dark light
Airliner World
Combat Aircraft
AeroPlane
Flypast
Airforces
Aviation
Pcpilot
Air

PLA

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,381 through 1,395 (of 1,747 total)
1 2 3 … 92 93 94 … 115 116 117
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 5, 2004 at 10:02 pm in reply to: Contract Signed (for the 10th time) #2671788
    PLA
    Participant

    ah… arrogant barking started. Not even intrested in the idea of discussing it on ingtellectual basis.

    March 5, 2004 at 9:49 pm in reply to: US's new CHARC #2671825
    PLA
    Participant

    how fast would that be? 🙂

    March 5, 2004 at 9:49 pm in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2671829
    PLA
    Participant

    :)…

    March 5, 2004 at 9:47 pm in reply to: Contract Signed (for the 10th time) #2671836
    PLA
    Participant

    Then training starts and spare parts flow and usage (it is not a small mig21 remember) have to be optimized… I do not understand why so many signs are released. But we are used to the 120 MKI or M2K stories… I hope they will start the LCA. Much more intresting then more of the same.

    March 5, 2004 at 9:28 pm in reply to: Contract Signed (for the 10th time) #2671854
    PLA
    Participant

    Last time the Chinese had signes the deal and the planes had even been tested and fitted with the dish… We all know what happened then 🙂 The can sign it 100 times but it takes time to land in dilli and besides that I think the Pakistani government has some clear opinion about giving the Indian more dangerous toys.

    March 5, 2004 at 6:18 pm in reply to: PAF over Afghanistan [Russian Perspective] #2672054
    PLA
    Participant

    Well.. well.. another low level attempt from the Indian squad…

    March 5, 2004 at 6:17 pm in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2672056
    PLA
    Participant

    Never heard one ariforce officer tell openly that he had lost… It doesn’t show much more then fundmanagers talking about their best results while they have shown bad results for decades… Nothing to flame but it is no evidence.

    March 5, 2004 at 10:25 am in reply to: PAF over Afghanistan [Russian Perspective] #2672392
    PLA
    Participant

    We all know how often IAF mig25 did high speed passes of Pakistani capital… But hey tosoe were
    Indians and Pakistani are not even allowed to practice over swamps just onm the border…

    March 5, 2004 at 10:21 am in reply to: More complaints about F-16I #2672396
    PLA
    Participant

    Whats next: all US inventions are Israeli? Or Israel nukes are extremely safe compared to any other arab? Or that Israeli nazi practices are allowed? Please…

    March 5, 2004 at 10:18 am in reply to: Air Force gives F/A-22 poor marks #2672399
    PLA
    Participant

    Windows? 🙂

    March 4, 2004 at 8:48 pm in reply to: PAF over Afghanistan [Russian Perspective] #2672770
    PLA
    Participant

    O please… just keep it friendly… 🙂

    March 3, 2004 at 3:22 pm in reply to: PAF over Afghanistan [Russian Perspective] #2674238
    PLA
    Participant

    There is an ACIG report on this subject. PAF had some problems in getting the right envelope of the AIM9’s. Then there were some problems with the ground controllers (that resulted in less downed aircrafts). For the rest they performed well. There were a lot of sorties and a lot of kills. The problems was that the Russians did fly low and entered Pakistan fast and for a short period. PAF planes were not allowed to kill if the aircraft would end up in Afghanistan. And besides that the ECM did some good work. But the multilpe attack layers were difficult to handle with just a wingman… Not bad at all.
    Cheers.

    March 3, 2004 at 12:16 pm in reply to: News INAF. #2674512
    PLA
    Participant

    We should stop pointing at the Bison as a bad plane. Partially it is the result of unexperienced pilots. Not that pilot lack abilities but they have to jump very fast to a high performance aircraft and that is the reason for Hawk option. Bison upgraded are potential and we see some upgraded versions of the F model as the PG in Pakistan. It is not a bad plane at all. It is cheap, simple and point defence plane. If you fill it with bad kerosene, refit with bad quality soare parts or let it fly by unexperienced pilots then it is up to yo ubut do not make it look bad…

    March 2, 2004 at 10:43 pm in reply to: M2k-Mig-29-F-16 #2674917
    PLA
    Participant

    all other options not good enough? F16… We know US deals… Sorry the Pakistnai and Indonesian know it… That should be enough warning if we remember the software delivery for the LCA program. The mig29 is Russian. I don’t think India wants to rely on one delivery. They will go for French-Russian inventory. The french are known and the IAF has some experience end toosl for this bird.

    March 2, 2004 at 10:18 pm in reply to: M2k-Mig-29-F-16 #2674971
    PLA
    Participant

    I would opt for more mki… but looking at the options the m2k is favourable

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1,381 through 1,395 (of 1,747 total)
1 2 3 … 92 93 94 … 115 116 117