call a load of sh*te! So be careful if you think I over-look it.
For an aircraft that has a wide range of multi-role capabilities it has certainly come a long way in such a short amount of time, certainly further than the Typhoon has, and the Rafale DOES have advantages over the Typhoon in this moment of time. However, there is a number of areas where I believe could be an Achilles Heel for the Rafale.
Maybe true about results, you probably wouldn’t find them in AFM. Then again you wouldn’t find an article in Air & Cosmos stating that Luftwaffe Typhoons gave the French Rafales a bit of a good going over, would you? Or anything that might be a slight criticism of the Rafale.
So, what was this topic about again?…