dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,316 through 3,330 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 12 #2431077
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    New Delhi and Paris close to inking deal on Mirage-2000 upgrade. So the deal includes the price for new weapons as well..no news on the M53-P2 engine upgrade or a new engine, so my question to the French members would be, what is the life time of a M53-P2 ? Even if Snecma doesn’t manufacture any more new M53-P2s do they deep overhaul it to allow it to be used for a longer time?

    Wow has France and Dassault finally realised that if they want to sell Rafale to India they need to get the costs down on the Mirage 2000 upgade!

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2006851
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well it depends what Pakistan wants to use it for, without the STIR and MK13 she is pretty much in the surface roll an OPV but she would represent a significant improvement in ASW with her SQS-56 and SQR-19 towed sonar array. Add a helicopter with a dipping sonar and your really talking in respect of that role.

    I don’t think its worth refiting the STIR and MK-13 considering the limited number of missiles left for the launcher. Actually if they do want an anti air missile capability they are probably better off fitting the LY-60N 6 cell box launcher from the Type-21 Amazon/Tariq class as they are retired.

    in reply to: Falklands War 2010 #2431085
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Things have changed, the main enemy (and the only one for the past 140 years) of Argentina was Chile, but now is one of the countries with which Argentina has the best relations, including the military (as an example, a joint peace force, called Cruz del Sur, was created in 2009 by both countries). Chile felt betrayed by England (or UK if you prefer) when Augusto Pinochet was enjailed there in the late nineties after the request of a Spanish judge. This lead to the pressure by Chile to let the Argentineans visit the islands and now Chile is the country that presents the Argentine claim to the UN decolonization committee every year. Yesterday, Chilean president, Michelle Bachelet, stated that now they ceompletely support the Argentine position. She also said that the new president, Sebastian Piñera, will continue support to Argentina on this. This is because we understand that the differences with Chile were between military governments and those are part of the past we will never repeat.
    Brazil also support the Argentine position, as always, but a surprise that Argentina didn’t expect, was the total support of the former British colonies of the Caribbean, most of them are part of the Commonwealth. In 1982 only Chile, the Caribbean countries and the Guyanas didn’t support the Argentine position. Argentina doesn’t expect military support from the Caribbean countries, but it’s important that none of the Latin American and Caribbean countries were against the Argentine position and that all of them agree to sign a document to support Argentina. This was never reached in the past and it’s a good precedent for the Argentinean position.
    Chavez, despite he can be a big military help, is a problem for Argentina, because he always talks more than he has to. Anyway, sometimes he says what everybody here thinks but it’s not politically correct to say it. For us, Chavez is only something funny to laugh about.

    Well Chile didn’t feel betrayed enough to stop them buying British defence equipment like 3 x Type 23 Duke class.

    in reply to: Rafale M a possibility for RN if F-35 axed (Times article) #2006856
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The F/A-18E/F is just to large, heavy and expensive for what the CVF is or is planned – it would chew up the carriers spotting factor very quickly in my opinion! (although I could just imagin the RN having a wet dream about the want for the added ‘Bling’ which comes with the Super Hornet family – such as the EF-18G Growler……….)

    Sorry but you are just plain wrong, whilst I’m not advocating purchase of the Super Hornet the CVF are over 65thousand tons and could easily accomodate an airgroup of this type.

    in reply to: Serbian Defence Industry, pls no flaming #2431273
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    True , nothing has been invested , I would say for even more then 10 years , most likely, closer to 20 years …but expertise is still there (just barley)
    Also there is political dimension.Iraq needs new equipment , and if hey buy everything from USA that will be ammunition for many internal Iraqi political elements to accuse government of being just US government political puppet , so it makes sense to buy equipment from 3rd source…who is better then from country that was attacked by USA.Also it is possible that , eventually , there will be “technology transfer” to Iraq so that they can produce many of those items locally. Arms sales is never straight forward business transaction …there is always political dimension behind it.

