dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,581 through 2,595 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: CVF Construction #2005196
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    MacTaggart Scott have just updated their website, no new news but it is interesting to see that Arresting gear/DAX-II is still shown as a product:

    http://www.mactag.com/92_OtherSystems.html

    in reply to: What future for the KPAAF? #2356799
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    North Korea is no embarrassment to China. They form a strategic buffer zone and China will seed them whatever equipment they deem necessary to maintain the strategic buffer. If any new hostility broke out in the DMZ I could see China flying in J-10’s or shipping in HQ-10 to balance the power along the border.

    The strategic buffer thing was important to China in the past but things have changed going on the recent wikileak:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/29/wikileaks-cables-china-reunified-korea

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11871641

    The fact is the PLA can regionally handle America these days so the need for a buffer zone is pretty much none existent. China is more interested in the trade opportunities of working with South Korea and no longer having a highly unstable neighbor. Unification would mean lots of trade opportunities for Chinese companies and have the bonus of weakening the South as it pays for a costly reunification process, in effect a win win scenario for China!

    As for lack of investment in the KPAAF which was the question stated in the thread, considering how it would be pulverized within days if not hours by the South and America in a war investment in long range missiles on mobile launchers is a more logical choice.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2357093
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Frankly its a rather paranoid report for domestic consumption rather then really focusing on the realities of the situation. India’s military budget is seven times larger then Pakistan’s!

    Even with the significant modernization and induction of equipment Pakistan is still at a significant disadvantage. I disagree with the reports idea that India has always had a technical advantage over Pakistan. Actually up to the 80’s Pakistan had technical superiority in several areas which India mitigated with its vastly superior numbers. In a technical sense the dark period of the 90’s was where Pakistan fell behind and it can be argued the recent procurement is necessary to bring their forces up to scratch.

    I do agree with the report that the Indian procurement process is very problematic leading to long lead times and significant overspend.

    I would argue that modernization of the PAF brings back some conventional balance and reduces the risk of a nuclear exchange between both nations.

    in reply to: Japan launches F-X fighter RFP #2361399
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well I expect Dassault/French gov will be a bit tetchy about not getting an RFP.

    in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2361450
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The UK will induct at least two F35B for testing as the final construction is too far gone.

    In respect of initial testing its not too much of a disaster as the avionics and systems are common. My hunch is further down the line we will shift them to America or Italy. Actually Italy would make good sense as they would be interested in continuing the Ski Jump qualification trials for Cavour. Effectively British tax payer has built them a nice Ski Jump states side for testing!

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #2005940
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well I think once Pakistan has spent some time using their F-22P Zulfiquar class frigate we shall get a better idea about where Chinese quality control is.

    Its certainly been known that the feedback from earlier exported vessels led to a bit of a stink within their domestic shipbuilding industry.

    in reply to: Argentina joining KC-390 program! #2361651
    Fedaykin
    Participant
    in reply to: Argentina joining KC-390 program! #2361653
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well an important step forward in the modernization and recapitalization of the FAA has been made.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2005962
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    And AEW is a fundamental requirement as well, late model Hawkeye is pretty much the best at it.

    I would also say the control element and the ability to peer into the airspace that you are launching strikes into makes it an important capability for strike missions.

    As I said its pretty much wishful thinking unless something can be sorted with the French, certainly not something to be dismissed and lets just say I disagree that it doesn’t fit into the platform requirement.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2005993
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Hmmm, I think you are over egging the strike thing Jonesy. Its pretty well known that there are many in the RN who would love the capabilities that Hawkeye brings to the table.

    Fact is there is little money at the moment but as you point out a greater relationship with the US and French brings up interesting possibilities.

    As I have suggested before the French would love to get an extra Hawkeye but have been budget restricted.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2006043
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Hmmm I think its more of a case that Bofors are part of BAE SYSTEMS group, better to show one of their own products as an option. In reality any end customer could specify whatever self defense systems they wanted hard kill and soft kill.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2006078
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    If that brochure had come out four to five years ago I would of said it was aimed at the UK. The plan at the time was to buy another Ocean type vessel as a replacement at the end of this decade. Financial crisis and SDSR pretty much put paid to that idea. It could well be BAE Systems showing they can play in that market. Difficult market to break these days considering what else is on offer from Spain, France and South Korea.

    in reply to: One killed in HMS Astute nuclear submarine shooting #2006272
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well going on this news update I would say damage almost certainly was caused to the control room:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13020502

    Unless damage is really minor she will probably have to go to HMNB Devonport for a look over and repairs. Lucky they are fairly close the the RN’s Nuclear Submarine service centre.

    in reply to: One killed in HMS Astute nuclear submarine shooting #2006348
    Fedaykin
    Participant
    in reply to: One killed in HMS Astute nuclear submarine shooting #2006354
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I guess that the next captain of HMS Astute will loose his job.

    I would considered it very problematic that an armed employee of the state behave that way – but it is even more problematic that this happened on submarine with an very dangerous and risky propulsion.

    Well thats to be seen! Certainly the officers of the vessel especially the captain would undergoe some very tough scrutiny. A break down of discipline that leads to a crew member shooting another is a serious business. Considering how close a submarine crew work it would be expected that any crewman going through emotional issues or a breakdown would be noticed.

    I dread to think what the reaction in the admiralty was when the news broke! A PR disaster!

Viewing 15 posts - 2,581 through 2,595 (of 5,046 total)