As I understood it from a thread somewhere there is an exclusive contract with the Airtanker consortium to in flight refuel UK military aircraft. This I think made sense when the CVFs where meant to have F35Bs as there does not seem to be any possibility of a tanker going on board. The concept of an F35B buddy tanking another one gets a bit interesting thinking of the weight problems to say nothing of the setting then up to do it.
Does anyone know if this will be a problem?
Well technically the AirTanker consortium could put up a fuss but considering we haven’t heard a peep out of them when it was announced that a tanking capability was being explored for the QE class makes me wonder if somebody has taken them to one side and said: “look guys before you get your lawyers out over this, consider we are paying the consortium billions of pounds over the next 27 years for this rip off…oops cost effective solution to the UKs tanking and transport needs. So can you cut us some slack on this?..”.
On a side note surprised nobody has mentioned the new Brazillian navy Trader COD/Tanker conversion. I’m really looking forward to see them along with the AEW variant. If they put Searchwater 2000 and Cerberus on the AEW variant I wonder if the RN will take a look.
So no evidence then just so we are clear…jeez!
No, it turns out that the IAF actually recommended the Rafale, not the Typhoon. Cost differences also worked out in favour of the Rafale, but the IAF backing it must have tipped the scales. There was a clause in the DPP that allowed the GoI to go with the non-L1 bidder if needed it.
As things stand, the IAF clearly must be elated to have gotten what it wanted all along. The Rafale fits the needs of the MRCA in the IAF almost perfectly.
Why would you say that the Rafale would have been underbid by Dassault? In all contests so far, they have been cheaper than the Typhoon and since early on, rumours were floating that the Rafale bid was 5% cheaper than the Typhoon’s.
Evidence for that? Oh sorry you have none!
Stop spinning something that the Indian MOD deny! Both aircraft met the technical requirements to reach the final round. Both aircraft had advantages in different areas. Nothing has been officially released to avoid protests.
Stop persisting in spinning rumours that have no basis!
In the end there was no particular need for the M4000 with the French air force. Avionics wise it offered no particular advantage over the M2000 and they didn’t need the unrefueled range. Performance of the M2000 with tanker support was more then adequate.
So its only chance was the export market which it would of been hobbled due to the lack of domestic sales. If the Americans hadn’t wanted to sell the F-15 to Saudi Arabia then it might of succeded but as that became a non issue it didn’t have a chance.
As just like the EAP and Typhoon the M4000 became a very useful tool in the Rafale development program I call it a success.
Indeed if it is something important we will find out soon enough.
Curious. A-stan appears to be fairly normal at the moment, a lightning reinforcement of the Falkland Islands as an object lesson is possible but I see unlikely.
Intelligence that a country with lots of British nationals is about to go down the tubes requiring a rescue mission…thats possible. Egypt maybe?
OK I respect that, just remember that calling someone out as a troll is pretty much the forum equivalent of going nuclear.
Oh and I don’t mind jokes about Astutes bad luck, frankly the Navy need to be shown up over crashing a brand new sub in well charted waters. Also that crewman going loco with a gun…looking at his profile I wonder how the navy thought he was suitable for service.
Anyhow lets go away from this as friends;)
For Christ sake I was joking!
Of course it was not limping home in the footage…I was making a joke based on the FACT that the AK has needed heavy maintenance to her boilers after prolonged cruises! I am not trolling or seeking to troll Russian equipment or the country! That you think I am trying to be a troll is deeply offensive to me!
This a forum which can have some jolly banter! I have never had any issue with Russian equipment or the nation, then again I am not afraid to point about problems I percieve with their equipment.
I am a long term member of this forum and whilst I have had my disagreements (usually the Rafale fan brigade – made ironic by the fact I am part French) with people in the past I have NEVER been called a troll!:( That you level such a title at me for such a mild joke based on a certain degree of truth offends and upsets me!
I apologise if I have offended you but don’t throw around the term “Troll” so lightly!
Not really. Maybe in this case an honest comment made in jest.
The AK has needed serious maintenance after every major cruise. I’m curious to see if the same goes for this one, is that stupid?
I have no particular axe to grind over Russian equipment. I also expressed some opinions about early Mig29s today and I stand by them as I don’t particularly see them as unsubstantiated or controversial.
Yep nothing like watching the Admiral Kuznetsov limping home to dry dock for her customary post cruise overhaul.
Well I’m going on Germanys experience with the Mig29 vs F4 and Indias early years of service were hardly glowing. Get in close with a good pilot, HMS, the R73 missile and an early Mig29 is a nasty foe but you can’t get around the primative nature of its avionics and radar. Its short legs and lack of situational awareness is also a given.
Going on North Koreas lack of fuel, lack of training, lack of force multipliers and obsolete tactical doctrine and I think it is totally fair to say their Mig-29 hasn’t got a snowballs chance in hell of surviving a dust up with the South Korean air force.
P.S. Don’t forget there is an F-5 with an F-22 kill out there…
Oh they will nicely compliment the five 052C class AAW destroyers that is being purchased for the Swiss navy…
F-5 is slippery opponent flown by a well trained pilot and give me a late model F-4 anyday over an early Mig-29 it has a far better radar and greater legs.
😀
Indeed it is a rather handsome colour scheme, rather a pity it is no match for anything fielded by the South Korean airforce. Early model Mig-29 have terrible situational awareness and short legs. Even South Koreas earliest Block 32 F16 would dominate it in combat.
Cheery looking lot…
The two military officers appear to be propping him up…literally.
Actually to me it looks like they are trying to stop him running away.
More seriously it looks like he is a figure head stroke puppet and real power lies with his aunt and uncle who are both high up in the central council.