Mark,
I believe you actually came to this conclusion in the old thread on MKIX wings and cannons a while back! π
Cheers
Paul
Sounds Familiar!
Bruce, Mark & Bentwingbomber, thanks for the info.
A similar question was asked on the Avi8 froum a while back (I wonder if Treadstone is MH434 on that board?) and I tried to answer it as best I could.
http://forums.avi8.com/forums/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001099
I was hoping some Spit experts and restorers might chime in! π
Cheers
Paul
So this is not a full scale replica then?
mick
By definition a replica shuld be something that has been either sanctioned by the original manufacturer or follows the plans to the degree that it’ identical.
I think the term ‘New Build’ is more appropriate.
Whilst it might not be exactly like a wartime built 190 (I believe a some mods and design changes have been incorporated as David points out – something that often happens to genuine machines as well), it never the less appears to resemble this rare German fighter very well.
As Roobarb says, with any luck, we will have the good fortune to see a type in this country for the first time since the war, and despite being a new build, it will surely raise a few eyebrows and get people talking! π
As it is, most people usually point out that restored Warbirds “Are in effect a new build” or ” a replica”, so the addition of another one should make no difference, should it? :confused:
Cheers
Paul
Yes – perhaps Roobarb will even sort out the colour scheme once and for all – its been done twice since the second ‘re-build’ and is still completely wrong.
Twice!
Lets hope it’s third time lucky then! π
I think the article that Daz mentioned did say that it would be “Repainted in a more authentic scheme” (I bet Roobarb is researching it now) and also mentioned it would have some extra fuel tanks installed and other cosmetic work.
I hope the latter means that the cannons will be fixed as well!
Btw, despite the dubious paint scheme and funny cannons, wasn’t this a ‘Stock’ restoration like TE476 i.e. most if not all the military equipment fitted, as per most of Mr Weeks other aircraft?
Cheers
Paul
I remember reading in one of last years FP’s an article on some of ARC’s Spitfires, and it mentioned talk of the possibility of the CAA introducing a category which allowed fare paying passengers to fly in Warbirds such as their TR.IX (PV202/IAC 161 whichever you prefer), as is the case with the Thunder City jets.
I canβt remember if they had proposed it and actually had talks with the CAA, or it was just a suggestion, but the argument for it seemed pretty sound to me. I think it makes perfect sense, and hopefully would open up opportunities for other Warbird and Historic aircraft operators who’s aircraft are on a Permit To Fly. And of course make it easier for your average Joe to experience a flight in a valuable piece of history! Whether it will ever happen I don’t know, but I’d like to think that the CAA would at least look into it and discuss the feasibility with owners/operators.
As a side note, one interesting thing the article did mention was that their two-seater can carry a heavier passenger (up to 260lbs) in the backseat than most of the other airworthy TR.IXβs, due to an adjustable bob-weight being fitted on the elevator circuit, as originally fitted to the IAC machines. This helps make it less sensitive in pitch and more like a single seat IX when two are on board.
I guess if you’re lucky enough and know the right people, you can get yourself a flight in a UK based two-seater (including the ARC machine), as the videos below prove:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sf54M3Hdmhc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAYOOefRPR0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3utjY5M_-vw
Cheers
Paul
The latest issue of Classic Wings announced this news last week, stating that the Fw190 A-9/N will be taken to Duxford for flight testing by the US owner who has just purchased it.
Interesting.
Is this ‘US Owner’ Tom Blair perhaps?
Cheers
Paul
Good to see we are all still remembering the ‘Master’.
Like most have said, it’s hard to believe it’s been a year since he passed on, and that the airshow season just doesn’t seem the same. π
Cheers
Paul
Thanks for the HU Daz.
As you say, shame about the sound & also the rapid cuts! π
Anyone know what this footage was shot for?
Cheers
Paul
Ah, the mysteries of the different MKIX/XVI cowlings!
This will tell you if a Packard 266 is under the cowlings but, of course, this engine was only exclusive to the Mk XVI during service so will not be of too much assistance today.
As in the case of MKVIII MV154/MT928. π
Accoriding to G-INFO, this has a Merlin 266, but if you look closely, you’ll see it has the earlier style ‘Flat’ Top cowling (attached is picture of it and one of TD248 for comparison) as fitted to MKVIII’s & early IX’s (I’ve never seen any wartime pictures of VIII’s with the later ‘Blown’ type).
I believe when this came up for discussion before, Mark12 mentioned that VoyTech had written a detailed piece on the various cowlings, something I still haven’t yet managed to get hold of!
Cheers
Paul
Very nice pictures Mark.
I believe it was Lee Proudfoot who ferried her from Halton to DX.
Anyway, good to see that TE184 might at last be put back were she belongs.
I must admit, I wasn’t sure at first if I liked the French scheme, but after a while I, think I’ve taken to it! Just a shame that we didn’t see more of it against the sky! π
When I saw her in OFMC’s hanger at DX last year, she looked like she needed a bit of work to get here flying again. One thing I did notice was that she was fitted with 85 gallon (I’m sure that’s what the stencils said) wing tanks and what looked like non standard skins (no gun bays) on the top of the wing.
Any one have any more info on this mod?
Cheers
Paul
DGH,
Many thanks for that. Most useful! π
Proplover,
The T.10 would be fine but if you have the info for any of the above MK’s and the MK22 that would be great! π
Cheers
Paul
Thanks for that response Roobarb and everyone else.
It was actually when I was comparing 434’s incorrect roundels that I noticed that the red on the port one looked a tad smaller. I know in the past roundels can at times look odd in photographs, and as Ed & Mark12 says, it maybe the angle and the dihederal and tele-photo lens that makes it look smaller.
I can’t imagine it being wrong, as I know you are pretty darn meticulous when it comes to authenticity, so I guess it’s just an illusion after all. π
So, case closed I think!
Btw, can OFMC be fined for repeatedly ignoring warnings from the Roundel Police? :diablo:
Cheers
Paul
If you don’t have it already and you want a greater understanding of the spin, you might want to purchase this:
Well worth it in my opinion.
Cheers
Paul
Farewell Breighton!
Just found this one on the Real Aeroplane Company’s page:

Reminds me of Ray Hanna flying the OFMC Buchon at one of the Fighter Meets in the late 80’s or better still, that sequence at the start of the BoB film were a Buchon is only just above a not so tall fence! π
Cheers
Paul
Welcome to the forum and what a very nice selection of pics! π
It was a very enjoyable show at a very nice location.
I really hope that the houses don’t get built, as I can’t help but think of how West Malling ended up. π‘
Cheers
Paul