dark light

Snapper

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 6,286 through 6,300 (of 6,311 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: EE P.1B XA853 #2104393
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: EE P.1B XA853

    I have a pic of XA847. Can’t find any codes on my other Lightning prints (cockpit shots etc). Anyone know where this is? I believe Bee Beamont is at the controls.
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3da5264235608eda.jpg

    in reply to: If anyones interested #2104463
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: Film versus digital

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 08-10-02 AT 07:57 PM (GMT)]Good point. I did indeed. What sort of halfwitted idea was that? Hoho. Change it webmaster! HTML indeed.

    (Read the instructions Snapper, read the instructions!)

    in reply to: If anyones interested #2104468
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: Film versus digital

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 08-10-02 AT 06:06 PM (GMT)]It’s going to be great in 20 years time when your CD’s can’t be read.

    Well, I use 35mm (Canons), I use Medium Format (6×9) and I use a D30. Different applications for each. However, unlike most people, I shoot aircraft with Velvia slide film – thats very slow, very fine grained, and very sharp. I must say that I find digital capture to have a very limited latitude (which is also true about slide film). I hate how it looks too smooth too – my eyes can’t quite get comfortable with it. I also don’t like the poor gradation between colour and tone. However, I love the lack of dust and scratches, the ability to change ISO between frames, and the White balance adjustments. I am a photographer (have been for ten years) and a printer (I manage a Digital minilab. My third.) My preferred medium is still, on the whole, film, but thats only down to personal preference. Quality / resolution is no longer an issue, though economics are.

    It’s going to be great in 20 years time when my slides change colour.

    It doesn’t like my picture. Have to click on it to get it up.
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3da31d1ee7af065e.html

    in reply to: If anyones interested #2104753
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: If anyones interested

    I have the Canon FS4000US, and it is absolutely superb. II thoroughly reccomend it. I scan in 42 bit colour, at 4000 dpi, and that gives me about 113mb files. I then (in Adobe Photoshop) drop it down to 24 bit, and resize to 12″x8″ at 300 dpi, as a Tiff file. This will print a VERY good 12″ x 18″ on true photographic paper on a Konica minilab. I usually archive them at 12″x18″ at 300 dpi, but for printing from, I gain no more than at 12″x8″ (and true photo paper only holds 300dpi).

    One thing with the Canon that I would reccomend is getting a decent scsi card. The Nikons have firewire, which is very quick, but the Canon gives only the choice of scsi or usb. I had to get scsi due to a usb issue on my motherboard, and to say I am impressed is nothing – both my Epson 1640 and the Canon literally fly! The overall quality is very high though, perhaps second only to the Imacon Flextight – and if you have the spare change for one of those, then you could buy a couple of EOS 1Ds bodies and a bagful of L series lenses!

    Try http://www.photo.net for opinions and info and opinions.

    in reply to: Help #2104788
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: Help

    Most welcome sir.

    in reply to: If anyones interested #2104813
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: If anyones interested

    Oh, and the high street labs aren’t worried. They are all buying digital minilabs like the Fuji Frontier, Konica QD21 etc now, so prints from smartmedia, compact flash, microdrive, Zip, Floppy, CD etc are all easy (and cheaper/better quality than home PC’s) to print than negs / slides. No dust being one major factor. The lab manufacturers are all going digital. Film will be here for a while, but how long? Canon and Kodak have just announced 11 and 14 megapixel full frame sensor SLR’s, so once the developing world goes digital, the factories will shut (First world is not the only consumer, so we have a little time left). The decline has begun – look at the range of film Kodak has killed off lately (or messed up!).

    Umm, sorry. That wasn’t very aviation related. I’ll get my coat.

    in reply to: If anyones interested #2104817
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: If anyones interested

    The Sigma 170-500 is a good airshow lens (I shoot Velvia handheld predominantly at Duxford, which aint easy, but with a faster film, you are fine). In Canon fit, its F4-5.6. Stick it on a Canon D30 and it goes up to 800mm. 500 is plenty for me though, and 800mm brings its own problems (plus I would rather scan my slides than rely on the crap I get from my D30).

    Oh, this is a Hawker Nimrod I think. Velvia (50 ISO) at Legends this year. The original tranny is nice and sharp. I seem to recall it was around 1/500 – 1/750 at F5.6. But then again, it was a while ago.
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3d9f7cbb42798184.jpg

    in reply to: Help #2104820
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: Help

    Click this:

    http://security1.norton.com/ssc/home.asp?j=1&langid=ie&venid=sym&plfid=…

    and choose virus scan. Let Norton check you for virus’s online – it will find them (many disable your virus software) and you will then know whether you have any. It won’t get rid of them though, but I run this once a month (in addition to weekly virus updates) to determine if I am in the clear or not.

