dark light

plawolf

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,436 through 3,450 (of 4,042 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #397956
    plawolf
    Participant

    ur sence of ‘humour’;) 😀

    in reply to: A new low in beginning a new thread #1976745
    plawolf
    Participant

    ur sence of ‘humour’;) 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #397960
    plawolf
    Participant

    “Money. That is what it is all about. One bullet costs x, therefore one million bullets cost x x 1,000,000. Cheaper by half to buy only 500,000, wouldn’t you say? “

    even cheaper still not to invade at all.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: "Iraq Red Caps 'deprived of ammo'" #1976750
    plawolf
    Participant

    “Money. That is what it is all about. One bullet costs x, therefore one million bullets cost x x 1,000,000. Cheaper by half to buy only 500,000, wouldn’t you say? “

    even cheaper still not to invade at all.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Velly Interesting news re: J-11s in PLAAF service #2691401
    plawolf
    Participant

    “Show me a single Air to Ground or Air to Air missile that MKI has fired and MKK has not.”

    when did i say that?:confused:

    “MKI radar can look further and can engage more targets simultaneosly but it is limited to capabilities of R-77 range. Where only two can be updated with data links simulaneously and that is what the current capabilities of MKK radar is. “

    there are greater advantages to longer radar range, for example, if u see the other guy first, u can position urself better for a kill (to the side or even behind the other guy where his radar doesnt have good coverage.).

    however, i would doubt that such advantages would be that profound in a real war situation when both sides have AWACS and dozens of a/c airborn at the same time. still an advanatge is an advantage, whether its worth the extra cost and time delay is another matter.

    in reply to: Velly Interesting news re: J-11s in PLAAF service #2691723
    plawolf
    Participant

    “I believe the indigenization would allow for modifications but these modifications should be known to Sukhoi. I don’t think two seaters are covered at all.”

    just known or agreed to?

    also, why do u think that the twin seaters wont be considered? is it because of the JH7A?

    personaly, i think the JH7As will form a very important part of the PLAAF/PLANAF strick force, however i feel that some roles the JH7 just cant perform as well as (maybe not at all) as the MKK. (thinking more of ground attack as opposed to antishipping). so it would be a good idea to have a few more MKKs (especially at much lower costs if produced domestically), also as the PLA flanker fleet increases in size, more twin trainers may be needed. these two needs added together should mroe then justify the PLA wanting a twin seater J11 line.

    in reply to: General Discussion #398219
    plawolf
    Participant

    oh, those are too obvious, i was thinking of sth else.;)

    in reply to: A new low in beginning a new thread #1976856
    plawolf
    Participant

    oh, those are too obvious, i was thinking of sth else.;)

    in reply to: Velly Interesting news re: J-11s in PLAAF service #2691728
    plawolf
    Participant

    “like the Flanker MKK design is any newer “

    MKI is newer and probably better, but there are alot more MKK and SKs.;)

    in reply to: General Discussion #398237
    plawolf
    Participant

    no wonder u two get along so well.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: A new low in beginning a new thread #1976880
    plawolf
    Participant

    no wonder u two get along so well.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: General Discussion #398263
    plawolf
    Participant

    must…resist…temptation…

    damn u hamburger!:mad:

    in reply to: A new low in beginning a new thread #1976900
    plawolf
    Participant

    must…resist…temptation…

    damn u hamburger!:mad:

    in reply to: General Discussion #398268
    plawolf
    Participant

    “Been done already.
    In Biafra the rebel forces would go forward in groups of about twenty – with one gun. The idea was that if they man with the gun got shot then someone else would pick it up and carry on. If they shot one of the enemy and capture his gun then the force would split and carry on…
    Supply problems were their biggest problem – sometimes they had plenty of ammo but only a few guns, other times it was the other way round. When they had plenty of both it was almost certain that it was the wrong ammo for the guns they had. Any wonder that arms dealers love civil wars when the side with the money is lead by the clueless?”

    u’d expect the armed forces of the worlds fourth biggest economy and former world superpower to do a little better wouldnt u?:rolleyes:

    in reply to: "Iraq Red Caps 'deprived of ammo'" #1976904
    plawolf
    Participant

    “Been done already.
    In Biafra the rebel forces would go forward in groups of about twenty – with one gun. The idea was that if they man with the gun got shot then someone else would pick it up and carry on. If they shot one of the enemy and capture his gun then the force would split and carry on…
    Supply problems were their biggest problem – sometimes they had plenty of ammo but only a few guns, other times it was the other way round. When they had plenty of both it was almost certain that it was the wrong ammo for the guns they had. Any wonder that arms dealers love civil wars when the side with the money is lead by the clueless?”

    u’d expect the armed forces of the worlds fourth biggest economy and former world superpower to do a little better wouldnt u?:rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 3,436 through 3,450 (of 4,042 total)