dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,606 through 4,620 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Can someone confirm this??? Saeqeh enters service #2574143
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    You were out of line sunshine, so stop trying to explain it away.

    Oh and the difference is that western women have the choice to exercise their potential freedom. Ever heard of the case of the Iranian women executed becouse SHE was abused by her father? 😡

    As were you Sealord.

    Just drop it life is too short. 🙁

    in reply to: Saudi Rafale deal progressing… #2574147
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Come on lads, see sense. It’s all true, but the report neglects to say that they’re naval Rafales. The Saudis will need them for the aircraft carrier they’re buying from France. The options are for the 2nd carrier they’re thinking about. :diablo:

    I think I want what your drinking Swerve… :diablo:

    in reply to: Saudi Rafale deal progressing… #2574163
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Utter Hogwash!

    The helicopters and naval stuff are probably a cert but as has been reported by La Tribune the Rafale has only been included in talks.

    TALKS could mean anything! Most likely France is still trying to persuade Saudi Arabia to consider the Jet. That doesn’t mean it has been or is going to be sold to the Saudis.

    The Typhoon deal is the real thing….. 😀

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2574599
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    True yet J-10’s equipped with WS-10A’s could be a option? Has anyone heard more about the progress of the Chinese Turbofan??? 😮

    Its spent alot of time on the test bench accumulating hours and has now moved onto test flying on an IL76 engine test bed and recently a J-11.

    Considering the recent purchase of over a hundred AL31F for the J-10 to meet PLAAF needs I would of thought that WS-10 production will focus on being supplied to future batches of the J-11 for the moment.

    What China really needs is a local powerplant for the FC-1/JF-17 if they want it to be successful on the export market.

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2574601
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I would agree except I don’t see why Iran hasn’t at least purchased a small number of Flankers??? :rolleyes:

    I believe the main problem has been Russian reluctance to reveal detailed technical data about the construction of the Flanker and its systems to allow technical soverignty (ironically the same problem that the UK has had with America over the F35).

    Remember when Iran was an American client state they were effectively given the capability to construct their own replacement components. I think they find it hard to move from that way of working and become reliant on an outside parts source.

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2574631
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    What a mess 😀 But will any Russian involvement with the WS-10A affect export? I know Chinese made Flankers can’t be exported due to clauses in the license agreement.

    No effect at all I would of thought, I think the Russian input was mainly theoretical.

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2574640
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Won’t that cease to be an issue when the WS-10A matures? I thought that was the projected powerplant for the main production variants of the J-10. Or is the WS-10A a license built Russian design, I thought it was a Chinese design? Either way, barring any licensing issues, I would be quite surprised if the J-10 doesn’t see at least some exports to a few select customers within the next 5 years even if they take second place to PLAAF needs.

    Now the WS-10A is a funny old project :rolleyes:

    The core of the CFM56 was used as the template for WS-10A development, the core of the CFM56 is based on the F101-GE-102 which was developed for the B1-B. The GE F110 fighter engine is based on the F101 making it a sister engine to the WS-10A.

    The main problem for China has been getting the metals right and the program was stalled until the Russians helped.

    in reply to: Can someone confirm this??? Saeqeh enters service #2574660
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Why is it that just about every topic on this forum nowadays degrades into this incessant bickering?

    Anyway, what advantages would having twin tails have other than propoganda?

    Well it probably does has some form of advantage, it is scaled up from the F-5
    making it similar to the Northrop F-17 which in itself is a scaled up F-5. If we ever do get a good structural and size drawing I would love to compare it to the Northrop F-17.

    As for the Bickering I have to agree, Sealord maybe Flex297 got you wrong but your first statement was overly simplistic in it’s description of the Iranian nation and it’s people. Whilst I have no like for the nastier elements of their government and I deplore their punishments especially the Death Penalty by in large the people are moderate, well educated and modern. Prior to the 2003 Iraq war it was easier and alot safer to travel to Iran then a number of the Arab nations in the area.

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2574683
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The major barriers against any sales push with the J-10 is the Russian engine and the focus on forfilling local PLAAF needs. For the moment the FC-1/JF-17 will be the focus of any export sales.

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2575362
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I wouldn’t consider Egypt as likely as it gets alot of aid from the US. On the otherhand Iran is a intersting idea! Seems like a mixed force of Flankers and J-10’s would be ideal…………….(i.e. high/low mix)

    Egypt is a difficult one to gauge really as they like to spread around their defence purchases. In recent years they have obtained American, Russian, European and Chinese equipment. The K8 purchase was a big surprise to everyone but it did involve development of their aerospace industry. A J-10 purchase would be a surprise but not unconcievable. The JF-17 would certainly be a good replacement for a number of their older types like the Mig-21 and foster independance in their defence procurement.

    in reply to: Tawian F-15? #2575398
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    It would be an excellent type for Taiwan but China would freak out over its sale to Taiwan.

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2575442
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    http://www.Sinodefence.com would be a good port of call ha27 for info about the J-10. Its certainly entered squadron service and has a number of developments planned for it over the next few years including thrust vectoring and the fitting of an indiginously developed engine.

    As for foreign sales the only country which has expressed a desire for this type is Pakistan. If it prooves to be successful I can see Egypt and possibly Iran considering it as well as a few other airforces.

    in reply to: CVF News #2042266
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The RAF had alot to due with the RN losing Big Carriers the last time around! Who’s side are they on anyways???? 😮

    Like all services……there own!

    in reply to: Interesting Video Thread #2576486
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Hey Fed, I think you would be a very rich man if you could design Chaff that would decoy a IR missile. would you like to rephase that sentance? 😉 Nice video and loved the music. 😀

    Hey I can only interpret what my eyes see. 😀

    Anyway its my birthday today and the alcohol is talking :diablo:

    in reply to: Interesting Video Thread #2576583
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Or this weird French dance music video …. Tres Tres MTV

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBouAU8u1xo

Viewing 15 posts - 4,606 through 4,620 (of 5,046 total)