Trident replacement is also going to get PWR3 which is based on a US design.
There is also talk about them doing more none deterrent patrol work as well for example cruise missile launch platform.
The main problem I see is another gap developing between construction of the last Astute and the first Trident successor…we all know how that kind of thing affected the Astute program!
Pretty cool! It will have the latest communications and navigation kits too.
Norway to launch new ship in June
Looks like things going to turn into a small conflict, what options does PAN have since they are obviously overwhelmed in naval power?
The simple answer is even without the last ten years of rapid modernisation within the China navy the PN would be no match for them.
The PN has taken delivery of an ex US Hamilton class Coastguard cutter with some of its weapon systems stripped out. Even the older 053 upgrade frigates would have little trouble with the PN fleet.
In an ideal world the PN would procure some new Light Corvette armed with some decent ASM, that is unlikely to happen anytime soon. There has been some talk of procuring some Maestrale and Soldati class frigates/corvettes off the Italians. That would certainly be a capability improvement but not enough to go toe to toe with China. If they want some offensive punch the best solution would be some diesel SSK, again some talk of that but nothing concrete. Armed with Mk48 ADCAP and Sub Harpoon and you have something that would give Chinese naval planners pause. Maybe they could try an tie an SSK procurement into any US FMS sale to Taiwan. A common class paid significantly for by US money, in return for greater access to Subic bay.
Well well well, after all the prevarication over an F16 upgrade this is an interesting development! Expect China to throw its toys out of the pram over this…
First question is what specification? Block 50/52+? Would seem logical except that Taiwan wants to upgrade its current F16 with an AESA, so maybe a hybrid specification more similar to the Block 60 of the UAE…that would be most useful for Taiwan as Block 60 is effectively an F35 in F16 skin!
Now all they need to do is sort out the question of some new Diesel SSK!
Once all remaining Type-23 get ARTISAN and CAMM they will have much the same capability as Type-26 so they might as well get it considering they are remaining in service for quite a while. Type-23 was the first RN type marked for CEC.
I think the theory was the Submarine and its embarked aircraft were going to go ahead of the fleet and act as some form of early warning. A curious developmental dead end as adding a hanger and all the other gubbins seriously hampers the Submarines ability to do a rapid dive. I think those navies that still retained that kind of Submarine in the second world war found more use in using the hanger for cargo transport in high risk areas.
A number of navies experimented with the concept most notably the Japanese who also came up with the idea of using them as a system to attack the Panama canal. A flawed plan in my opinion as the aircraft wouldn’t of been able to carry enough munitions to do any serious damage to the canal facilities.
There have been some more recent concepts of launching drones from Submarines, some kind of compact solution that will fit in a VLS silo or torpedo tube.
Not particularly J-20, the RD-93 derivative is a mature engine. It benefits from newer material technology and computational fluid dynamics input into its design. The Chinese probably brought them with a fairly hefty spares package before passing them onto Pakistan. Also it is probably an interim engine for the PAF with the WS-13 taking over as the definitive power plant in later batches.
Oh I get it!
PAF – Polish Air Force.
Just for reference most people regard the Pakistan Air Force as the PAF, I believe the Polish air force call themselves the WLiOP.
Bit difficult for the PAF to retire the Iskra considering they don’t operate the type.
The PAF uses in the training role:
PAC Super Mushshak
Shenyang FT-6
Cessna T-37 Tweet
K-8 Karakorum
The Indian air force uses the Iskra!
Amen on that WinterStars!
All I can say is anybody who wants a funny take on that strange time of change should watch this film:


Very curious how the Phantom “dominated” BVR.
The Phantom was not exactly packing that great of a radar.Finally was scewed the results of those trials was the DDR pilots had precious little air time in the past several years.
The old girl did surprisingly well if flown with its abilities.
In respect of radar if we are talking about the F-4 ICE then its no contest as it is fitted with the AN/APG-65 which is vastly superior to the fairly basic system fitted to the DDR Mig-29.
Also don’t dismiss the AN/AWG-10 and AN/AWG-12 fitted to earlier Phantoms they are excellent radar sets with good track range, target discrimination and resistance to clutter. It also has the advantage of a dedicated WSO/RIO over the overworked pilot of the early generation Mig-29. In NATO exercises during the 1980’s AN/AWG-10 and AN/AWG-12 USAF and RAF Phantoms could see, track and engage F-16A with early AN/APG-66 which is a newer more modern radar before the latter had even seen them!
Most of the comparative performance testing was done by ex Luftwaffe Phantom drivers, logical considering they had a good understanding of F4 performance making comparison easier. I have heard rumour that some USAF F-15 drivers spent time on the squadron as well.
We certainly shouldn’t judge Mig-29 performance on the basis of the DDR pilots certainly.
Once the Luftwaffe got rid of most of the useless ex East German pilots and put ex Phantom pilots in their Mig-29 the results were interesting.
BVR or long WVR using Radar guided missiles the Eagle dominated pure and simple (for that matter so did the Phantom), the radar fitted to the Mig-29 at that point was just obsolete in comparison to the latest western systems (with the caveat that we hadn’t seen the best Russian radars fitted to the Mig-31 and Su-27) . WVR Mig-29 was lethal albeit that was in many ways more down to the AA-11 and helmet mounted sight combination. Then again the early model Mig-29 the Germans operated were almost Bingo fuel by the time they could get WVR.
What bemused the West German air force pilot community was doctrinally the East Germans favoured the old style GCI tactics of Eastern Europe and didn’t make the most of what the missile HMS gave them capability wise…then again I add a cautionary note to that conclusion: I think the Russians kept the DDR pilots on a very short leash!
In the end those early Mig-29 were designed as an affordable (even disposable) replacement for the Mig-23 and its main area for operation would of been the FEBA.
CEC offers so much over Link-11 and mitigates the Type-45 class reduction to a degree. By the looks of it CAAM will have a bit better reach so data linking it to a Type-45 could maximise its capability. Imagine what capability a RN task group would have with Type-45, Type-23, Type-26, QE class, Merlin ASaC and F35B (radar on the Lightning is so good that with data-linking the type could have a secondary AEW role) sharing data like that.
Interesting CEC promo video:
Think it will be quite a while before we will see any Fixed wing UAVs on a QE class, money is pretty tight right now, CEC has just fallen victim to the MOD’s econmising under the last planning round.
Really disappointed that CEC has been kicked into the very long grass! CEC makes up for in many ways the reduction of the Type 45 class to six by turning the Type 23 and 26 into missile bins for the more capable AAW destroyer. Also makes our fleet more interoperable with the US.
Actually Lockheed Martin put up a nice video (cartoon :D)this week with an De Zeven Provinciën class frigate using its SMART-L to queue missiles launched from an Arleigh Burke class destroyer: