Thank you very much indeed Steve – this information is very useful.
I do though have a small issue which I cant seem to resolve – the tie strut between the 2 top longerons at the point of deviation (on the right) actually has a 9 degree chamfer on each end which suggests it is actually offset from the crank and not centred as shown.
Not sure where you mean Hugh?? which tie strut?? Are you talking about where the Front and rear fuselage join? if so there is no tie beteween the upper longerons. Infact there is no tie strut that goes between the top longerons? The front half has a front frame and then a frame at the point it joins with the rear, the rear assembly is a complete welded frame.:confused:
The rear section is a complete factory welded asembly, not to sure what point you are trying to make here? The drawings dont match the finished component, nothing new there!!
I can take a picture of that area tomorow on a frame thats in the workshop and post it for you.
Is this a Round or Square tube?, if you look at the drawings posted by Low and Slow you will see the tubes that are there. There is square tune at the fwd station at the bottom of the firewall, two round tubes with riveted fittings on the ends at the lower wing pick up fittings. These are bolted inplace and the fwd of these two also has two tie rods to the front and rear of it. After that there is the rear frame at the front to rear join. Hope that helps.
Hi Hugh
Pic attached, you will see that the cross member is as shown on the drawing.
The 9 degrees tapper you mentioned will be the tapper from the front to rear of that section before the sharp change at the rear.
Very Nice:)
He hasnt got one for a Gamecock as well by any chance has he;)
And not a High Viz in sight 😮
Ken
Need to look in the shed, will Let you know. 😉
Matthew
Hampden, to deep in the fuselage for an Oxford. Difficult to tell much detail from the pic really.
Hi Ken
Photo’s attached, it looks DH and i had thought it might be Rapide? ii Think its been adapted to fit a leaf spring at some point in its life!!
Hugh they have been flying around for a few years now so i figure that whats right 😉
The answer probaby lies in the fact that the Tiger was not so much designed as created!!! It has also gone through alot of modifications durring war time. Im not supprised some of the drawings dont match:D
I think you are right.
What I have done is found a compromise – I have aligned the rear bulkhead and the support bracket for the tailplane with the centre lines as shown – with a few minor adjustments to the dimensions and I believe we have an acceptable solution..
One question – is there a packing plate below the support bracket for the tailplane?
No, sometimes packed with washers to adjust tailplane incidence.
Hi Ken
Hope these help.
Hugh, if you mean the tailplane support strut its not an oval tube. Its a round tube with a wooden fairing screwed to the rear of it. Well it is on a 82a 🙂
Do you have a copy of the Drawings forthe 82c that are available on disc?? useually avilable on ebay at a very reasonable price.
The 82c is a very different beast, i have to say having flown both the c is a delight compared to the a 🙂