The 1946 edition of the Mk.IX/XVI PN’s says
“[the rear] tanks should only be filled for special operations at the discretion of the appropriate Area Commander and normally their cocks should be wired OFF. If fitted in aircraft with “rear view” fuselage, they must not be used in any circumstances”.
Presumably they were so detrimental to the handling characteristics that they would only ever be used in wartime.
Like on the P51, when they fitted the 85 US gal rear fuselage tank, it caused severe pitch instability. Well, maybe not as bad as on the Mustang but seemingly enough to make handling in pitch unpleasant from the accounts I’ve read.
Interesting what the IX/XVI PN’s say about the cut-back rear fuselage versions. I’ll dig out the MKXIV PN’s to refresh my memory on what they say about those aircraft that where fitted with rear fuselage tanks.
Although not low back models, I believe that RN201 has a rear fuselage tank fitted as does SM832 & ML417. I wonder how often they use them or indeed if they fill them completely when used?
Nice to see more pics of TE311 Fluffy & UNC. 🙂
Cheers
Paul
Pete,
I think that the pilot for the Mustang sequence in Lovejoy was Rod Dean.
He was flying ‘Sunny VII’ which was at the time owned by Spencer Flack and was later destroyed in a fatal crash in the states. 🙁
Going back to the subject of Ray Hanna’s/OFMC’s film credits, anyone know what ‘No Bannanas’ was about? :confused:
Cheers
Paul
Now I’ve not seen any of this footage today, I’ve been too busy.
I don’t know why we are all moaning though, what else could be expected. Ok, its a news special feature but at the end of the day its broadcast for the masses not enthusiasts. Most of who proably weren’t aware of the anniversary in the first place and also probably not really bothered and have already forgotten. Its a specialist subject not on a specialist aviation channel. Yes its annoying when they get facts wrong but I would have thought most people watching ain’t bothered about hearing just merlin engines.
If I could I would have gone to Duxford but as it was I had other plans and as for not seeing it on tv, well, I don’t think I’ve missed much.I may be wrong or you may not agree but thats how I see it.
Neal
Good point Neal.
I know we’ve all moaned about it, but at least the BBC took the trouble to cover it and show it again in their main news slots.
Not a mention of it on the ITV national news at 6.40! :confused:
However, ITV Merdian S & Anglia W did show reports about it. 🙂
Cheers
Paul
Well, recorded the coverage on the Sky+.
Personally, I thought it could have been better. 🙁
As Denis points out, there were more than a few glaring inaccuracies in not only the report I linked to (Airfield Assemblies, 100 Airworthy Spits) but they continued during the coverage as well! :rolleyes:
Still, at least Tony Harmsworth put them right when he wasn’t interrupted!
Btw, anyone notice what appeared to be fuel vapour coming out of TD248’s Port wing?
Cheers
Paul
Thanks for the reminder Hairyplane.
I understand they’ve been running a piece on the 70th anniversary during the day. 🙂
Cheers
Paul
EDIT: You can view the piece here:
Kev, thanks for the HU. 🙂
I have recorded it to my PC.
A very nice tribute although I noticed they insisted on using the term ‘Stunt’ Flying! :rolleyes:
Cheers
Paul
Thanks for the update Fluffy.
Looking very nice indeed! 🙂
Like Daz, I’m looking forward to seeing another low back Spit in the air.
Cheers
Paul
possibly one reason for the proliferation of mkIX rebuilds is the availability of engines ; probably the most numerous of engines is the XX series, fitted to Lancs, Mossies, Hurris and a few post war prop liners ,even in this age of consecutively numbered rivets there still a few Spits flying with the XX series (which doesn’t fit the earlier mk A/C)
Surely you must mean the 60’s/70’s series(two speed, two stage supercharger) which powered the MKVIII’S & IX’s & PRXI? :confused:
The twenty series (two speed, single stage)was never used in any production Spitfires although I can think of an airworthy MkIX that is fitted with one. 😉
The MKI-V were powered by single speed, single stage Merlins and only a few have the correct series of Merlin fitted like the Shuttleworth MKV, AR501 & the TFC example EP120. BBMF use the later Merlin 35 on their ‘Baby’ Spits as does HAC on BM597, & I understand HFL soon to fly MKV JG891 is fitted with one.
Anyway, nice pics.
Thanks for posting them Darren. 🙂
Cheers
Paul
Thanks for the HU Quinny. 🙂
Cheers
Paul
So is a two stage Merlin longer or shorter than a single stage Griffon – as on the Mk XII? 🙂
Mark
I have a sneaking suspicion it is longer! 😉
Cheers
Paul
Happy Birthday Skybolt.
Have a good one! 🙂
Cheers
Paul
Looks very much like the late Reg Hallam to me also. 🙁
Cheers
Paul
You must stop teasing us!
Very nice indeed Steve. 🙂
Like the low pass Spitfire one too! 😀
Cheers
Paul
Very nice Tommy! 🙂
Got any more?
Cheers
Paul