dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,051 through 4,065 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MEKO 360 #2077534
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Any excuse to get my Trafalger celebration photos out πŸ˜€

    It was Meko Alley down there what with the ANZAC, Aradu as well as a Greek and Turkish example of the type. Remember I uploaded those pictures of the Sea Zenith mount Ja.

    Aradu was rather beat up with a sodding big dent down the side, if I remember she had been laid up prior to coming to the UK and they had only just repaired her for the journey. I do wonder how many of her systems were actually active!

    P.S. Notice it was taken off the deck of the Romanian Type 22 (which one slips me I’m afraid) and INS Mumbai.

    in reply to: Nimrod fleet grounded. #2457447
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    We have a dual problem with the MR2 fleet.

    Firstly they are being operated beyond their intended out of service date and secondly the modifications made during and shortly after the Falklands war.

    By adding an air to air refueling capability to an aircraft that wasn’t designed for it in a hurried manner to help the Falklands operation and then operating the fleet with said mods to this day is bound to have ramifications.

    With the Hercules fleet the pipework was able to go along the top of the aircraft and straight into a fuel tank nice and neat, on the other hand the Nimrod AAR mod requires the plumbing to travel through the airframe.

    in reply to: Chinook Bravo November #2460344
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well I would of liked to listen to it as I have a soft spot for Bravo November … looks like she has a long life still to serve before she is retired to a Museum.

    I wonder who will get her? I would of thought the RAF Museum would like to have her in the collection as well as IWM Duxford.

    in reply to: Chinook Bravo November #2460500
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well I would listen to it but it requires Real Player and I won’t install that pile of bloatware junk on my computer.

    in reply to: What else is in Taiwan? Mirage 2000-5 #2463275
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    So the F-16 is a more versatile and multi-role aircraft, than that of the Mirage 2000-5EI in Taiwan service.
    I have read that the Mirage 2000’s SNECMA M53 engine is a fuel guzzler (more akin to a turbojet, than that of a turbofan!)
    I am very tired of hearing that poor old Taiwan has to settle for second best when it comes to the purchasing of weopan systems – minimal offensive capability, by the West to appease the PRC!

    One has to remember that Taiwan used the purchase of the Mirage 2000, as political leverage to gain the sales of the F-16, which it had always wanted in the first place, from its so-called ally – the United States.
    It’s amazing how American weapons industry lobbying can tern its Congress around, when they are missing out on sales and $.

    Saying this I think Taiwan is right to want and push for indigenous design and development of its military equipment!!!!!!!!!!!!
    I thought it would have been interesting if Israel had of teamed up with Taiwan to continue its development of the Lavi, before Israel hoped into bed with the PRC.
    A great opportunity missed?
    And the J-10 may never have been?

    Regards
    Pioneer

    Alas Taiwan is in a very difficult situation when it comes to defence procurement. In many ways they have passed the point where they have a qualative advantage over the PRC, the role of the arm forces now would be to stall the PLA long enough for America to become involved.

    The Mirage 2000 whilst probably the second choice over the F16 is a very important asset. It has an unrestricted avionics, radar and missile fit along with a performance profile which makes it highly suitable for the QRA role.

    in reply to: Turkey-Future Aviation Capable Ships #2078403
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Does anybody have information on Turkey’s future requirements for Aviation Capable ships i.e. Landing ship with dock (LSDH) or other types.

    Well there was a thread about this a while back but after a quick look I think it has been nuked.

    An off the shelf design I would think.

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2465504
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Including the rather offensive “France” as a dirty word attitude from many American pundits.

    Its a European company NOT a French one.

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2465687
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    From The Washington Times, April 24, 2008:

    Some of the points are open to question, but this letter shows Congress’ perception of the issue. It also shows that getting funding for the KC-45A will be problematic at best.

    What made me chuckle is this point from the article:

    Ultimately, the Air Force chose France’s Airbus over America’s Boeing, a decision that could prove to be disastrous. Boeing has a proven jet tanker, but Airbus has never built one used by any of the world’s air commands.

    Ignoring the tankers built for and operated by the Canadian and German Airforce’s also the proven tanker they are talking about is still a paper plane whilst the Airbus is flying now in a configuration close to what the USAF will get.

    in reply to: Russia may sue China over pirated fighter #2466183
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Avionics and missiles are sub par compared to russia or west but since china will be looking for desperate customers like pakistan and zimbabwea it might be ok.

    Bit of a sweeping statement there I would say.

    I agree that in many areas China is behind the curve but that certainly not universal across their defence industrial areas. In some areas they are as good or even superior to the current Western/Russian state of the art.

    Frankly things are moving too fast in China for us to make a clear judgement.

    in reply to: CVF #2078619
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Personally, I don’t see it as a surprise. Yet, does that translate into no French CVF or no 2nd Carrier period???:confused:

    I would say no carrier which is unfortunate for the French navy.

    I think the French were expecting to build some of the Super blocks for the RN carriers but from the recent orders especially the Steel it looks like that isn’t going to happen.

    in reply to: Strange HUD on Spanish EF-18A Hornets #2467163
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I know Kaiser did an Avionics upgrade a few years back for the Spanish Hornets so maybe a new HUD was part of the contract.

    On another note I found the warning in English about unfiltered power on the carrier deck amusing.

    in reply to: Drone shot down over Georgia #2467621
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I have a hunch that the truth is the pilot had a choice over what to use and decided on missile. Both weapon systems have there merits in this situation and would both of been effective.

    Also don’t forget that the pilot probably requested authorisation for the shot, well for that matter it might of been a GCI intercept and the decision of weapon system used wasn’t in his hands. Don’t forget that Russia is very big on GCI.

    in reply to: CVF #2078697
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    An interesting situation developing in France:

    http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3488563&c=SEA&s=TOP

    in reply to: Drone shot down over Georgia #2468071
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I think the Russians have been caught bang to rights here but I doubt they are going to own up to it.

    Out of curiosity how many Hermes drones does Georgia have now?

    By the way another video:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/7361429.stm

    in reply to: F-111 vs Pelican #2469260
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Oh well a trip to AMARG for a replacement nose is required.

Viewing 15 posts - 4,051 through 4,065 (of 5,046 total)