dark light

VeeOne

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 397 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: So, The End Of The World Starts Today! #1861466
    VeeOne
    Participant

    Hasn’t the World ended yet??

    The Jesus believers have been waiting over 2000 years for him to return so I suppose a week is not too long to wait. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: General Discussion #322770
    VeeOne
    Participant

    I can hire this one out if need be http://www.smartwebcontrols.com/Images/LightningIcon.gif

    That’d do, Dr Strangelove!

    Will the moderators please consider adding it to the icons list? I for one would use it lots. ๐Ÿ™‚ ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: UFO or not #1861468
    VeeOne
    Participant

    I can hire this one out if need be http://www.smartwebcontrols.com/Images/LightningIcon.gif

    That’d do, Dr Strangelove!

    Will the moderators please consider adding it to the icons list? I for one would use it lots. ๐Ÿ™‚ ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: General Discussion #322774
    VeeOne
    Participant

    Faith? I guess I started that emotive mood by saying True-disbeliever. My apologies.

    I agree there are some who treat space visitors as a matter of emotional faith (after all they are surely here to save us from ourselves? And that is religious.)

    There are true believers on both sides of the discussion (materialistic TV scientists started it off by declaring that UFOs don’t exist and so on. A non-scientific approach IMHO).

    I have seen UFOs and they are not the natural or human things that deserve to be in our skies. So I am a true believer in that I know they are not illusion or mis-identification.

    But I don’t know WHAT they are. They ‘might’ be advanced non-human aerial vehicles. They might be something completely different. The main belief in the USA is that they are nuts-and-bolts spaceships or timeships. Unfortunately the USA is the main producer of books and TV documentaries. But here in Europe the main viewpoint is not the N&B theory but a more openminded view that they are real and exist but we don’t know as yet what they are or what they represent.

    My personal view, based on my first hand experiences and reports I have read, is that they can become real to the mark-one eyeball and to radar but at other times they seem to have a less physical set of properties that to me suggest they are something outside our current scientific understanding – maybe in intrusion of intellegence from another reality or dimension.

    It is too easy to replace Jesus for Space-brothers and a belief system cult results in either view if we are not careful. But these phenomena are pretty real and significant IMHO and anyone reading pilot-related UFO encounter reports will be impressed by the genuine nature of these ‘things’.

    Sorry to seem to preach! I honestly think reading pilot encounters would impress you guyz. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: UFO or not #1861471
    VeeOne
    Participant

    Faith? I guess I started that emotive mood by saying True-disbeliever. My apologies.

    I agree there are some who treat space visitors as a matter of emotional faith (after all they are surely here to save us from ourselves? And that is religious.)

    There are true believers on both sides of the discussion (materialistic TV scientists started it off by declaring that UFOs don’t exist and so on. A non-scientific approach IMHO).

    I have seen UFOs and they are not the natural or human things that deserve to be in our skies. So I am a true believer in that I know they are not illusion or mis-identification.

    But I don’t know WHAT they are. They ‘might’ be advanced non-human aerial vehicles. They might be something completely different. The main belief in the USA is that they are nuts-and-bolts spaceships or timeships. Unfortunately the USA is the main producer of books and TV documentaries. But here in Europe the main viewpoint is not the N&B theory but a more openminded view that they are real and exist but we don’t know as yet what they are or what they represent.

    My personal view, based on my first hand experiences and reports I have read, is that they can become real to the mark-one eyeball and to radar but at other times they seem to have a less physical set of properties that to me suggest they are something outside our current scientific understanding – maybe in intrusion of intellegence from another reality or dimension.

    It is too easy to replace Jesus for Space-brothers and a belief system cult results in either view if we are not careful. But these phenomena are pretty real and significant IMHO and anyone reading pilot-related UFO encounter reports will be impressed by the genuine nature of these ‘things’.

    Sorry to seem to preach! I honestly think reading pilot encounters would impress you guyz. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: London Heathrows safety record #479222
    VeeOne
    Participant

    Speaking of runway 23L in a few posts above, I have many nice memories of planes flying over my house when I lived under the flightpath for that runway, although by then it was only runway 23. Lots of wind and rain, even B747’s got blown about in those winds. Concorde always looked nice and stable though!

    Yes! I once watched 23 landings from a grassy knowl at the end of 23. Wow, what a lot of scary landings. Only an IL-62 chose to land cross-wind on 28Left. But neither of the two runways were really into wind and 35kts makes for demanding landings on such a short runway as 23 was.

