dark light

Twinblade

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 1,627 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UAV news and discussion 2014 #2215951
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Is IAI Eitan an armed UAV ?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2215961
    Twinblade
    Participant

    UAV version of Dhruv cancelled. IAI is instead going with the European cousin of Dhruv, the EC-145.
    http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/ariel-view/2014/05/unmanned-helicopter-enthusiastic-customer-needed/

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2216136
    Twinblade
    Participant

    The new govt. is moving really quick ! Could give a huge boost to the manufacturing sector in India.

    Govt moves to hike defence FDI up to 100%

    The commerce & industry ministry has suggested a graded foreign investment ceiling. It has suggested a cap of 49% FDI for companies that do not transfer technology, while in ventures where the foreign partner is willing to transfer knowhow, the government intends to allow up to 74% FDI, and there will be no cap (100% FDI) for companies engaged in manufacturing state-of-the art equipment and machinery or those undertaking modernization projects.

    I can live with that. Also, please sell away non critical PSUs and OFB unit by unit, which manufacture nothing that requires critical technology, something that was proposed with 1991 reforms but still hasn’t been done till date. Keep the units that perform well (BDL), reform those which are mediocre (HAL, BEL, all govt owned shipyards) and sell away the rest whose roles have been essentially been made redundant by the private sector (BEML, MIDHANI).

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2029831
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Of course therein lies the Rub, when you go into the details about companies that have been black listed due to corrupt practices you will find it was local officials demanding the backhanders.

    If Indians could cry over their defence procurement, their tears would create a deluge in Pakistan and Bangladesh. St.Anthony wanted to keep his hands clean, blacklisted firms and suspended procurement merely on the allegations of bribery. I don’t have a problem with that procedure, it’s the absurd extent they went to blacklists parent corporations, sister corporations and even distant cousin corporations. So while bribes were paid in helicopter procurement, the MoD can’t deal with the naval systems division ? When the economy was booming, the armed forces couldn’t exhaust their capital budgets, now all the pent up procurements stand in their way and there’s a budget slump.

    Then there’s the indigenous development quagmire. Don’t issue any long term procurement plans lest MoD allocate funds and an indigenous option be available (the more basic the requirement, the more advantageous it is to hold it up, for the government firms will automatically fail to deliver on time with complex systems), don’t issue requirements till it can be labelled an emergency purchase (*cough* basic trainer *cough*), write up a note seeking emergency purchase, enjoy the bribes because government firms can’t bribe.

    Case:1 Army issues requirements for air defence guns, DRDO comes up with a gun as per SQR, Army changes SQR, the developer matches it and then it is changed again. 11 changes in SQR in 9 years and the DRDO tells the army to stuff it and refuses to play the game anymore. Army goes for several rounds of AD gun procurement, bribes are exchanged, everyone gets blacklisted and is now back to indigenous suppliers to procure guns.

    Case:2 Army Artillery. Don’t issue requirements to domestic manufacturers, deny quick incremental and cost effective upgrades to existing systems, go out for a dozen rounds of failed procurements, get everyone blacklisted, come begging to local manufacturers for incremental upgrade they were pushing for a decade back and recommend MoD to release funds for local product upto their requirements. But wait, there’s more, grape vine tells me that the SQR issued for the local gun are quite ambitious, so much so that the best guns available in the market will fail, let alone a domestic product which might need a few iterations, which will make a case for ’emergency procurement’ with diluted SQR all over again.

    And it all happened under the last defence minister A.K.Antony. St.Antony dressed in white, won’t do wrong and won’t do right.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2216294
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Has this been posted ?

    http://i.imgur.com/5Xk6bQtl.jpg
    ^^ Click for full sized photo.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2216380
    Twinblade
    Participant

    http://i.imgur.com/uB1c8evl.jpg
    ^^ Click for larger picture.

    R&AW’s new SIGINT platform undergoing testing in Israel.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2216413
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Although suspending the development of ones ramjet AAM will certainly put you behind the competition’s ramjet AAM effort, looking at it from any logical standpoint.

    That is assuming that Ramjet is the most optimum way forward in AAMs. Only the Europeans and possibly the Chinese have hedged their bets on a ramjet AAM. The Chinese still may have a solid motor AAM program, South African ramjet programs are dead and together with the Brazilians they aren’t doing anything revolutionary, US is heading dual pulse way with the new AMRAAM motor by ATK, Indians are going with Dual Pulse, Russians are also going solid motor way, Japan hasn’t made public it’s future AAM program if any and/or buy American, Israel may adopt Stunner missile for air to air role and/or buy American. That leaves the ramjet club rather lonely.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2216849
    Twinblade
    Participant

    What’s that?

    The electro optical package on Pak-fa including IRST, Laser designator, MAWS, DIRCM and possibly other stuff that might be unveiled later.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2216872
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Has any information about 101-KS system been publicly released ?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2216890
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Does anyone has an image of crystal maze stand off bunker busting missile/munition ? All images I have seen labelled as crystal maze have been of popeye II missile which is a much larger missile while crystal maze is only 80-100km ranged and with 80 Kg warhead. Also an image of Delilah cruise missile in Indian service, if there is any, would be much appreciated.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2216938
    Twinblade
    Participant

    India Looks Abroad for New Jet Trainer

    Back up plans. Also, pandemonium.
    http://thumkar.blogspot.in/2014/02/breaking-iaf-moves-ahead-with-ijt.html

    The IAF recently released a Request for Information for an Intermediate Jet Trainer (IJT) that would be used primarily for Stage-2 training of its pilots with a secondary counter insurgency role.