    I also have a sneaky hunch that America tacitly supports procurement from Serbia if it helps normalise Serbian industry by bringing in hard currency.

    in reply to: Phantom Upgrades #2431472
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I’d say at this point high maintenance costs on F-4’s are already fairly common so making the engines smokeless probably doesn’t add all that much to what is already a fairly expensive airplane to operate.

    The period between overhaul is important for any service, whilst the time would of increased over the life of the J79 with the improvements introduced it is still going to be shorter then a modern millitary turbofan.

    As a pure turbojet it will run hotter then more modern engines, as far as I am aware the smokeless upgrade involves running the combustor even hotter then usual which introduces the reduced time between overhaul and increased cost.

    If you run enough Phantoms then reducing the overhaul period gap and increasing the cost will become a significant metric. Certainly the Germans didn’t include the upgrade in their own Phantoms when they did the midlife update later in their life for just this reason. The idea being with the addition of AMRAAM they were a BVR platform and the smoke trail would be a non issue.

    As Phantoms are retired in the remaining services who operate them there should be an increased pool of spare engines meaning you could add the upgrade without increasing the cost metric in the same way.

    in reply to: Falklands War 2010 #2431578
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Or the CN-235, or any one of half a dozen others.

    Indeed! Pretty much whatever company provides the best contract.

    in reply to: Falklands War 2010 #2431582
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    My only thought if Oil is found that Falklands gov do the sensible thing that Norway did and bank any revenue and spend a proportion of the interests. That means when the oil runs out you have a continuing increasing income from the interest.

    in reply to: Falklands War 2010 #2431584
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    If the Falklands gov wanted an MPA they wouldn’t go for the MRA4 prototypes, way to expensive to operate with an entirely usless to them ASW fit.

    Something like the Bombardier DHC- 8 MPA would be far more logical and affordable, if there was an oil boom requiring helicopters to support the rigs and an MPA to patrol the fields more then likely it would be contracted out to a company like Bristow with a new heliport closer to Stanley to operate the helicopters. Probably plenty of space at Mount Pleasant to operate any MPA like the DHC-8.

    http://www.kustbevakningen.se/documents/Flyg/501-presentation%20skrivskyddad.pdf

    http://www.arabianaerospace.aero/media/images/stories/dahs_2.jpg

    in reply to: Falklands War 2010 #2431683
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Various sources suggest that only about 20 are in service (& not all serviceable), the remainder being in reserve, & possibly cannibalised, though doubtless they could be restored to service given a little time & money. 4 are two-seat trainers.

    Yep when I double checked I got that figure as well.

    Thanks for the heads up.

    To be honest I think the first thing Argentina should do if they want to modernise their airforce is to buy a couple of second hand Boeing 767 and get IAI Bedek to do its tanker conversion, I would then also suggest they get a lot less precious about only buying American and French and have a close look at the Chinese JF17 and Russian Su30 and what these types offer them at a more affordable cost bracket.

    in reply to: Falklands War 2010 #2431693
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    They can easily repell an Argentine air attack.

    The important aspect is the radar on the Falklands in combination with fighters on QRA which have a good range of operation, BVR missiles and supported by a tanker.

    The best fighter in Argentine service is arguably the multi roll A4-AR Fightinghawk, it is the only fighter they have which can get out to the Falklands without tanker support but using an economic flight profile. The Fightinghawk is also a WVR only fighter with an early variant AN/APG-66 radar and two AIM-9M Sidewinder. In many ways it is equivalent to an early Block F16.

    To overwhelm a QRA detachment usual tactic is to send lots of aircraft until the defending aircraft can’t regenerate quick enough and they get caught on the runway refueling.

    Argentina has 34 A4-AR and not all of those are serviceable, to get to the Falklands with a meaningful weapons load they will need to refuel in the air and because of the dire situation with tanking in the Argentine airforces that means some of the strike package would have to provide buddy tanking rather then participate in the strikes.

