sorry guys but im finding it really hard to grasp the fact that you think Ryanair arn’t safe to fly? If this was the case to the degree some members are mentioning then would the airline still be flying the hundereds (or thousands) of flights that they do everyday?
I accept the fact that locos (perhaps because of the shear nature of their business – high utilisation, low turnaround flights) dont commit to non-essential maintenace as regularly as BA or Bmi perhaps would do (even sweet wrappers in the seat pockets wouldnt bother me) but certainly dont accept the fact that they would fly “un-air-worthy” aircraft.
For one, i believe that a single accident involving Ryanair aircraft would possibly begin to be the end for the airline. i think the media would start its cheap fares = unsafe a/c hype and thus dramatically affect the turnover and profitability of the airline – particuarly after the recent media coverage about cost cutting luxuries from a/c and the subsidy rulings. If you think about it in a business sense do you think Ryanair wouldn’t have thought about bits like this through; looking at what results poorly maintained birds may hold for the airline in the long run!? :rolleyes:
Sign In