    The selected vendor will be required to discharge 30% offset obligations as per the provisions of DPP-2013.

    First thing first! The release of the RFI doesn’t mean the HJT-36 Sitara project is dead. Neither does it mean that the Sitara won’t be the IJT that the IAF ultimately ends up procuring!

    The RFI is likely aimed at ensuring that the IAF has a fallback if the Sitara fails to obtain IOC by June 2014 and FOC in reasonable time thereafter.

    Even if HAL surprises the IAF and the country by obtaining IOC in June, and FOC in December, its HJT-36 Sitara may not measure up to the QRs stipulated in the IAF RFI, specially those pertaining to Stall and Spin characteristics.

    An HAL rep told IDP Sentinel at DefExpo 2014 on February 7, 2014 that HJT-36 is likely to commence stall tests within a month. HAL has identified the point on the wing where the boundary layer flow is turning turbulent and breaking up leading to a pre-stall wing drop; HAL plans to use boundary layer energizing strakes to remedy the problem.

    What is clear to me as a pilot is that there is little chance of HAL remedying the issue by IOC. In a recent statement in parliament, Minister of State for Defense Shri Jitendra Singh hinted that stall and spin characteristic refinement could wait till FOC. That would be a big mistake, because there is really no guarantee that the problem would be remedied – ever! Besides, there is too much optimism in the belief that it could happen by December 2014. If it was that simple, it would have been remedied already. After all, it’s nearly three years since PT1 crashed in April 2011 following loss of control.

    HJT-36 appears in compliance of all QR’s stated in the RFI. Indeed, the QRs are likely to be an exact copy of the QRs given to HAL for developing the HJT-36.

    I will go to the extent of saying, the IAF’S Spin QRs are contestable as being overstated.

    Anyway, it’s for the reader to judge. Here is a summary of the IJT RFI QRs

    Luckily for HAL, there are few single engine jet trainers around. Two contenders could be Italy’s Aermacchi MB-339 and Spain’s CASA C-101.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2216989
    Twinblade
    Participant

    The t-50 bomb bays are very long relative with the AA-12, and wide enough to hold 3 missiles in each bay if the arragment is similar to the 22’s bay.

    Anyway, these bays are meant to deal with larger payloads.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]228556[/ATTACH]

    http://i.imgur.com/XH5IISC.jpg
    The depth seems to be more than sufficient for large payloads. With suitable launchers, smaller missiles can probably be staggered.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2217024
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Others had commented on side bays for short range IR AAMs, I still don’t see those personally.

    Has Sukhoi released any information on those internal bays?

    In this thread or last I posted a screengrab from a video playing at sukhoi pavillion at MAKS where it showed via graphics that they were indeed missile bays.

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2029980
    Twinblade
    Participant

    The Indian Navy will receive six MiG-29K/KUB aircraft in 2014 bringing to 13 the total number of aircraft delivered against a $1.5-billion contract for the supply of additional 29 MiG-29Ks singed on March 12, 2010.

    Director General of RAC “MiG” Sergei Korotkov, told the press in April 2014 that the company had delivered 7 MiG-29K/KUB to the Indian Navy by end 2013 and would deliver 6 more aircraft in 2014.

    On December 29, 2012, RIA Novosti reported that MiG had delivered in December a batch of four MiG-29K/KUB shipborne fighters against the second order for 29 aircraft, fulfilling its contractual obligation for the year 2012.

    RAC MiG completed delivery of 16 aircraft against the initial order for 12 MiG-29Ks and 4 MiG-29KUBs in September 2011.

    MiG is currently producing 16 aircraft per year. The remaining 10 aircraft to be produced in 2014 are earmarked for the Russian Navy, which placed an order for 20 aircraft (16 MiG-29Ks and 4 MiG29KUBs) in February 2012.

    MiG plans to nearly double production rate to 30 aircraft per year by 2017. In the past, the company has said it expects the Indian Navy to sign a third contract for 24 MiG-29K/MiG-29KUB aircraft.

    http://thumkar.blogspot.in/2014/04/indian-navy-to-receive-6-mig-29kkub.html

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2217030
    Twinblade
    Participant

    very nice vid Twinblade. 🙂

    Jai Hind was a very good documentary series. Hope they upload their archives for first two seasons in the future.
    ——————————————————

    http://thumkar.blogspot.in/2014/04/six-iaf-mig-29s-being-upgraded-to-mig.html

    6 MiG-29Upg have been delivered, 6 are undergoing upgradation in Nashik.

    Upgrade of the IAF’s fleet of 62 MiG-29 aircraft to MiG-29(UPG) standard is underway at Nashik, India with six aircraft currently being upgraded using kits supplied by RAC MiG.

    The upgrade of the IAF’s MiG-29 fleet started in Russia in 2012. It moved to India this year, after RAC MiG delivered six MiG-29(UPG) aircraft to the IAF, 3 in 2012 and 3 in 2013. The company has also supplied kits for upgrading the remaining aircraft to India fulfilling its contractual obligations.

    MiG Director General Sergei Korotkov told reporters recently, “In 2012 and 2013 we had delivered three planes each. We also delivered the technological kits that are needed for the assembly, repair and modernization of planes of the Indian Air Force. So, we have fully met all our obligations.”

    He added that the first six planes “are already at a good stage of repair and modernization” at Indian facilities. “These works continue. A large group of the MiG corporation experts are there. They, along with our subcontractors that participate in the project, transfer these aircraft and train the Indian colleagues to assemble planes.”

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 1,627 total)