Canards – centre of lift
Where is the centre of lift relative to the centre of gravity on canard designed aircraft, like the Grippen, Typhoon or Rafale? I’ve always assumed that the canards provided a small component of lift.
PIRATE, full DASS, full sensor fusion, enhanced GPS, improved autopilot, SRP4 (software), phase 5 FCS for full flight envelope clearance, full DVI, AG weapons to name those on top out of my head.
Does the phase 5 FCS improve manoeuvrability to the extent it could be be noticed at an air display? The aircraft in the video is clearly a FGR4.
Which block is doing this RAF display?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chy5hE-G_BA
It seems to do some very tight turns (later on in the vid), greater than previous years at least 😮
Looks like a block 5 judging by the FLIR. Does block 5 have an advantage over the others?
I suspect that the plan is for T3A (40 jets) to be the last.
180 may not be enough for a full seven squadron force as originally planned, but where are the seven squadrons?
If the Oman order materialises might it come from the UKs 40 T3a batch?
Storm Shadow / Taurus
On which pylons will the Typhoon be able to carry Storm Shadow / Taurus?
The following site suggests up to 5 pylons.
IPA3 has actually been equipped with full DASS including MAWS and GT015 has received the PIRATE, these are the 2 aircraft to be deployed to the Swiss in november.
Is HEA available on either of these aircraft?
I’m surprised no FGR4 is being used to demonstrate self designation and other ground attack features.
Within weeks you can add PIRATE and HEA to the mix.
Jacko, could these features be available in the Typhoon to be used in the Swiss evaluations next month?
Why is the Typhoon heavier than the Rafale?
I’m sure someone will correct me if I am wrong but the Typhoon is about 20% heavier than the Rafale. I would have expected a design optimised for air to air to work out lighter than one optimised for air to ground. What are the relative features of the designs that leads to this?
I wonder how they know it was a Blackjack.
batch 4 block 8B (Phase 1 Enhancements) ~2012:
– New software based on RTOS
– improved MMI including display formats for AG weapons…
– Ability to attack AA targets, while continueing AG run
– new radios
– Improved MIDS (increased transfer rates; improved communication with ground units)
– imrpoved DASS (new ESM/ECM, maybe improved TRD)
– Captor-D additional AG modes
– new GPS (probably DGPS)
– IFF mode 5 likely
– unspecified external changes (maybe Apex strakes or already CFTs)
– weapons: full Litening II/III, IRIS-T (digital), EGBU-16 and Enhanced Paveway IV
As the Enhanced Paveway IV only weighs about 500lbs are there plans to include a dual load pylon for this weapon as part of block 8B?
No they will have block 5 software (FGR.4), but they won’t use the version with austrere support.
Why not?
I notice that ZJ946 and ZJ947 tranche 2 Typhoons made their first flights recently. It would appear that these are going to be delivered to the RAF and not the RSAF as RSAF Typhoons will be designated as ZK. According to this website http://www.targetlock.org.uk/typhoon/production_uk.html the RAF will be getting 7 of the first Tranche 2 Typhoons. I understand that these aircraft will only have the F2 software and not the ‘austere’ air-to-ground software of the FGR4. If this is the case they would seem ideally suited to the Falklands operations.
New Software based on an RTOS. Improved MMI for simultaneously AA/AG, new radios, improved DASS & MIDS, probably Mode 5 IFF, full integration of Litening LDP and IRIS-T, EGBU-16 & EPW IV dual-mode bombs.
What addition features will be included in the full integration of Litening?
When will the helmet mounted sight be available? It seems it has been delayed.
P1E
What will be included in the scope of P1E? Will Brimstone be included?
I had heard that the first Typhoon incident (front wheel didn’t come down), was difficult to pin down, the aircraft was recovered to a workshop where it was jacked up and the aircraft powered and the wheel went up and down without problem.. I’d love to hear if they ever pinned it down, there were ‘extra’ checks made before each flight on the front wheel are they still current?.
I spoke to a 3 Sqn pilot about the nose wheel problem and he told me that they had located the cause of the problem to an Italian made component in the front undercarriage and that it had now been resolved.