Yes, it was the ex-USS Pheonix, of the Brooklyn class.
In the 70s she went through a refit, recieving british Seacat missiles and new radars. I donΒ΄t know if the Exocet missiles were ever installed.
Regards
Exocets were never fitted.
For a complete history of the ship itself:The Strange History of the Phoenix
From The USNL: SEA POWER INTERNATIONAL March 2004.
Iraqi Coastal Defense Force Takes Shape Around Patrol Boats
By AMI INTERNATIONAL INC.
The new Iraqi coastal defense force is beginning to take shape, with impending deliveries of five patrol boats as well as continuing training initiatives.
Five Taiwanese-built patrol boats, made available by the Taiwanese maritime security police, are to be delivered to Iraq early this year. The vessels are undergoing refurbishment in Kuwait. The patrol vessels are 92 feet in length and displace 140 tons. These vessels will be equipped with navigation radar and small-caliber machine guns for self-defense. They will be capable of performing Iraqi coastal defense missions out to three nautical miles.
Training for up to 125 new naval personnel is taking place in the Port of Um Qasr under the leadership of Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. The sea services of all three nations also will be involved in the acceptance of the five patrol vessels and future training in maritime operations, leadership as well as general seamanship.
The new Iraqi coastal defense force also is planning the next step in its development β extending its coastal patrol coverage out to 12 nautical miles β which will require larger patrol vessels capable of long endurance patrols. This development will provide future business opportunities in the arena of patrol boat manufacturing, as well as medium- and small-caliber guns and navigational radars.
-ends-
Great Post Austin! Many thanks for the info. Interesting to see they have continued to go for the 9M38M (SA-N-7) on the P-15A (as with the P15 DELHI). I wonder if they ever considered the 9M317 (SA-N-12) as fitted on the TALWAR class. Was it a commonality issue?
Can the magazines that feed the 3S90 launcher for the SA-N-7 take the SA-N-12 as well, or do they require a different fit? Also, can the same MR-90 (Front Dome) FCR be used for both? If so, then the Indians have some flexibility in air defence considering the range difference between the two missiles.
Very sad! Condolences to the family. π
why doesnt australia still use them…it seems perfectly logical for them to use it
bring_it_on,
If you can convince the government to spend the money, and can help recruit an additonal two thousand or more personnel for the Navy then good luck to you. Until then, logical or not, we won’t have them again.
If it had been 20 years ago we would be reading about another shoot-down – possibly!
Australia used to have them……… π
Glenn: Mate last time I checked the IN was going for 4 nukes of the Akula class (Improved makes more sence), so where did you come up with the fact that they are only getting 2?
Ja, as far I know, and if you read the replys in this thread you will see it is two subs. With an option for a third apparently.
If the ATV is fitted with modified Agni it will be defined as an SSBN first and foremost, as this will be it’s primary capability; land attack (nuclear). A modest missile, but if the enemy is your immediate neighbour, then adequate I guess. Could this explain the AKULA plan, that is, they want a pure SSN to complement the initial ATV force?
The first types of Soviet SSBNs were only armed with 150km-range SS-1b SCUDs! And then came the 600km-range SS-N-4. So I wonder if the Indians will take this SSBN step further?
Thanks guys, if that is the case, it does make things clearer now. The impact will be interesting, but the necessity is obvious, for the IN at least. With fleet plans including regular carrier group deployments, and the sea-based leg of a nuclear triad to deploy, the sooner they induct an SSN capability, the better.
I heard that India is paying money to finish construction of two incomplete AKULA IIs.
That would make sense.
Not engagement range, no. Kinematic range, yes.
So, against a relatively slow and docile target like a bomber, the missile, if fired from above, could reach and hit it at greater ranges?
Look forward to Pacific Fighters. π
the ancient AWg-9 on Tomcat can guide 6 Phoenix missiles. each Tomcat would carry 8 Phoenix. phenomenal for a late 60s design.
Maximum Six AIM-154 only, actually.
A sad thing about Australia is that many Australian’s still believe the Asians are gonig to overrun the country (you’d be surprised how many Aussies still think that Japan is an enemy).
That perception is by no means universal or widespread. People like Pauline Hanson unfortunately blow matters out of all proportion, when they make bold and unjustified statements about the country been over run in parliament. This is just not true! And her One Nation party, which she no longer leads, suffered a major swing against it in the latest Queensland election. People have grown tired of her and the crap she stands for. I think every nation suffers from some degree of racism, as we do, but it is NOT a widespread feeling in the general Australian community in my opinion.
so do any of you know of kurt plummer – someone told me he and kopp both study/work in the same univ ? mr plummer was a air combat theorist and used to be very active in the mil newsgroups. a F22 & hypersonic UCAV devotee. some say he’s a genius, others a madman.
had a wierd style of writing that took hours to decipher.
Had a few discussions with him but found his head to be even harder than Kopps! He is very much reluctant to alter his views about UCAVs and remote controlled warfare. Plus, his ability to write a comprehendible passage for the average person to use seems impossible for him. For this reason especially, he tends to drive a lot of people away, as they can neither understand his point, or can respond in kind, or simply have NO IDEA what he is on about. It used to take me ages to both read his stuff and then reply, so I gave up. He was on our Basement forum for a bit a couple of years ago, but was banned for disrespecting members with racist comments; again he would not budge from his position or lighten his attitude. He certainly knows his stuff, but he tends to rave on without really getting to, or making a solid point. I would HATE to be in any one of his lectures! I think Kopp and Plummer might get along well, if they are at the same Uni. :rolleyes:
Guys, lets get back to the topic. π