dark light

GDL

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,255 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mig29-k #2680676
    GDL
    Participant

    Correct me if I am wrong…

    The Gorshkov battle group would most likely consist of:
    – 1 Gorshkov CV
    – 3 Delhi DDG
    – 3 Talwar FFG
    – 3 Shivalik FFG
    with the possibility of
    – 1 Akula SSN

    Each of the escort surface ships can carry at least two helos with the CV being able to carry 6-8. Gives a helo total of around 24 – 26 for just the battle group. That would leave room for about 14 – 16 Mig-29Ks on the CV.

    Added later: Of course this scenario is a wartime scenario. During peacetime, the CVBG would have less escorts, the exact number depending on availability and desire.

    Looks like the CVBG would be low on fixed wing assets and the primary function of the 29Ks would be for fleet air defense considering that the IN doesn’t have anything like the SM-2 or Aster 30. Nonetheless, the CVBG would be able to monitor and sanitize a good bit of volume in the ASW, AAW, and ASuW realms. Definitely not the best solution but a good start for the IN to start showing blue water legs.

    If in 10-15 years, the PLAN shows up in the Indian Ocean with a carrier that can hold 40+ aircraft, the IN would seriously have to reconsider going with a larger carrier.

    BTW, in the IOR, is there any other navy that would have the raw capabilities of that one IN CVBG?

    I would say even in wartime, the escorts would be fewer. You have to remember that they would want to have sufficient escort numbers to cover for both carriers that will eventually be active by approx.2012, that is the Vikramaditya (Gorshkov) and the first ADS. They have only three Talwar-class FFGs and they do intend to build 12 Shivalik-class FFGs. The Indians want to be able to field two carrier groups in future and thus I would see a typical war-footing CVBG for the IN Vikramaditya as:

    The IN Vikramaditya CV
    Two Delhi-class DDGs (possibly one would be a Bangalore-class or P15A)
    One Talwar-class FFG
    Two Shivalik-class FFG
    One large Oiler (either Aditya or Jyoti)
    One Akula-class SSN or the ATV

    IN doesn’t have anything like the SM-2 or Aster 30

    Not yet, but this has to be coming. You are not going to last relying purely on air power to protect the fleet. Enough wars have proven that I think. I think it is only a matter of time before the Indians eventually jump on the Area-wide air defence destroyer/frigate band wagon.

    If in 10-15 years, the PLAN shows up in the Indian Ocean with a carrier that can hold 40+ aircraft, the IN would seriously have to reconsider going with a larger carrier.

    I would say the Indians will be doing that long before the Chinese ever enter the IO with a flat top. As soon as the Chinese start down that road watch for the Indian reaction.

    BTW, in the IOR, is there any other navy that would have the raw capabilities of that one IN CVBG?

    Not locally, but otherwise it would only be the USN, the RN, or perhaps the Russian fleet if they go it together.

    in reply to: Mig29-k #2680762
    GDL
    Participant

    how is it such a limited run? IN is expected to order 64 Mig29Ks. thats quite a large number. 16 is the initial order.

    I believe they have an option for another larger batch. I guess a final decision on extras will be influenced by the type of fighter they go with for the ADS.

    anywhre between 2009-2012. probabaly within this decade (2009/10)

    2008/9 is the projected date, but this remains to be seen.

    I think it has been giventhe name VikramAditya (sp?) could be wrong on this one though. someone else confirm

    INS Vikramaditya by press reports.

    around the same time AG will be inducted. and yes they should be ready by then

    Maybe, but it will be a while before the wing is operational as there is the training to go through.

    2012 most likely. the work on cutting the steel for the hull has already begun

    IF IT stays on schedule.

    not to the navy K standards. the Mig29 upgrade is not confirmed. so nothing concrete on it.

    I think the Indian AF would better off waitng for the PAK-FA to materialize, or even opting for additional Su-30s.

    yes a scaled down version of the Bars is on the cards. not confirmed

    Could delay the induction of the MiG-29Ks if there are problems.

    Bars should do better performance wise.

    definitely.

    when the ADS becomes operational.

    With the Naval LCA prototype expected to fly in 2007, it could be ready for service by 2012. Again, depending on delays.

    unlikely. AG fighter wing will be a Mig29K one only.

    Initially yes, but they might deploy the naval LCA off it in future too.

    in reply to: Mig29-k #2680780
    GDL
    Participant

    This on the Zhuk vs. Bars radar issue.

