Ain’t from a Whirly then…;)
Elliott, you have a PM…
I don’t know anything about the item, but if that is a computor generated picture I’m astounded!
So am I every time Matt sends me a finished instrument, but remember these are all to scale and still have to be ‘textured’ to look exactly like the originals, when everything is finished the cockpit will be better than new… 😉
I don’t know anything about the item, but if that is a computor generated picture I’m astounded!
So am I every time Matt sends me a finished instrument, but remember these are all to scale and still have to be ‘textured’ to look exactly like the originals, when everything is finished the cockpit will be better than new… 😉
Hmmm, so have I and can find nothing like it in any of the Hurricane photo’s I’ve seen on the net?
Tony are we talking ‘something like’ or ‘same as’
Stu…
Hmmm, so have I and can find nothing like it in any of the Hurricane photo’s I’ve seen on the net?
Tony are we talking ‘something like’ or ‘same as’
Stu…
Nope the above is rubbish, due to me forgetting how to read!! 😮
After looking at the info we have again, we have written confirmation of 2 places & events where Whirlwind P6994 was at the same time. Eglin Field for a Fighter Conference and Anacostia for her Navy Evaluation… 😉
I’m afraid both Wright Field and Patuxent River are mere assumptions on our part at the moment, which until we get info to prove otherwise are back on the shelf again… 🙁
Niall…
I’ve since found through a communication from Air Commodore Jones to Divisional Headquarters Wright Field, P6994 was delivered via Anacostia to Wright Field, Materiel Division, Experimental Engineering Section in July 1942… 😉
The next bit is if the USAAF made an evaluation report, what might they call it, was there a standard form for aircraft evaluation?
As you can probably guess I’m running blind here, so bear with me… 😮
Stu…
The Whirlwind was at the earlier Florida conference, not the Pax River one that the book covers. I haven’t seen reference to similar documents for the earlier conference, but it must be out there!
It was a Seafire, by the way, not Spit.
bob
Yes, your right, a Seafire! I remember I was gutted when the Whirly wasn’t in there… Ha!
Didn’t it also mention Peter Twiss, as I have an account of him flying the Whirly down to a florida conference, but it didn’t say which base, hence this post, the compass went US so he stopped over at Cherry Point to get it sorted… (Not the book on the NAS Patuxent River though. )
All good fun… :rolleyes:
Stu…
…and 16-23 October 1944 NAS Patuxent River, MD
Now I remember bought a book about that and although very interesting reading it did not mention anything about the Whirly but did have the evaluation reports at the rear, for Mosquito and Spitfire, unfortunately I appear to have mislaid it long since… :confused:
Stu…
Thanks JB…
Just sounding out here…
Concerning the British aircraft at these conferences, would there be reports including photo’s of cockpits, engines, armaments etc. after their evaluation and if so, any idea as to what US Dept. would that fall under at Eglin Proving Ground Command…
I know the German reports of allied aircraft were pretty detailed, and I surmise the American equivalent would be the same…
Anything to save time searching through NARA archives… 😉
Jur…
Sorry I haven’t replied sooner, thank you for posting this for me, one thing though…
“tilt and shift functions“
How does that work?
Will a virtual camera with the same format/focal length be able to make the same perspective corrections with tilt and shift functions produce an image of a 3D virtual cockpit that fits the original photo?
Because that is what we will need to do…
Ross…
Your detailed information on the AIB accident reports is far more than I had hoped for, it will be put to very good use…
Thank you so very much.
Stuart…
Ian…
One of the Norfolk loss reports does include several copies of the same large format cockpit photo, the cockpit having separated from the wings and rear fuselage.
😮
Cockpit photo?
Ian, you have a PM…