    So Argentina launches it first strike package they will be picked up by MPA radar and the RAF QRA birds will get off with a full load of fuel. They proceed and if its a hot war engage the Argentine strike package at BVR range and then possibly close to WVR and finish them off with their superior ASRAAM. At the same time the reserve birds on MPA are being prepped and the VC-10 is already off the runway ready to tank up the QRA birds. The second Argentine strike package if they have enough left will need to wait until the buddy tankers have topped up before they can go, by that time the RAF QRA flight has returned to MPA to regenerate and the reserves are intercepting the second Argentine strike package including the tankers followed by the QRA birds.

    At the end of the day Argentina has no A4-AR left and the RAF SAR bird has had a busy day picking up Argentine pilots.

    For Argentina to overwhelm they either need many new single engine fighters like the Mirage 2000 with tanker support or many new twin engine fighters like the Su30 that can operate out over the Falklands without tanker support.

    The four fighters operated out of MPA is a carefully measured number which the RAF would calculate as been greater then the regeneration rate of the Argentine airforce…its all fuel and maths in the end.

    in reply to: Return of the Arsenal ship, kind of #2007166
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Since the consensus seems to be that the Type 45 is a little limited, especially in VLS storage, I wonder if arsenal ships might not be the way to change that, well arsenal boats really, nothing as grand as the USN was proposing in the 90’s, 4 simple hulls (capable of keeping up with the Type 45) with minimal radar fit (just enogh not to bump into things), each little more than 128 strike length VLS with engines and room for a minimal crew, with the ability to run fully unmanned over secure comms w/CEC, could be just the thing, not only does it increase the number of available missiles, but it also puts some more distance between the destroyer and the missile when it enters the engagement envelope. I’d also feel a damn sight better about sending what is in essence a barge into harms way than putting a £1billion destroyer in the firing line.

    Is this a good Idea or am I crazy?

    Alas CEC is a frozen project for the RN but in this scenario the Type 23’s and their replacements would act as Arsenal ships for the Type 45.

    Once they go over to CAMM which is an active missile the Sampson on the Type 45 could queue the missiles on the Type 23/replacement.

    in reply to: The not quite naval stand off with Argentina #2007168
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    not to be unhelpful but, if they simply send a few A4s to attack the drilling platform, it’s possible they get to it before they are detected if there’s no AWACS in the area… flying right down on the surface of the sea, the ground based radars may have trouble detecting them before they are in position… unless you have those typhoons patrolling permanently on top of the platform, one air raid may very well be sufficient

    Way too much of an escalation with high risk of failure.

    in reply to: The not quite naval stand off with Argentina #2007170
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    RAF Mount Pleasant changes everything. Putting aside the state of the Argentinian Air Forces and Navy for a bit, I think that the fact that the British correctly spent monies to build up the infrastructure was the smart play. A flight of Typhoons, A reinforced company of regular troops, a company of Falklands Defense force reservists and a world class Air base protected by SAM’s is too tough a nut to crack for Argentina before the E-3’s, Tornado’s, Nimrods, C-17’s and submarines show up. This is certainly much more formidable than (due respect) a platoon of Royal Marines, which is what Argentina faced 28 years ago.

    Building the base, though expensive, means that the task force route like what took place in 1982 will never be necessary again.

    Indeed something I have said many a time before, the only jets that Argentina has with the range to get to the Falklands without tanker support are their A4 and they don’t have enough in a servicable state to overwhelm the Typhoons.

    The Radar, Typhoon, AMRAAMS and Tanker give the UK the high ground.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – V #2431726
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I wonder if something bigger than 500E could fit in there? Selex have been offering arrays tailored for different noses, e.g. the 850E shown last year.

    Certainly, the 500E is intended for the small noses of trainers, legacy Mirage, Mig21/F7 and the F5.

    The Grifo S7 has a 60cm centimeter antenna so a similar size AESA module I would think. In the end the modules are the same whatever the radar, Selex can customise by adding and removing as needed.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,316 through 3,330 (of 5,046 total)