dark light

plawolf

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,361 through 3,375 (of 4,042 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #394402
    plawolf
    Participant

    “I got some CS questions since were on the subject. How do guys change weapons so fast when there using the sniper rifle? They keep telling me they use the q key, but that only toggles between two weapons.”

    well u can customise ur ‘previous weapon’ and ‘next weapon’ keys. personally i use the middle button on my mouse for both, and with a little practice, u can quickly change between all ur weapons while still having ur left hand (if ur right handed that is) on the keyboard to move around freely.

    in reply to: anyone play CS? #1974961
    plawolf
    Participant

    “I got some CS questions since were on the subject. How do guys change weapons so fast when there using the sniper rifle? They keep telling me they use the q key, but that only toggles between two weapons.”

    well u can customise ur ‘previous weapon’ and ‘next weapon’ keys. personally i use the middle button on my mouse for both, and with a little practice, u can quickly change between all ur weapons while still having ur left hand (if ur right handed that is) on the keyboard to move around freely.

    plawolf
    Participant

    dont the PLA already have the FT2000 in the later stages of development if not already deployed? slightly modifying it to be air launched would not be that big a challenge, so wouldnt that make more sence then to pay for someone else to develop a similar missile?

    in reply to: SHARs #2687244
    plawolf
    Participant

    by the looks of things, the Jags wont be the only ones to be axed. :rolleyes: 🙁

    in reply to: Nicest Looking Aircraft #2687246
    plawolf
    Participant

    but as srbin sort of proves, beauty is in the eys of the beholder. since flankers dont tickle ur fance, how abt these babies?;)

    in reply to: Nicest Looking Aircraft #2687249
    plawolf
    Participant

    now there’s a beauty.:cool:

    in reply to: SHARs #2687269
    plawolf
    Participant

    but the thing is, the SHARs are being retired NOW, whereas these new carriers and their JSF’s wont arive for around another 5 years at the quickest.

    guess the RN will have to call time out if anyone with a half decent AF chooses to have a go at it in the meantime.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: SHARs #2687288
    plawolf
    Participant

    i think its mostly to do with budgeting then anything else. the RN also got rid of a couple of its airdefence destroyers, and im sure the navy top brass did like that much, but they have no other choice.

    its just some short sighted poilitions who argue that since the cold war is over, the RN doesnt need to be that big and powerful as it costs too much. its ppl like them that forced the RN to scrap half its fleet right before the flaklands war, and they were the first to criticise when ships were lost cos there wasnt sufficient air cover as half the carreirs were turned into tin cans. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Can middle weight fighters compete well in today's market? #2687360
    plawolf
    Participant

    with multi-role and BVR becoming the new buzz words, larger fighters seem to be more attractive to rich buyers as they clearly have a natural advantage over middle-weights in such fields.

    for those on limited budgets, light-weights seem to be more perferible to middle-weights as they can be alot cheaper. however, for those opting more the later block F16s over the likes of the typhoon and rafale, the decision was probably syaued by a mixture of political pressure and the fact that the F16 is a much more mature platform that has proven its worth, whereas the new middle-weight 4th gens are seen as more of a gamble.

    the above two catagories pretty much covers most of the world’s AF’s in terms of buying power, so there is just little room left in the market.

    personally, i blame the price tag. the middle-weights are priced way above the vast majority of light-weights, and even higher then some of the better heavy-weights, so effectively they priced themselves out of the market as well.

    in reply to: General Discussion #395325
    plawolf
    Participant

    “No – I was just amazed that the spelling was fairly good and it made sense! Not sure about ‘Dumbafied’ though.”

    interesting interpretation.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: A-levels and GCSEs #1975466
    plawolf
    Participant

    “No – I was just amazed that the spelling was fairly good and it made sense! Not sure about ‘Dumbafied’ though.”

    interesting interpretation.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: General Discussion #395330
    plawolf
    Participant

    of course the AK47 is a ruggide and reliable weapons as it has proven time and again, and no one is disputing that fact.

    however, just because the AK is ruggid it dont mean that the weapon is indestructible. it still needs cleaning and replairing if it is to stay in peak condition over a long period of time. and i think that is sth that has espcaped most non-professional users of the type.

    one of the AK’s strong points is that like most russian weapons, it can still work even when damaged. but it can also be one of it weakness, as the user may not be aware that the weapon has been damaged and continue to use it cause further degration of the weapon.

    ur average day iraqi or afgan AK owner would be quite content to have a weapon that can shoot, but i’d imagain that the standards of the RM and RA would be higher. as u pointed out, the SA80 was designed to be a precision weapon, so its users are trained and used to such weapons, but i strongly doubt that ur average AK thats been knocking around for almost a decade would be very good in the accuracy department.

    the AK might be fun to spray bullets with, but i think most soilders would be more confortable going to war using a weapon that they at least know well, and are used to.

    in reply to: "Iraq Red Caps 'deprived of ammo'" #1975468
    plawolf
    Participant

    of course the AK47 is a ruggide and reliable weapons as it has proven time and again, and no one is disputing that fact.

    however, just because the AK is ruggid it dont mean that the weapon is indestructible. it still needs cleaning and replairing if it is to stay in peak condition over a long period of time. and i think that is sth that has espcaped most non-professional users of the type.

    one of the AK’s strong points is that like most russian weapons, it can still work even when damaged. but it can also be one of it weakness, as the user may not be aware that the weapon has been damaged and continue to use it cause further degration of the weapon.

    ur average day iraqi or afgan AK owner would be quite content to have a weapon that can shoot, but i’d imagain that the standards of the RM and RA would be higher. as u pointed out, the SA80 was designed to be a precision weapon, so its users are trained and used to such weapons, but i strongly doubt that ur average AK thats been knocking around for almost a decade would be very good in the accuracy department.

    the AK might be fun to spray bullets with, but i think most soilders would be more confortable going to war using a weapon that they at least know well, and are used to.

    in reply to: General Discussion #395362
    plawolf
    Participant

    “Whats wrong with it? Look at the question!
    “Why cannot the government not just leave things”
    What does it mean? Double negative?”

    well duh.:rolleyes:

    the ‘it’ i was refering to was the new gov plan, not the GCSE as it stands. i suposed u also thought the rest of my post was an argument in support of the old system cos i like wasting my time.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: A-levels and GCSEs #1975505
    plawolf
    Participant

    “Whats wrong with it? Look at the question!
    “Why cannot the government not just leave things”
    What does it mean? Double negative?”

    well duh.:rolleyes:

    the ‘it’ i was refering to was the new gov plan, not the GCSE as it stands. i suposed u also thought the rest of my post was an argument in support of the old system cos i like wasting my time.:rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 3,361 through 3,375 (of 4,042 total)