dark light

Reckless Rat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 102 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wright Bros 110th Anniversary #943456
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Not when I went to school, it wasn’t!

    Oh, and – happy birthday, Propstrike 😎

    in reply to: RAF Fighter Command Radio Call Signs – 1940 #986587
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Hi Andy,

    I am also interested in a definitive list, if such a thing exists!

    For 263 Squadron, the ORB notes on 01 Nov 40, “R.T. Call Sign changed to “Cosy”. Green and Red sections at readiness.” That’s as close as I can get.

    I have a few other bits and bobs about callsigns for them, but it is much later (’42 onwards)

    Hope this helps,

    Jeff

    in reply to: Bristol Freighter hotel.. #993501
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Barry, a.k.a. ‘Billy Black’ is what you’d call a bit of a character. I remember he had a dancing pig as part of a stage show that he named Don Rash after the then-Leader of the Opposition!

    The railway carriages have been there for years, but I don’t think I remember the Bristol (it’s been more than 10 years). A bit further south there was the DC3 which had been turned into a cafe, too. I always wanted to stop there as a kid, but we never did. Maybe next time I’m home?

    http://www.mangaweka.co.nz/dc3-aeroplane.html

    in reply to: General Discussion #265547
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    So, in a former life, I guess my wife was a cat.:highly_amused:

    I suspect that trying to confirm this with a saucer of milk and a piece of string would be highly inadvisable!

    Back on avian topics – I’m very pleased to hear that these chaps are gradually returning to city areas back home.

    Something I miss – along with walking through the bush with a couple of these chaps acting as ‘wingmen’.

    And finally – one of the conservation projects my parents are working on involves reintroducing these chaps to pest-free habitats.

    in reply to: Who likes birds ? #1866263
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    So, in a former life, I guess my wife was a cat.:highly_amused:

    I suspect that trying to confirm this with a saucer of milk and a piece of string would be highly inadvisable!

    Back on avian topics – I’m very pleased to hear that these chaps are gradually returning to city areas back home.

    Something I miss – along with walking through the bush with a couple of these chaps acting as ‘wingmen’.

    And finally – one of the conservation projects my parents are working on involves reintroducing these chaps to pest-free habitats.

    in reply to: General Discussion #265799
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    the conclusion was that cats are not the main or even a major reason for the decline in small bird populations

    Certainly downunder, one of the main predators of forest birds is actually rats. Another huge problem in NZ is possums, which not only kill the trees but also destroy nests and kill and eat chicks and eggs. There is a pretty extensive programme of laying/dropping 1080 (sodium fluoroacetate) because it is the most efficient way of controlling them in inaccessible areas. The situation is more complicated in Aus because there’s more mammals about – hence Jim’s friend’s resistance.

    There always seems to be a lot of angst when Tiddles comes in with something twitching these days. They’re cats. It’s what they do. Much like meat comes from supermarkets, people have forgotten that cats are apex predators and that was the whole point of domesticating them in the first place. If anything, while your average domestic mog* will catch something now and then I suspect that most of them don’t really try too hard – like Paul’s cat. The thing is, people tend to remember when they do, and c. 10m cats in the UK means a lot of corpses.

    *There are, of course, the exceptions – of which our little cat was one. He was 4 months old when we got him but he’d clearly had a pretty tough start to life. We couldn’t have wished for a more gentle, well-behaved, and affectionate pet – but I have never seen a cat quite so utterly attuned to hunting as him. Everything was about hunting. The first time we let him outside, he spent 20 minutes trying to ‘catch’ the grass. Why? Because when he stepped on it, it moved! His crowning achievement was a fully-grown pigeon which was nearly bigger than he was.
    I miss my little friend.

    in reply to: Who likes birds ? #1866444
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    the conclusion was that cats are not the main or even a major reason for the decline in small bird populations

    Certainly downunder, one of the main predators of forest birds is actually rats. Another huge problem in NZ is possums, which not only kill the trees but also destroy nests and kill and eat chicks and eggs. There is a pretty extensive programme of laying/dropping 1080 (sodium fluoroacetate) because it is the most efficient way of controlling them in inaccessible areas. The situation is more complicated in Aus because there’s more mammals about – hence Jim’s friend’s resistance.