    More rare were the opposite end landings on 05. When 05 was in use it seemed to be within high pressure areas and the northern arrivals would make an interesting long circuit around the western edge of the airport (over my home) and finally visually onto 05 (maybe it didn’t have an ILS on that end?).

    in reply to: London Heathrows safety record #479227
    VeeOne
    Participant

    I remember hearing in the early 1980s about a Fokker Friendship that had the gear retracted too early when lifting off 10Right and ended up scraping along to a stop on its belly.

    I think the ATC at Heathrow has done an excellent job over the years. Many of the near misses seem to have been near VORs which are used for SIDs and STARs where the SID instructions have been incorrectly flown. I recall several times a departing aircraft has climbed above to SID upper climb limit of FL60 (to Ockham for instance) and almost hit an inbound aircraft in the FL70 hold slot.

    Before ATC was privatised ATCOs were unable to report to the media such incidents as they were under the Official Secrets Act being government employees. So any UFO or Aircraft AirProx report was unable to be released the public.

    (UFOS: Forgive my over-imagination but I have seen too many pilot-reported UFO reports to think they are insignificant or illusionary. In fact, every report of a UFO AirProx seems to suggest the object deliberately flew a close pass usually head-on so a collision is unlikely as these objects seem to know what they are doing).

    I think it is only a matter of time before we have a SID/STAR collision within the LTMA though. So many of these incidents have been saved from disaster by pure luck (like the aeroplanes egressing cloud and seeing each other in time).

    in reply to: Curse this wind ! #413359
    VeeOne
    Participant

    Veering slightly off-topic, Propstrike, but taking the cue from your post – I was out walking the dog over near Panshanger airfield last week when I noticed what I took to be a Red Kite soaring aloft in the wind over the strip, and doing a good job of travelling backwards. I wasn’t aware that there were any in the London area, thanks for confirming my sighting.(Now an expert twitcher is going to post and say it wasn’t a Red Kite, but a Bengalese fish-eating Parrot or something).

    That’s correct, 91Regal. The Red Kite community has made it east toward the M25 I think (and as far west as Westbury) but not as far as Panshanger because the bird respects its ATZ. What you saw was undoubtedly a Bengalese fish-eating Parrot. Or a Yellow-breasted Nit Picker on a rare visit from Siberia. Neither of these birds respects aviaton law or nits.:cool:

    in reply to: BEA Vanguard PR photos #485931
    VeeOne
    Participant

    I think Duxford should have a Vanguard. (Bet it doesn’t have an Argosy either and that was military). Big mistake leaving out some of the British airliner heritage. Once they’re gone they’re gone. Not like the US airliners that were built in the hundreds.

    Duxford is the Imperial War museum yes, but when I used to fly in people to see the aeroplanes the airliners were always a big part for them (it helped that they could get on board them). Does Duxford only want to display aeroplanes that carried guns and killed people? If so that is a sad reflection on how we see our heritage in this country. And in a big war like the one expected during the 1980s with the Soviet Union Britain’s airline fleets would have been pressed into military transport service.

    I suppose the option of a Vanguard is now lost forever – you’d probably have to get one that could fly in. What a missed opportunity. ๐Ÿ™

    IL62m… here is a photo I took of your Monarch Britannia when it was untouched in 1983. It was the main thing on my list of aeroplanes to see. You didn’t have a Trident then or that would have been near the top too.

    http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/ab64/raggidoll/aviation/MonarchBritanniag-aovtduxford83sarah.jpg

    in reply to: London Heathrows safety record #479375
    VeeOne
    Participant

    And this is only the aeroplanes that crashed. Don’t forget the increasing near-misses in the LTMA between airliners inbound and outbound Heathrow.

    Not to mention the near misses with objects that were never identified (UFO or the military didn’t want to own up to losing a missile).

    I recall an Alitalia MD80 inbound to Biggin VOR reporting a very near miss with a cylindrical object which was never traced. The pilots made a big thing about that and I don’t blame them because it was either a lost cruise missile or something even more scary.

