dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,236 through 2,250 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: CVF Construction #2035063
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Some of the loudest critics of the carriers have been ex senior brown jobs!

    The fact is each service is perfectly happy putting the boot into the major procurement projects of the other two services!

    Also as far as I am concerned the Pongo’s have been getting away with some truly horrendous procurement mistakes by flying the flag of “its our lads fighting out there”!

    FRES
    BOWMAN
    FIST
    LMAWS(R)
    AS90 barrel upgrade (plus South African ammunition that didn’t meet standards – how the h£ll did they make that mistake!?)
    SA80

    Lots of Pongo officers kept in work behind a desk doing fascinating army of the future concept studies for Gucci kit that doesn’t work in the end, of no use and over budget when there was something perfectly suitable off the shelf!

    in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2320451
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Dassault close to UAE deal on Rafale jets -paper

    Yawn! How many times have we seen that reported…

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2035162
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    You have a good blog Liger30 your fascination with our armed forces certainly make you an honorary Brit.

    I’m in the south of Italy week after next for a holiday, trying to find out what interesting historical military sites to visit aside from the Roman stuff. Also I have taken out the full Super damage excess waiver for the hire car, I have heard its essential down south of Rome as drivers down their have a unique driving style that ensures dents in your hire car!

    in reply to: Libyan Air Force – Resurrection #2321861
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I don’t see what use Libya would have for Type 26. Libya needs a local navy, mostly to protect its EEZ. More like a coast guard, really.

    Some helicopter-capable OPVs such as those meant for Trinidad should be useful, & maybe also a few of something more heavily armed, such as the Nakhoda Ragam class. I’d say that’s the upper limit of what they need, but the NRs might be over the top. If I had to choose between them & the Trinidad ships, it’d be the Trinidad lot, no question.

    BTW, Brunei has already paid, so will get the money if its ships are sold.

    One each of the two Konis & two Nanuchkas is reported to be intact, having been seized by rebels at Benghazi. They may not have been operational when captured, though. There were about 15-20 FACs & minesweepers reported operational of a fleet of 30 before the war. Remove any unusable missile launchers, overhaul engines etc, replace old sensors with new COTS stuff, & you should have enough non-helicopter-capable patrol vessels, even allowing for wartime losses.

    Sorry I started the Type 26 thing:D it was meant in jest considering UK gov seems to be asking every country in the world if they would like to participate in the Type 26 program…I have been half expecting a government press release saying Switzerland and the Vatican City have been offered a chance to participate in the program and how it is an opportunity to modernise the naval defence industries of both countries…;)

    in reply to: Rebuilding UK Carrier Strike after a decade's gap #2035308
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I have pondered if the USN ever considered a tanker variant E2 but I presume it would never of got far considering they already had types performing that task.

    As for an E2C purchase by taking on ex USN airframes as they introduce E2D, that is an interesting concept. I had already suggested that E2 should be purchased to operate alongside the French. This idea makes it more solid in my mind:

    As long as Grumman could bring them up to the standard as the ones in French and somehow zero time their trap cycles it could be cost effective. As I have said before the French have wanted an extra Hawkeye for quite a while. If we purchase three airframes that would be attractive to the French. Set up a naval air squadron to keep the books square but operate and maintain them from Toulon, rotating the aircraft between the CdG and QE class carrier during peace time with mixed crews. I don’t see it being a major burden for a NAS to operate out of Toulon and in the event of an emergency the UK owned ready airframes and personnel are deployed to the ready carrier. In the future the FAA and Aeronavale could share the costs of upgrades by the economies of scale. As for general maintenance we save the cost of setting up a full logistics structure in the UK and work some agreement with Grumman over parts supply.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2035317
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Think we need to send you a quality telephoto long lens Cockneyjock!

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2035386
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    To be honest the RN got their first, a Prince of Wales has been in service with them long before the Vietnam war.

    Changing to PofW as an acronym is only going to lead to confusion in the forum, calling it PoW here is not meant to mean nany offense to this American organisation or the Royal Family…actually I doubt it has crossed anybodies minds up to this point.

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Personally I don’t think the CIA should be messing around with armed drones but as the article says they are an excellent way of tracking the bad guys.

    As for the legalities of drone use, I place that under “a grey area”. The drones are unmanned but they also have a man in the loop the drone itself being a very expensive radio controlled plane. Man in the loop makes them no different to a manned jet or helicopter when it comes to effect.

