dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,916 through 3,930 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2070628
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    What worries me is the lack of Phalanx mounts in the navy, there are 16 I think?

    Considering the Type 45 will need 12 of them in the end doesn’t leave any fat for other projects.

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2070631
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I think the key point we are all starting to understand is it has to be from the MOD’s parts bin.

    The 30mm canon that the Rivers etc use is sufficient for most tasks the C3 will face, I think the solution is fitted for but not with as is often quoted. So put the hole in for the Mk8 but plate it over and fit the 30mm. Even better make it modular like the MEKO concept and then it’s even more attractive on the global export market.

    in reply to: Su-34 vs F-15E – design and performance #2476268
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I must admit what I like about the Su34 is that you can work in a shirt sleeve environment and it has a toilet – very handy for long range strike missions.

    in reply to: Airborne Laser Completes Laser Ground Tests #2477431
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    ] So the Boeing/Northrop team fired the big boy today!

    *OFF-TOPIC ALERT*

    “Don’t be too proud of this technological terror you’ve
    constructed; the ability to destroy a planet is
    insignificant next to the power of the Force.”
    – Darth Vader (CV James Earl Jones), Star Wars Episode IV:
    A New Hope (1977)

    Yeah but Star49 would still say the mighty Russian armed forces could take on the Deathstar:diablo:

    in reply to: South Korea – ROKAF. Photo Achieve #2477433
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The North Korean Air Force would last about two seconds vs the ROKAF. Then its army would be crushed……….and let’s no even talk about its Navy!

    In many respects your right but that doesn’t change the fact that South Korea’s capital is in artillery range of the DMZ. Any initial exchange would be VERY bloody for civilians especially south of the line.

    in reply to: Iraq looking to buy F-16's??? #2477435
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    And a few other countries. Those retired S-3s have more airframe hours left than a new-build fighter. They’re not bad with their current sensors, & could be upgraded quite easily, e.g with a new surface search radar. They can carry a good selection of anti-ship & ASW weapons, have good range & excellent loiter time, & I think quite modest operating costs. There are vast quantities of spares available, so long-term support isn’t a problem, as you can stock up on everything you might need. And the last I heard, the Yanks weren’t charging for the aircraft themselves, but only the delivery, spares, manuals etc.

    For that matter the RN took a look at them for the new carriers in respect of an AEW platform – I think it was along the lines of searchwater.

    in reply to: Iraq looking to buy F-16's??? #2477438
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    And a few other countries. Those retired S-3s have more airframe hours left than a new-build fighter. They’re not bad with their current sensors, & could be upgraded quite easily, e.g with a new surface search radar. They can carry a good selection of anti-ship & ASW weapons, have good range & excellent loiter time, & I think quite modest operating costs. There are vast quantities of spares available, so long-term support isn’t a problem, as you can stock up on everything you might need. And the last I heard, the Yanks weren’t charging for the aircraft themselves, but only the delivery, spares, manuals etc.

    Yep its a crazy crazy world we live in. I think I am probably a member of the very big group of people who all say why the HECK did they retire such a useful type!

    Have a look at the A6E and A7E sitting at AMARG and its pretty much the same situation for many airframes.

    in reply to: Iraq looking to buy F-16's??? #2477477
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The swedes are trying to offload several dozen A & B versions. Give them an option for Americanized updates. These are much less of a long range threat to Isreal than F-16’s that have decent mileage left in them.

    I come back to my previous point, why do you think a small number of F16’s with no tanker support or overflight rights be any risk to Israel? Any Iraqi government would have to be insane to tweek the tale of that tiger!

    in reply to: The MiG-25 Unsurpassed interceptor #2477482
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Time to let this thread die I think;)

    There is no point arguing with a Fanboy however sincere and helpful we think we all are.

    In effect we have had forum members from all sides of the argument tell firebar that in effect he is wrong in so many respects. I think we should all have a whip around and send him a die cast model of a Mig25 that should keep him happy…

    in reply to: Iraq looking to buy F-16's??? #2477485
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Give them a chance to buy Americanized Gripens instead. We don’t need a government that is not particularly trustworthy at this stage owning such an air force in such proximity to Israel.

    Do you seriously think a few even late block F16’s are going to cause Israel to loose any sleep:rolleyes:

    I think the C130J and more Mi17 helicopters would be the first priority for Iraq, I certainly see the F16 being inducted a few years down the line (I will buy a pint for everyone if they got anything else:D).

    A few years back I would of also said surplus out of AMARG but now new build is the best way forward. Most of the F16 airframes at AMARG are worn out or broken down for parts, same goes for the F/A18’s and F15’s. The real shame is the row after row of low mileage A7E and A6E sitting at the bone yard, quite a few had been retired long before they had used up all their traps. The S3 Viking would also make a useful maritime patrol type for Iraq as well.

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2070854
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    For me 28 of Jonesys proposal is just what the industry requires, its also at the bread and butter end of the export market which is something Bae Systems has never really understood. Vosper’s on the other hand has had some mild success in that market. If the design can be kept affordable and importantly moduler then there is great opportunity for export sales off the back of a large RN order.

    I hope BVT don’t focus too hard at the expensive end of the market, most countries only want corvettes and small frigates.

    in reply to: AWACS invaluable asset or sitting duck? #2477933
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Ok I see how near is nearby then? Do you know if an ew suite is fitted?

    Depends who? The RAF Sentry are fitted with an EW suite as far as I’m aware.

    in reply to: Venezuelan K-8s #2478693
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Of course the interesting thing will be the engines, they will have to use the chinese WS-11 powerplant as I can’t see the American unit getting release.

    in reply to: Taiwan to mass-produce antiship missile. #1785641
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Does make you wonder why they signed up to buy more Harpoons recently though. :confused:

    Available quickly off the shelf!

    Its going to take time to induct a new supersonic missile…Harpoon is a simple choice to Bolster their defences quickly.

    Considering the rapid improvements in the PLAN not a bad idea.

    in reply to: KC767, KC45 ….. Latest news! #2482741
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Let’s recap:

    The original 767-based offer was considerably larger than the airplane it was replacing (KC45 EW = 265,000, KC767 EW = 181,000). Boeing had a couple of bad eggs who broke the law on the original bid. Those people got fired, paid big fines, and went to jail. We have now had mission creep and a foreign owned firm that does not support U.S. foreign policy wants to provide an airplane that is almost 46% larger (by empty weight) than the 767 based platform (which was large to begin with, KC-1355R EW is only 99,000 lbs). They’ve dressed up their pig in makeup by offering to produce it in a red state, because the military people who make the selection currently have red civilian masters. But the money gets appropriated by a blue Congress. Meanwhile, those heros in white scarves with stars on their shoulders, who claimed they desperately needed these tankers 6 years ago, are soldiering along just fine.

    Them’s the facts.

    No the contract was won by an American firm (Northrop Grumman) who partnered with a foreign owned firm. As for EADS it has never stated its stance on American foreign policy, its a firm interested in selling its wares not passing comment on American policy.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,916 through 3,930 (of 5,046 total)