    And there was the outbound Concorde that almost hit a Twin Otter out of Luton over Woodley NDB at 6000 feet. Remember that? That might have been our first Concorde accident but for a few feet.

    in reply to: General Discussion #322848
    VeeOne
    Participant

    So itโ€™s all lightning then? :confused:

    UFO = lightning

    End-of-the-World = lightning

    Gods = lightning

    All the threads on GD = lightning :diablo:

    We are going to need a Lightning icon then! LOL

    in reply to: UFO or not #1861526
    VeeOne
    Participant

    So itโ€™s all lightning then? :confused:

    UFO = lightning

    End-of-the-World = lightning

    Gods = lightning

    All the threads on GD = lightning :diablo:

    We are going to need a Lightning icon then! LOL

    in reply to: General Discussion #322858
    VeeOne
    Participant

    I hope nobody with an overdeveloped imagination is listening-in on all those pilots talking about โ€˜silver ballsโ€™…

    …thereโ€™ll be a rash of UFO sightings! :rolleyes:

    Ah! A true-disbeliever. Oh well, someone has to do it I guess. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Has it occurred to you that rather than ‘some people’ having an ‘over-developed’ imagination, some other people might an under-developed imagination? I have found that when people actually look into the subject from a pilot-related pov, they take a more sincere approach to the subject. :diablo:

    Same thought to the ghosts-as-ball-lighting thought. No correlation whatsoever as far as I can see. I have never read a (so-called) ghost encounter that suggested it was static electricity in a plasma form. For one thing, ball lightning usually explodes at some point in the encounter. I have never read of a ‘ghost’ exploding! ๐Ÿ˜€

    The trouble with we human beings (and I know because I am allegedly one) is that we find it so easy to make pronouncements and judgements without knowing anything about the subject.

    I personally find the facts get in the way of a good prejudice or dumb idea so who needs them? Right? Isn’t that how the creationists think when they deny the theory of evolution (not proved as yet but a very gooood theory even if it might be wrong).

    CHEMTRAILS (heard of this one?)
    Coming to a conclusion without the facts or information is what makes the conspiracy peeps on another forum say airliners are spraying humanity with a mind control chemical. I told them it was not possible for such a thing to be done without thousands of peeps knowing about it but they say I am wrong. Chemtrails are real and jetliners the world over are spraying us daily. I tell them that contrails only happen when the upper tropopause is a moist airmass and that contrails are merely jet fuel condensed into cirrus ice crystal clouds but they are so sure that the conspiracy to dumb and control humanity is happening and the facts are not going to spoil a good conspiracy theory. You see they need something to beleve in and anyone with a camera can capture the conspiracy about our heads. It makes them feel significant in a world which deals insignificancy to all of us.

    Hmmmm…. Sad ๐Ÿ™

    in reply to: UFO or not #1861544
    VeeOne
    Participant

    I hope nobody with an overdeveloped imagination is listening-in on all those pilots talking about โ€˜silver ballsโ€™…

    …thereโ€™ll be a rash of UFO sightings! :rolleyes:

    Ah! A true-disbeliever. Oh well, someone has to do it I guess. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Has it occurred to you that rather than ‘some people’ having an ‘over-developed’ imagination, some other people might an under-developed imagination? I have found that when people actually look into the subject from a pilot-related pov, they take a more sincere approach to the subject. :diablo:

    Same thought to the ghosts-as-ball-lighting thought. No correlation whatsoever as far as I can see. I have never read a (so-called) ghost encounter that suggested it was static electricity in a plasma form. For one thing, ball lightning usually explodes at some point in the encounter. I have never read of a ‘ghost’ exploding! ๐Ÿ˜€

    The trouble with we human beings (and I know because I am allegedly one) is that we find it so easy to make pronouncements and judgements without knowing anything about the subject.

    I personally find the facts get in the way of a good prejudice or dumb idea so who needs them? Right? Isn’t that how the creationists think when they deny the theory of evolution (not proved as yet but a very gooood theory even if it might be wrong).

    CHEMTRAILS (heard of this one?)
    Coming to a conclusion without the facts or information is what makes the conspiracy peeps on another forum say airliners are spraying humanity with a mind control chemical. I told them it was not possible for such a thing to be done without thousands of peeps knowing about it but they say I am wrong. Chemtrails are real and jetliners the world over are spraying us daily. I tell them that contrails only happen when the upper tropopause is a moist airmass and that contrails are merely jet fuel condensed into cirrus ice crystal clouds but they are so sure that the conspiracy to dumb and control humanity is happening and the facts are not going to spoil a good conspiracy theory. You see they need something to beleve in and anyone with a camera can capture the conspiracy about our heads. It makes them feel significant in a world which deals insignificancy to all of us.

    Hmmmm…. Sad ๐Ÿ™

    in reply to: Landings at Indira Gandhi International Airport DELHI #486288
    VeeOne
    Participant

    Interesting aeroplanes! I like the military 737 photo!

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 397 total)