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well personally I think we should consider reneging on the 1987 IRBM treaty relaunch production of the BGM-109G Gryphon then base the system on a new facility where these hippies want their peace garden at Greenham common. Finally in honor of Helen John the person who started the protest the updated BGM-109G should be renamed after her, even better maybe each launch vehicle should be named after prominent members of CND who protested at Greenham.

    I would think the tree huggers would be so upset over the new BGM-109G Helen John launchers at Greenham that they wouldn’t have time for Waddo!

    Also it would be amusing watching them trying to sing songs about how they don’t want “Helen John” at Greenham.:diablo:

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2035453
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    If you look carefully at the videos moving LB03 you will see the answer, the block is built on a series of widely spaced jacking points. The lift truck slides between those points.

    in reply to: Rebuilding UK Carrier Strike after a decade's gap #2035465
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Which turns my mind to those Traders that the Brazilians are having converted to tanker configuration by Marsh aviation. Might well be a far cheaper option with the added benefit of gaining a moderate COD type.

    Unfortunately despite heavy searching I just can’t find a website for Marsh aviation so getting a project update is near impossible.

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Now this is really what makes my bloodboil and shows how these guys work to twist events to their designs, taken from their website:

    MOD ANNOUNCES RAF WADDINGTON VIEWING ENCLOSURE TO BE CLOSED ON 3RD SEPTEMBER ON ACCOUNT OF THREATENED VIOLENT DISORDER BY PLANE SPOTTERS.
    August 28, 2011
    By admin

    Plane spotters, through the website http://www.fightercontrol.co.uk, who use RAF Waddington’s public viewing area known as the WAVE have been publicly threatening the use of violence and intimidation to people protesting the use of armed unmanned drones at RAF Waddington, or UAVs .

    Despite pleas to his customers for calm and sensible behaviour by the owner of The Sentry Post snack bar and shop in the viewing area the threats have led to an announcement by the MOD that the WAVE will be closed on Saturday 3rd September.

    A Ministry of Defence spokesperson announced the closure at the Direct Action Station website, where many of the threats to protesters have been made.

    Protesters have commented that following recent public disorder in the UK, some who were seen as inciting violence and public disorder in the UK have been jailed for 4 years. They expect the police will ignore similar behaviour by ‘aviation enthusiasts’ as the police are not known for applying the law with any consistency, more usually applying it selectively according to their political instructions

    So somebody makes a silly ill-concieved comment about burning tents obviously with no real intent and its twisted into “Plane spotters,…publicly threatening the use of violence and intimidation”.

    Remember these guys are media savvy and would like nothing more to spoil the hobby of military aviation enthusiasts due to their hate of anything military.

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well um this is a sign for the Peace camp, you know I do wonder if General Atomics should of chosen a less death related name for the drone…maybe the MQ-9 Fluffy bunny?

    http://www.indymedia.org.uk/images/2011/08/483734.jpg

    Oh and beware those murderous geeks!

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Yeah that’s what I find bemusing after all the noble talk of Gandhi like peaceful protest yet they have all that stuff about direct action including training videos. Actually those training videos were a hoot with all the mucking about with bamboo tripods.

    Whilst everybody is guilty of building an opinion then trying to fit what they see to that these guys take it to a new level. In the end as far as they are concerned “War is bad”, actually a statement I agree with but with the caveat that often it is unavoidable. They see the defence industry as utterly evil and to be battled against at all costs, add to that their odd view point of view that the defence industry is BAE Systems. They clearly have a very narrow view of drones unfortunately not helped by accidental killing of civilians, problem regardless if it is a pilot in a fighter jet dropping the bomb or somebody at Creech weddings in that part of the world do look like a minor battle. Drones have also saved many lives military and civilian alike but alas that tends to be missed by these guys, they are NAZI death machines to them and that’s it. Not that I don’t think there are quite a few problems with drones especially in respect of the decision make loop and how they would fair against a peer rival.

    What worries me is the moth to the flame scenario, spotters and locals alike have had a quiet time at Waddo will now have a whole load of increasingly bloody minded oiks turning up making a mischief.

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I did consider putting in General discussion but I feel debates get missed in their. Considering Waddo is a military airbase which will operate a military type and these hippies are probably keen on disrupting operations like the old days at Greenham I think it stretches to here. I say give it a chance but if it strays too far then by all means move it.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,236 through 2,250 (of 5,046 total)