    Indian Generals Attack the “Zhuk”

    The contract for the sale to India of the aircraft carrying cruiser “Admiral Gorshkov” and 16 carrier-based Mig-29K fighters which was singed in Delhi in January by Russia’s defense minister Sergey Ivanov is being threatened. On Monday the Indians arrive in Moscow to gain an understanding of it.

    According to information on hand, it originally had been planned to sign the documents for the sale of the “Admiral Gorshkov” aircraft carrier and the carrier-based fighters in November. But the Indians, referring to the fact “some technical issues” have not been studied over, requested they put off the ceremony to January. As technical issues, as it became known to Gazeta.RU, the Indians understand the MiG-29K delivery as a complete set is not with the standard “Zhuk-MEh” radars for this contract, but with the modern N-011 “Bars” – such as are being installed on the Su-30MKI being produced for the Indian air force. The “Bars” is more modern and high-speed – a phased antenna array with electronic beam scanning is used in it; the “Zhuk-MEh” is simpler, a slotted antenna array with mechanical beam scanning is used in it.

    The management of the Russian Airplane Building Corporation (RSK) MiG in every way possible has been avoiding Indian requests as regards a change of radars. The “Bars” is notably more expensive than the “Zhuk,” and the Russo-Indian contract already has been signed, that is the price for ship-borne MiG-29K is fixed delivered as a complete set with the “Zhuks.” It is clear that is simply not to RSK’s advantage to change the equipment. Besides the direct incomplete advantage, the RSK also suffers indirectly. In order to deliver the MiG-29K with another, non-standard radar, new flight tests have to take place. These not only would hit the finances again of the airplane builder, but also would place in doubt the period for fulfilling the contract: the MiG corporation simply cannot succeed in doing everything by the end of 2008 as is recorded in the Russo-Indian documents. The airplane builder’s obstinacy is even very explicable, but it already has brought about unpleasantness for itself: in particular, because of the unwillingness to install the “Bars” on the MiG-29K, Nikolay Fedorov was relieved from is post as RSK MiG general director and general designer. While trying in any event not to let the Indian contract go, Moscow took on for itself the obligations to resolve all issues which arise along the way. But MiG continues opposition. So, on 16 February, a delegation of Indian generals from the ministry of defense arrives in Moscow, but no one in essence will be talking with them: the present manager of RSK MiG, Valeriy Toryanin, has gone on an official business trip to Algiers.

    Besides, the customer’s requirement is supposed to be for seller by law, especially while it is a question of the replacement of one Russian radar for another. In the future, Moscow’s intractability can lead to India’s refusal of any Russian radars – the Indians may demand the installation on the MiG-29K, for example, of Western European radars. It is not being ruled out that the affair is exclusively the exorbitant ambitions of the “Zhuk’s” manufacturer, the Moscow OAO Fazotron-NIIR Corporation (Moscow), which always has installed its own radars on the MiG family of airplanes and which right now in a panic is afraid of losing the Indian market. (The “Bars” was created at the Tikhomirov Scientific Research Institute of Instrument Building (Zhukovskiy). – Gazeta.RU.) Although Fazotron-NIIR has positive experience in cooperation with India: the “Kop’yo” radar was created there for upgrade of the MiG-21bis fighters which serve in the Indian air force’s inventory, the MiG-21-93 variant.

    Right now the matter with Fazotron stands as not the best example. The corporation became a sub-contractor of an instrument building design bureau (Tula), which concluded a huge contract in 2000 (734 million dollars) for the development for the United Arab Emirates of the “Pantsir’-S1″ anti-aircraft missile and gun complex. Over a period of 2 years from the moment of its conclusion it was necessary to finish scientific research and experimental design work on the complex, and later over 3 years (2003-2005) to delivery 50 “Pantsirs” in three batches (12, 24 and 14 examples respectively.)

    Fazotron was obliged to develop a system for interfacing the targets and missiles (SSTsR) for the “Pantsir’”, however, they were 2 years late with it: only in the last year were autonomous tests completed of the system, which then was installed on the military vehicle, and which up to now is undergoing tests. Simply speaking, the periods for the fulfillment of an important contract with the UAE were disrupted; whether this is a trend – the fulfillment of the Indian contract by Fazotron will show.

