Good point Garry. I think glanini might be hoping that more people say Italy is top 5….. 🙂
Frankly, I wouldn’t expect anything major for a while. Perhaps a major MLU after 2010, that might involve a new engine, or perhaps just the avionics and the integration of new weapons as they appear.
As a student of naval history, Glenn, you should know that Pearl Harbor was considered “pre-emptive defense.”
They didn’t want to invade the US, just knock it out of a war that everyone knew was coming with a classic pre-emptive strike.
Anyways, Vortex was the one who brought up surprise attacks 🙂
I’ve no idea why he brought it up but when he did we need to look at history. It’s really just bantering between the two of us.
I am well aware of what Pearl Harbour was; but it was pre-emptive offense. Japan was the aggressor. But some where along the line of this discussion sneak attack has been mentioned, and then historical precedents were mentioned, and fair enough. But you have to look at the Japan of then and the Japan of now, and the world as a whole as well. Imperialism is dead. This whole thing of sneak attack is rather more general anyway, anyone who may feel severly threatened by a neighbour might simply step up and strike first. Lets get back to the topic.
history is written by the victors. would you have been taught the same lessons in class had germany and japan won?
Debatable, Japanese text books have caused controversy in the past with their less than accurate accounts of World War 2. Lets avoid the speculation, and get back to the topic.
Derby and python now form the capable looking Spyder mobile SAM system for protection of forces on the march. should be able to shred any loitering attack helos or lo-lo-lo birds limb from limb.
Precisely!
Now put that in the air, and you have no one getting away from a WVR attack.
DERBY has a diameter of 16 cm. (6.3 in.), is 362 cm. (12 ft.) long and weighs 118 kg. (260 lb.). And then it has a max engagement range of 50km!! They used the PYTHON motor and added to it to give the DERBY more range, but more than twice that of a PYTHON 4? I wonder……. :confused:
IIRC, ‘pre-emptive defence’ were the same justifications nazi germany and imperial japan used to invade other nations and started WWII.
They weren’t justifications at all, they were excuses. The Japanese had a grand plan, and the US was in the way. Germany lied to the world and said the Poles had attacked her border so they responded by invading! The rest was just not justifiable defence, it was conquest, pure and simple. I don’t see that happening again, not in the world we have today.

Even though it is BVR capable, I suspect the DERBY is designed to complement the PYTHON series for the Israelis in the short range engagement envolope. Imagine if you have a PYTHON-5 and a DERBY fired at you from 5km or less away! What escape zone you might say…..
From what I have read the DERBY is not a big missile, certainly not in AMRAAM class. Thus it’s range would be expected to somewhat less.
Rice woos China over US naval buildup
BEIJING—China is getting edgy over a new US military strategy aimed at projecting force around the globe and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice’s visit last week was an attempt to calm Beijing down, analysts said.
Funny thing is, in another decade or so it might China trying to reassure the US of the same thing.
Is it feasible to design a two stage AAM? for example lets say that the first stage could be a booster with sensors for midcourse guidance, and a Python-4 as the second stage.
Don’t see why not. The KS-172 is a two stage weapon with it’s booster attached.
Historic precedence predicts a Japanese sneak attack not a Chinese commie one.
Yes but the same mindset that drove Japanese leadership in the first half of the 20th century (and indeed the later part of the 19th) is not there now, not after 50 years of living by a dictated constitution. If the Japanese launched a sneak attack today it would pre-emptive defence, not expansionism. I am sure, and would hope Japan has learned from the utter waste World War II was for them.
Just read in Combat Fleets 2000-2001 edition, that two incomplete Improved AKULA I-class were offered to India in 1999. Could these be the ones in question today?
u think so..any certain date?
Ok, then perhaps once it has seen some service. So maybe Paris in 2007.
IAPR feature (Russian Air Power Analisys) is not re-edited book. This is not about the airplanes but about order of battle and bases. In fact, this is a small part of second volume of the book. To be immodest (sorry) – you never read such detailed Rus Orbat before.
PiBu,
I am VERY GLAD to hear that! Look forward to getting Vol.12 in the mail, which should be VERY soon for me.
does any one know when the raptor would debut at an airshow with proper performance rather then static displays and fly by’s
International? At a guess I reckon Paris 2005.