Maindeck doorsills on 747 classics have minimum heights from 457 to 478 cm.
On DC-10, the nominal doorsill heights are 480 to 465 cm.
On empty A310-300, the heights are 455 to 480 cm.
On 767-200, the minimum sill heights are 406 to 409 cm.
On empty A330-300, the heights are 455 to 577 cm.
On 777-200, the minimum heights are 471 to 528 cm.
On laden A380, the heights are 512 to 514 cm.
The distance from the sill of front cargo door of DC-10 to the sill of main deck door above is 201 cm. From rear cargo door to main deck door above, 198 cm.
See the implications here. About 200 cm floor to floor. The headroom in underbelly is less than this by the thickness of the main deck. 167 cm on DC-10. Not enough for a stand-up cabin.
On A310, the front maindeck door is 193 cm above belly door, and rear maindeck door is 210 cm above belly door. So, similar range. Headroom is for 163 cm pallets and containers – not standing humans.
On B767, the front maindeck door is 183 cm above belly door, and rear maindeck door is 180 cm above.
On A330 (jacked), the front maindeck doors are 218 cm above belly door, and rear maindeck doors are 219 to 229 cm above belly door. The front underbelly is 171 cm high, rear underbelly 167 cm.
On 777-200, the front maindeck doors are 190 to 207 cm above underbelly door, and the rear doors are 192 to 206 cm above.
On a jacked A380, maindeck doors are 203 cm above belly doors.
As for the belly door sills…
For classic 747, the height is 264 to 325 cm for front door and 269 to 315 cm for rear door.
On DC-10, the height is around 277 cm for front door, around 267 cm for rear door.
On empty A310-300, the heights are 262 cm for front door, 270 cm for rear door.
On 767-200, the heights are 226 cm for both doors.
On A330-300, the heights are 255 and 322 cm respectively.
On 777-200, the heights are 281 and 322 cm respectively.
On A380, the heights are 310 and 311 cm respectively.
DC-10 lower deck sills are about 42 and 52 cm above fuselage bottom. Hard to figure out exactly.
For A310, the distances are 68 and 76 cm.
For B767-200, both are about 53 cm above bottom
On A330, thanks to the measurements of jacked plane, the data can be exact. The front door is 46 cm above belly, rear door 56 cm above belly.
On 777-200, the front door is about 62 cm above belly, rear door about 103 cm above belly.
On A380 (jacked), front door is 71 cm above front belly and rear door is 85 cm above rear belly.
Remember in commercial aviation “best” is determined not by a pilot or even passengers…and certainly not spotters who like the looks of one plane over another.
Rather “best” is determined by the person who does the math and sees if the company is making a profit.
In which case it is easy to check how many of each were bought.
But what are the impressions of passengers and pilots? (I think both BAC 1-11 and DC-9 were as a design constraint light enough to fly without a flight engineer)
Believe me their Russian equivalent was far far more bizarre.
You mean, Tu-134? Well, it differed from the four by having 4-abreast cross-section. Which makes it more an equivalent of CRJ…
Was this intended for Commercial?
Considered it – but had serious doubts whether Caravelle is commercial, or historic. When did aviation history end?
Interesting, thanks!
http://www.content.airbusworld.com/SITES/Technical_Data/docs/AC/DATA_CONSULT/AC_A380.pdf
Page 20:
176 cubic metres cargo volume
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/airports/acaps/7474sec2.pdf
page 3:
157 cubic metres in containers, 24 cubic metres bulk, total 181 cubic metres.
It would be one heck of a CJ though! Even with x amount of cars and luggage, I’m not sure you’d be able to totally fill the belly, in which case some of that space could be used also.
Actually, the belly of an A380 has less space than the belly of a 747 non-SP. Really. The same height, allowing 163 cm high container – luxury sedans can get in, ATV-s and SUV-s cannot – slightly wider and shorter.
Thus, the real difference berween a 747BBJ and A380ACJ is the upper deck of A380.
From Wiki
Ah. So MTOW under 4500 kg is the defining feature?
And Cessna Citations designed for solo pilots are not “Very” Light Jets simply because they have MTOW-s around 4700…4800 kg?
This website will answer all your questions:
For example:
http://www.auf.asn.au/groundschool/umodule4.html#aerofoils
Look at the section 4.8, the lift-drag ratio diagram.
It is obviously absurd, isn´ t it?
Look at the baseline. By the divisions marked, you can see that the baseline means L/D ratio of 0. Not 2, not 1, not 0,5, not 0,1. Exactly 0.
And the baseline is reached at AoA about 17 degrees.
How is it possible?
No, not quite. There is some difference between spinning and parachuting!
If the airplane is spinning, the wingtips have a substantial horizontal speed, and therefore their AoA is different from 90 degrees.
But an airplane might also parachute vertically down, without spinning.
In neither case is the plane in “free fall” – the air would resist the wings, and keep the rate of descent modest.
As for people who really do not care about consequences, pilots have handy weapons for suicide available when at work – the controls. There are at least three cases which are seriously suspected – one with Royal Air Maroc, one with Silkair, one with Egyptair.
At least, a person walking in front of a train is not particularly likely to derail it and, since they usually collide with the lower part of the locomotive, would not penetrate the windshield to injure the driver.
As for clearing up the aftermath, remember that a person leaves human remains in most cases, and someone has to deal with the remains. This is exactly as applicable to people who die of illness. (Of course, a few suicides successfully make their remains impossible to find or recover).
As for people who really do not care about consequences, pilots have handy weapons for suicide available when at work – the controls. There are at least three cases which are seriously suspected – one with Royal Air Maroc, one with Silkair, one with Egyptair.
At least, a person walking in front of a train is not particularly likely to derail it and, since they usually collide with the lower part of the locomotive, would not penetrate the windshield to injure the driver.
As for clearing up the aftermath, remember that a person leaves human remains in most cases, and someone has to deal with the remains. This is exactly as applicable to people who die of illness. (Of course, a few suicides successfully make their remains impossible to find or recover).
My only suggestion would be if people do get to that point where they cannor go on, then at least do it in a private way to minimise the trauma for others. Having friends who are train drivers and having seen the affects on them of a suicide on the rails it is a ghastly thing to inflict on another person to step in front of a train or bus. Plus there is the expense of the clean up, delays to travellers etc.
Moving train or bus could be described as relatively quick and certain way to get crushed to an extent there is no way someone could put it back together. Whereas, as pointed out, an overdose of available drugs often would not be lethal at all, and if it would be then death may take a long time, during which inconsiderate people may discover the suicide and intervene in various medical ways.
My only suggestion would be if people do get to that point where they cannor go on, then at least do it in a private way to minimise the trauma for others. Having friends who are train drivers and having seen the affects on them of a suicide on the rails it is a ghastly thing to inflict on another person to step in front of a train or bus. Plus there is the expense of the clean up, delays to travellers etc.
Moving train or bus could be described as relatively quick and certain way to get crushed to an extent there is no way someone could put it back together. Whereas, as pointed out, an overdose of available drugs often would not be lethal at all, and if it would be then death may take a long time, during which inconsiderate people may discover the suicide and intervene in various medical ways.
Yes, the Bombardier website states the 31. I 2006 date, but there have been news of design changes since.