    (If the page doesn’t come up, then go into http://www.google.co.uk and type in: “online virus scan”norton and click the link titled: Symantec Security Check

    in reply to: Help #2104885
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: Help

    Hmm. Do you clear out the temp and temporary internet files often? That soon clogs stuff up.

    DC=Double click.

    DC My computer, DC C (or whatever your hard drive is), DC Windows, DC Temp. Edit>select all>delete. Back to windows, DC Temporary Internet files. Edit>select all>delete. Go back to desktop.

    Right click the internet explorer icon, you are looking for internet options. Click on Delete cookies, delete files, and delete history.

    Then, finally (after emptying the recycle bin):

    Start, programs, accessories, system tools, disc cleanup. Then, Start, programs, accessories, system tools, disc defragmenter. Followed by Start, programs, accessories, system tools, scan disc.

    Most of these options are available on most operating systems, though they may be named slightly differently on each. I’m using Win 98 and Win 2000 (no scan disc option), and have done the same on Win 95. XP is different though (typical really).

    Thats something that will speed up ALL computers. Basically, your harddrive gets filled up with loads of unneccesary crap and files that you don’t need. Also, files get fragmented. Defragmenting takes forever though if you don’t do it regularly, soI advise you to leave it on and go out for a few hours. I defrag at least twice a week, and it takes a couple of minutes.

    Hope that helps. I am no techie, but thats a routine (a good one) that someone taught me. It works. May not be the exact answer to your problem, but it will be worth doing anyhow, and will help a bit. Of course, it will empty the address bar on the top of the screen, and you will have to log in to sites again, but that is no sweat.

    in reply to: FW-190 at Manching #2105050
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: FW-190 at Manching

    Typhoon or 109 (and not with a bloody Merlin engine either). How many P51’s do we now have flying around? There are plenty bits for rebuilds. Pointless. Zero’s and Oscars might be nice, but hows about a Spit and Hurri flying against a 109 at Legends one day? A Typhoon against a 190, what the hell is the point of a new build Mustang?

    in reply to: WWII Flight Sims – what's yours? #2105800
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: WWII Flight Sims – what’s yours?

    “getting a Gee Bee off the ground without killing myself, tight moves in a Spit, getting anywhere at all in a Defiant”

    ……….Strafing a heavily (flak) defended railway yard in a Lancaster (I just HAD to try!).

    Perhaps tasteless, perhaps not. I fly a Typhoon 1B in the markings of R7752 PR-G (Paul Richey and then Roland Beamont’s Aircraft as S/Ldr of 609) and sent pictures of it to Bee via the 609 Association. If it makes it more alive to kids (I admit I am just farting around for the hell of it) then does that not make it justified just a leeeetle beet?
    And Medal of Honor is brilliant. Until, that is, your computer screams in agony and refuses to play it anymore, it won’t uninstall, and you wife holds a knife to you throat / Mouse cable with threats of emasculation etc. Is not a war film tasteless by those parameters?

    in reply to: WWII Flight Sims – what's yours? #2106004
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: WWII Flight Sims – what’s yours?

    Microsoft CFS and CFS2. But not stock from the box. From various sites (mostly http://www.simviation.com ) I have downloaded extra campaigns, missions, planes, sounds, and other add-ons. Like massive amounts of flak, more realistic tracer, better gunsights, etc etc etc. SOOOOOOOO happy with my new Hawker Typhoon with Napier Sabre (real) Wav file and 8x 60lb RP’s. Had one of the Jane’s ones – great graphics, but didn’t really find it fun. Waiting now for CFS3 (and the add-ons people will come up with) in November.

    And occasionally, I have some lunacy – last night I sank the US fleet at Pearl Harbor with the cannon in my F14………..

    in reply to: anyone here like Mosquitos? #2106401
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: anyone here like Mosquitos?

    “On the same topic I recently bought Mosquito Squadron for Combat Flight Simulator 2 (OK I’m sad)”

    I’m sad too – but a cheapskate to boot: http://www.simviation.com

    The Typhoon for CFS and Typhoon for CFS2 being my favourites (I wonder why?). Plenty of campaigns and missions, as well as aircraft – all free to download – as well as other add-ons. And CFS3 comes out fairly soon – but still too long to wait.

    Who fancies a dogfight?

    in reply to: fancy a natter? #2106598
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: fancy a natter?

    I fancy any late war Luftwaffe jet.

    in reply to: Hello? Anyone there? #2107139
    Snapper
    Participant

    RE: Organising things in breweries

    “a) let people know in advance.
    b) allow existing users to retain their existing passwords and access rights, and
    c) if b isn’t possible, at least make sure the password retrieval and/or new registration process works”

    Bloody well said. Spent ages trying to get into the poxy forum last night. Pah. What is wrong with this one? Too expensive? I am fed up big time.

Viewing 15 posts - 6,286 through 6,300 (of 6,311 total)