dark light

Aerial

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 70 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Calling all 1980s Vulcan crewmembers…. #1163977
    Aerial
    Participant

    Hi Flightpath, I’m not ex-vulcan aircrew but I do remember seeing some mention of the yellow faced Seiko wristwatch over on PPRuNe. This thread is it: http://www.pprune.org/military-aircrew/370093-seiko-gen-2-a-2.html#post4872545. It isn’t going to move your query forward but it might be worth you posting your question there. Another suggestion is the ‘Did you fly the Vulcan?’ thread. Good luck.
    Regards, Aerial

    in reply to: Donald Campbell's Bluebird K7 #1171047
    Aerial
    Participant

    Keith, there’s a lot in what you say and they used to be very common. For me however, the photograph is not distinct enough to see if there is such a legend. I suspect that the plate is not big enough above and below the toggle, so I stick to my supposition for the time being!

    Regards, Aerial

    in reply to: Donald Campbell's Bluebird K7 #1171246
    Aerial
    Participant

    Hmmm. I wonder why someone would go to the bother of drawing a square on an instrument panel with a scriber. Perhaps, maybe, it is a temporary bodge? Could it be that the switch was occupying a previously drilled hole and it’s threaded portion is a smaller diameter such that the securing nut would pull itself back through the hole on tightening?

    Any good bodger would drill the right sized hole in a bit of sheet metal and cut a square around it. Perhaps then what you see in the photo are the bright edges of what is effectively a square washer?

    Regards, Aerial

    in reply to: Spotted #1187976
    Aerial
    Participant

    Heard a Merlin engine just a few moments ago then turned round to see a fleeting glimpse of an elliptical winged Spitfire carrying D-Day stripe markings on the underside. RAF Cosford is the location.

    in reply to: Merlin engine #1196488
    Aerial
    Participant

    Nick, Merlin Pete would be your man for this. Perhaps he’ll be along shortly.
    Regards, Aerial

    in reply to: 'The Dam Busters' free with the Daily Mail #1188056
    Aerial
    Participant

    MANY THANKS

    Thank you very much Roger, I’m most grateful to you. 🙂

    Aerial

    in reply to: 'The Dam Busters' free with the Daily Mail #1188398
    Aerial
    Participant

    RELATED TOPIC

    Due to a “senior moment” by Aerial, I have become separated from the address to which the coupons need to be sent to and I can’t find it on the Web, including the Mail’s site. Let me tell you that I feel such a twit.

    Can anyone help me out please, before their newspapers go for re-cycling? Thank you in advance, if you can.

    in reply to: Shackleton serial? #1197228
    Aerial
    Participant

    I think (and am open to correction) that Green Satin was the “high speed” version of Blue Silk and it was the Blue Silk equipment that was installed in Shackletons, certainly Mk2 phase 3s and Mk3 phase 3s. I’m pretty sure that Green Satin was used in Canberras among other fleets.

    A couple of links: http://www.john-dillon.co.uk/V-Force/green_satin.html
    This next one seems to contradict what I had left open for correction! http://www.skomer.u-net.com/projects/radar.htm
    Here, also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNaoZlqg04A Look at the more info at the top right hand corner.

    Despite the contradictions to my recollections, I still think that my facts are correct. In the last link, the author says about his Green Satin equipment “This version could track speeds up to 750 knots …” and you wouldn’t need that capability on the Shack.

    For my contribution on possible airframe serial, try XR?75.

    Aerial

    in reply to: Spitfire – 'Data plate specials' #1173107
    Aerial
    Participant

    Hmm. The paperwork!

    To quote WJ244: ……”sold with a file containing photos and written details of what was repaired and replaced during restoration. If the file is maintained future purchasers know exactly what they are getting for their money.”

    My point in post #45 is that such a file surely is an airworthiness requirement and as such, ought to contain precise details of the restoration (or long overdue repairs)!

    Aerial

    in reply to: Spitfire – 'Data plate specials' #1184112
    Aerial
    Participant

    Well, it is a very complicated subject, there is no doubt. My view is that what was once considered to be a total write off during the war for reasons of cost, manhours and materiel has had a re-appraisal, because those resources have become available.

    The time interval between write off action and the decision to use those resources is a bit long however…..!

    Aerial

    in reply to: Anyone Going To Watch The Fun At Cosford Today? #1190387
    Aerial
    Participant

    Yes! You would be best advised to be there from 1200 (from a trustworthy source).

    There have been many large aircraft into Cosford but this would certainly be the biggest to leave under its own steam!

    Aerial

    in reply to: Airframe and Radio Equipment Identification #1200000
    Aerial
    Participant

    AM – thanks for info, appreciated.

    I have absolutely no idea on either the equipment or the airframe, hence the questions! I’ll have a scout round and see if I can use that info and expand it.

    Anyone else got suggestions or knowledge? Anyone need it for their project?

    Aerial

    in reply to: Video Of North American T-28 #1201320
    Aerial
    Participant

    Feedback on your video

    Hi there!

    I have just watched that video you posted the link to and I must say that you have a lot of things right! As it says, No distracting narration. No cheesy music.

    So many others that I have watched are spoiled by those things, so much so, that I immediately stop it and find something else to do. I’ll mute the sound if the video is originally a “silent movie” to watch, but that’s it.

    Another pet dislike is the low rumble on the soundtrack, caused by wind noise and distorted sound.

    I detect a little wind noise but it is minimal, taking into account the wind speed that day as shown by the windsock. I must congratulate you on a really good piece of work and thank you for posting it. I will watch your others in due course.

    Aerial

    in reply to: WANTED – Ideas for a documentary film… #1231434
    Aerial
    Participant

    Phillip,
    My tuppence worth: J Boyle has some inspiring ideas that would spur me on if I had a camcorder. The plastic kit construction type of subject has been mentioned more than once but how about NevH’s mixed with plastic kits? There’s a drinking (tea, beer – I can’t remember) establishment in York that I once read about here or over on PPrune where the WWII aircrew signed the walls. Maybe they did more than that and I believe the proprieter can give a guided tour. This could open up the subject of aircraft from WWII and then onward to the kits.

    I wish you well with the project, whatever the eventual subject and direction.

    Aerial

    in reply to: Spitfire Canopy Rails for Static #1181362
    Aerial
    Participant

    Stuart,
    you say “The canopy changes shape as it slides, pulling in tighter rearward,and expanding forward”.
    Could I ask: is that why fitters had such a time getting canopies to slide well, to the approval of the pilots – in case they had to get out easily?
    Aerial

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 70 total)