    There always seems to be a lot of angst when Tiddles comes in with something twitching these days. They’re cats. It’s what they do. Much like meat comes from supermarkets, people have forgotten that cats are apex predators and that was the whole point of domesticating them in the first place. If anything, while your average domestic mog* will catch something now and then I suspect that most of them don’t really try too hard – like Paul’s cat. The thing is, people tend to remember when they do, and c. 10m cats in the UK means a lot of corpses.

    *There are, of course, the exceptions – of which our little cat was one. He was 4 months old when we got him but he’d clearly had a pretty tough start to life. We couldn’t have wished for a more gentle, well-behaved, and affectionate pet – but I have never seen a cat quite so utterly attuned to hunting as him. Everything was about hunting. The first time we let him outside, he spent 20 minutes trying to ‘catch’ the grass. Why? Because when he stepped on it, it moved! His crowning achievement was a fully-grown pigeon which was nearly bigger than he was.
    I miss my little friend.

    in reply to: Miniture Napier Sabre engine WOW! #940967
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Lovely work! A few years ago I heard of a similar project, creating a 1/3 scale Napier Dagger, which is further along.

    http://modelengineeringwebsite.com/Napier_aero_engine.html

    http://modelengineeringwebsite.com/Dagger_update_2.html

    “There are no castings and all parts are hand machined from solid alloy blocks”

    Jaw-dropping.

    in reply to: Fighter Squadron ORBs #951059
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    £3.36?! for 338 pages?! A steal!

    My experience is pretty much limited to 263 Sqn, but the appendices were mostly combat reports or summaries of operations in a variety of formats. Most were typed or carbon copies of telex messages, but some were hand-written or contained diagrams of targets and lines of attack. Length varies from a couple of lines through to 3-4 pages.

    There were also some sundries; movement orders, nominal rolls of pilots, occasionally write-ups of training or ‘unusual’ duties.

    HTH,

    Jeff

    in reply to: Is this the reason for the loss of a Whirlwind? #951862
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    HMSV – that rules that idea out, then! ‘Scuse ignorance, but sometimes stupid questions are worth asking.

    CD – I seem to remember that it was done once or twice later on – F/Sgt Len Gray being one, over in France. Curiously, they did have a good reputation for survivability in pretty serious crashes.

    in reply to: Is this the reason for the loss of a Whirlwind? #952176
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    I’ve always wondered why he didn’t try for a belly landing, considering the perceived value of the brand-new, ‘top-secret’ fighter. Easy to say and difficult to do, no doubt, but presumably they decided not to risk it with the high approach and landing speed?

    Matt – are the stud bolt spacings the same on the Hurricane and Whirlwind hubs?

    in reply to: What are Luftwaffe 'Theatre Bands' for? #958759
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Sometimes, even both sides visually identifying the other wasn’t enough

    http://www.halcyon-class.co.uk/FriendlyFire/friendly_fire.htm

    When the lookout shouted, “Aircraft on the port side”, everybody got up, but we couldn’t see anything because the sun was shining straight in our eyes. Then the lookout called, “They’re friendly aircraft”.

    Owing to doubt as to identity, controller was asked 4 times whether to attack and was told that the ships fired coloured lights, Controller said no friendly ships in area and ordered attack.

    2 sunk, 86 dead, 124 wounded.

    in reply to: General Discussion #271152
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Some very handsome little chaps, indeed! Mine used to actually grab the flaps of his box and haul it around the living room for prime positioning. Second-best toy ever (after these things )

    in reply to: Cat and box. #1871711
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Some very handsome little chaps, indeed! Mine used to actually grab the flaps of his box and haul it around the living room for prime positioning. Second-best toy ever (after these things )

    in reply to: The Shuttleworth Sopwith Camel #965211
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Ah, of course. Thanks, AA.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 102 total)