dark light

plawolf

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 4,042 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2692356
    plawolf
    Participant

    I think J-10 with Mirage 2k-5/9 class avionics would be superior to mirage 2k 5/9 and cheaper by almost 1/3 or 1/2! ..so the question is why not!

    I mean just look at it from a logical point of view..if J-10 is fitted with Advanced western Avionics…than its one of the most superior planes out there…PAF should follow indian example..see what they made of Su-30..and it only costs ~40 million, superior and cheaper than most of the western planes…PAF should do the similar…if there is J-10 with Thrust Vectoring out there…then Im sure J-10 + western avionics can take on Su-30mki.

    well i think you answered your own question there. the J10 with advanced western radar and avionics would be cheaper and more capable then most of the western 3rd gens on the market and not far off from the euro-canards, so why would any western supplier give the J10 their avionics and radar so that the J10 can take orders from their fighters?

    what does the French make more from, selling radars and avionics for J10s which in turn would be sold to a thrid party, or selling M2K-5/9s directly to that thrid party?

    the only thing that may persuade the French to sell radars and avionics to the J10 is if the PLAAF have all their J10s fitted with the same radar. only then will it be worth while for the French.

    however, the PLAAF wont take foreign kit unless it comes with full ToT and licence production in country later. and again we hit a snag as the French would not be willing to do that, cos then they would loose all their technical edge in a few years, and their next gen fighters wont be able to compete with their chinese counterparts, as the chinese made fighters will almost certainly be cheaper, and will most likely be on par in terms of performance.

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2692364
    plawolf
    Participant

    …. There is a rumour that PAF will get J10 in a few months for testing inside Pakistan… I have no idea whether it is correct but the options are limited and the time is running out.

    highly unlikely. from what i read in the AFM interview, PAF pilots have not even flown in the j10 yet, so having one sent to pakistan for ‘testing’ is highly unlikely to happen anytime soon.

    in the AFM interview, the PAF commander said they would like to have pilots fly the thing to know what its true capacities are. what they know already is most likely only from watching flying displays etc.

    i think that one of the main reasons that PAF pilots havent yet flown in the j10 is because there are only singleseaters, and the PLAAF cant take the change of letting an unexperienced pilot take one of their newset fighters in the air for extensive manovers by himself (if you are just going to fly the thing straigt and level, what can you learn about it?), nor do they have the time to train a PAF pilot from scratch when the PLAAF’s training needs arent satisfied yet.

    however, with the j10Bs coming on line, the PAF should be given a full demonstration soon.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2692393
    plawolf
    Participant

    Radar and avionics are the key if they are mastered the rest is matter of

    time.

    This is the statement. Notice the word ALL.

    “The Chinese are developing precision guided munitions and all sorts of weopons-good radars-so all those things we didnot have in the past we can
    get from China”

    not really, that statement just said that china can now provide all the different types of equipment the west has to offer, it doesnt say anything about these equipment being of the same, or even similar ability.

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2692678
    plawolf
    Participant

    but when?

    in reply to: FAR too many 'snapper' threads #1980568
    plawolf
    Participant

    And more irritating than pop-ups. Maybe we should add a max posts of 10 a day?

    what if they start saving up their ‘post rations’? 😮

    in reply to: funny picture-2 #1980596
    plawolf
    Participant

    more…

    in reply to: FAR too many 'snapper' threads #1980634
    plawolf
    Participant

    hmm….its like one of those soaps you try to aviod watching…

    in reply to: F/A-22 with external AIM-120 #2692682
    plawolf
    Participant

    well i think its a little too much to hope for that your enemy will send in lumbering bombers and bomb laiden fighterbombers to attack an F22 base without some form of CAP in support. in pure fighter V fighter engagments, the F22 will need all the RCS reduction it can get to ensure that it can get the first shot off, especially against the newer fighters becoming operational lately.

    remeber that extra missiles count for nothing if you get shot down before you have a chance to use them.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2692684
    plawolf
    Participant

    You missed the important point.

    China reaching Western Standards in terms of PGMs and other stuff is matter of

    short time.

    not really, the article said that pakistan has been impressed and pleased with china’s progress (in terms of radar and avionics) but they still think china has a long way to go to fully catch up with the west. common sense really.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2692686
    plawolf
    Participant

    yeah, seen the article, but nothing really groundbreaking, so didnt bother posting about it.

    just a few more main points.

    – the flying prototypes will not be the production verson. a model showed that the cockit is to be redesigned to give better visability.

    – the FC-1 is to get IFR and IRST as well in the future.

    – will get western avionics and radar, grifo is a leading candiate because of PAF’s past experience with their products, but may face issues intergrating the SD10 onto it.

    – interestingly, the ‘armarment’ section stated MICA was a BVRAAM. not sure if that is a mistake or there is something soing on that we dont know about.

    – pakistan will wnat to be able to product indigious versons of the plane eventually, and any additional orders on top of the 150 placed will be made in country.

    in reply to: FAR too many 'snapper' threads #1980666
    plawolf
    Participant

    still, i am no wiser as to why there are so many snapper related threads. 🙁

    in reply to: FAR too many 'snapper' threads #1980673
    plawolf
    Participant

    Ah, plawolf! We were starting to worry about you…… 😀

    ahhh…didnt know you cared. :p

    in reply to: F/A-22 with external AIM-120 #2692726
    plawolf
    Participant

    About the shot-down of a F-117 over Serbia, it is little known, that a French officer,
    still gratefull about the role of Serbia in WWII, gave away all the data for a Serbian F-117 trap.

    not blaming everything on the french again are we? 😀 IIRC, the F117 shootdown was a result of the serbians using older radars that had longer wavelengths, therefore deminishing some of the F117’s stealth charateristics, which were designed primarily against moderned, high res radars with shorter wavelengths.

    back on topic, i agree that external weapons rail,s especially AAM rails will be of minimal use to the F22. why would it need extra AAMs if there is no longer a serious enemy air threat?

    however, external droptanks would be more useful.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2692735
    plawolf
    Participant

    maybe someone would like to start a new ‘Mugabe haters thread’ or sth. lets leave this one to the airplanes shall we?

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2692756
    plawolf
    Participant

    GD also posted sth like this on the ‘speculations thread’, IIRC. all i can do when i see one of these is put my hands up and ask, ‘ why do they bother’? just spoils a perfectly good pic. 🙁

Viewing 15 posts - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 4,042 total)