    Source: 16.02.04, Gazeta.RU

    in reply to: Brisbane-Tokyo via Singapore – with SQ #430964
    GDL
    Participant

    Also, came back with a fiancée this time! If you want to see a photo of the two of us and her ring try here: http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showpost.php?p=395181&postcount=12

    in reply to: After the F-15Js…. #2680785
    GDL
    Participant

    One thing is for sure, if they are going to develop something again, even jointly, they are going to have to start soon, very soon. But, for now, I would think the F-35 would have to be in line for serious consideration at sometime in the next 5-10 years.

    And thanks guys……. 🙂

    in reply to: Brisbane-Tokyo via Singapore – with SQ #430965
    GDL
    Participant

    Some photos…. 🙂 Various shots from Tokyo.

    I have down-sized these from my digital camera so the res might not be crisp.

    Enjoy!

    in reply to: After the F-15Js…. #2681155
    GDL
    Participant

    Only related to my personal news……… but thought I would post these here.

    Enjoy. 🙂

    in reply to: Mig29-k #2681207
    GDL
    Participant

    Would anyone know the max payload that the MiG-29K will be able to carry if it plans to take off from the sky jump?

    Someone with some more info on the Mig-29K might be able to answer that.

    Also does anyone want to make an educated guess as to how many MiGs the Gorshkov could put in the air in say 5 mins?

    The redeisgn depicts two Mig-29Ks can be sitting set and ready to launch within a minute of each other. Once gone I guess they could have another in position to go not long after them, so say three lauches in 5 mins. At least two.

    in reply to: Mig29-k #2681572
    GDL
    Participant

    Artist rendition of the ADS :

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Images/ADS2.jpg

    The image is a drawing done by a friend of mine whom I have co-written with before. His name is Mrityunjoy Mazumdar, an Indian living in California. I think his sketch is more or less that of the STOBAR model found here:http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/ADS.html

    24 Mig-29K’s plus 6-8 Helo? Isn’t that a small Airwing for a Carrier of her size? (i.e. 45,000 tons)

    Scooter: have a look here http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Gorshkov.html

    Where are they going to fit more aircraft beyond 24 Mig-29Ks and a few Helos? Depsite its weight the hangar and deck space is still limited even after the proposed refit (this is not a another Kuznetsov after all), and I think anymore aircraft and you’ll have a traffic problem.

    in reply to: F/A-22 Cockpit Displays (from Lockheed video) #2681578
    GDL
    Participant

    Perhaps by comparing the detected radar signature to similar or identical signatures stored in an on-board electronic library?

    Precisely. The MFDs present a ‘grand’ picture of the battlespace taken from the Raptor’s own integrated sensors, and off-board sensors in other Raptors, and AWAC aircraft etc via datalinks. The displays and all the symbology is indentical to that found in the F-22 ADF simulation game. If the real Raptor is technically as easy to fight in as it is in the game, then it will be a dream machine to fly and fight in!

    in reply to: What happened to DID? #254416
    GDL
    Participant

    I don’t play my stuff as much as I used to, pretty busy with other things. My computer is still old and so my sims are all older WIN95/98 types. Examples are Janes’ Longbow 2, MS CFS, and of course DID’s F-22 ADF, and TAW. The only ones I have loaded up recently have been F-22 ADF and WWII Fighters from Janes. My two favourites.

    in reply to: F/A-22 Cockpit Displays (from Lockheed video) #2681777
    GDL
    Participant

    Nice shots.

    The D.I.D F-22 ADF combat flight sim game has the cockpit displays done almost exactly the way they are in reality. And that game came out 7 years ago.

    in reply to: IAF, Russia testing Brahmos.. #2682131
    GDL
    Participant

    True, the MTCR is by no means enforcable international law, or even a ratified treaty, but a series of established and agreed guidelines and rules governing the transfer of long range missiles and similar weapons, and related tech. Designed to protect those that have joined it, principally the major powers I think. But within the regime, members are allowed on rare occasions to export long range missiles to each other provided assurances are given on their use.

    One should read more on the MTCR, as it will explain more on exactly what it is all about.

    in reply to: Looking for RMAF MiG 29N pictures #2682145
    GDL
    Participant

    RD 33 engines is smokes heavily when it in military power…RMAF has a proposal to replaced it with smoke free RD 43..

    It was that very smoke that helped RAAF pliots in their F/A-18s determine what the RMAF pilots were up to, at least in terms of speed, during exercises in 1998.

    in reply to: IAF, Russia testing Brahmos.. #2682184
    GDL
    Participant

    I was under the impression it was based on the standard Yakhont.

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,255 total)