dark light

Reckless Rat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 102 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Shuttleworth Sopwith Camel #967154
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    I’m not sure, but I think that’s the ‘Dislike’ button there on top of the control column! 😀

    Beautiful work. Seeing it in a state of deshabille really emphasises just how delicate they are/were – and how brave the chaps that flew them were!

    Here’s to seeing it back in its natural element one day.

    in reply to: .303 v 0.50 Browninigs #1002124
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    I’ve heard it said that the wing flex on a turning Spitfire made the Brownings in the outer bays of questionable value anyway – although that may be giving the average pilot’s shooting ability a little too much credit! I guess the trade-off for the M2 is fewer, heavier rounds vs. extended range and hitting power. Again, it comes down to the bloke on the end of the trigger; the longer effective range might encourage the average Joe not to get in close, thus accuracy plummets. In bomber turrets, however, the further away you keep the enemy, the better! Hence it’s a shame how long the Rose turret was delayed. One other attraction of the .303 was that the round was used absolutely everywhere, so no need for specialist supplies (less of an issue on home soil, granted).

    A question which occurred to me, not neccessarily in light of 50-cal v 0.303 – what was the barrel life on these weapons? Presumably not very long if they were getting 300 rounds or more through them on a regular basis? My only (very limited) experience was with the C9 Minimi, where IIRC the recommended barrel life seemed distressingly short. On the bright side, it was dead easy to change – apparently not the case on the .303 where you basically need to dismantle the entire weapon. Firing them is all very well, but some poor bloke’s going to have 12 lots of 8x.303’s to service at the end of the day.

    in reply to: General Discussion #284415
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    I have a marking stamp here at school that uses a New Zealandism: ‘Your fellas’ work is choice.’

    Chur bro, that’s ace, eh? 😎

    My company is divided on geographical lines – head office several counties away is a very different beast to my building full of engineers. Hence a fair bit of snickering when emails come around talking about ‘key messages’, ‘looking for synergies’, ‘drivers’, ‘key stakeholders’ and other buzzwords. ‘It’s about empowerment’ was a good one a few days ago, met with cries of “Someone’s been on a course!”. We started a “BS Word of the Day” competition on the board in the canteen a few weeks ago, and some cracking entries there were, too! Among the usual suspects were Blamestorming*, Seagull Management**, and (a particular favourite) Testiculating***

    We probably should have wiped it off before the senior management turned up a couple of weeks later. :stupid:

    * Blamestorming – getting together in a group to discuss why a deadline was missed and who will carry the can.
    ** Seagull Management – A manager who flies in, makes an enormous noise, cr*ps on everyone and then leaves them to clean up the mess.
    *** Testiculating – Waving your arms around and talking b*llocks.

    in reply to: Ghastly office jargon….. #1880761
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    I have a marking stamp here at school that uses a New Zealandism: ‘Your fellas’ work is choice.’

    Chur bro, that’s ace, eh? 😎

    My company is divided on geographical lines – head office several counties away is a very different beast to my building full of engineers. Hence a fair bit of snickering when emails come around talking about ‘key messages’, ‘looking for synergies’, ‘drivers’, ‘key stakeholders’ and other buzzwords. ‘It’s about empowerment’ was a good one a few days ago, met with cries of “Someone’s been on a course!”. We started a “BS Word of the Day” competition on the board in the canteen a few weeks ago, and some cracking entries there were, too! Among the usual suspects were Blamestorming*, Seagull Management**, and (a particular favourite) Testiculating***

    We probably should have wiped it off before the senior management turned up a couple of weeks later. :stupid:

    * Blamestorming – getting together in a group to discuss why a deadline was missed and who will carry the can.
    ** Seagull Management – A manager who flies in, makes an enormous noise, cr*ps on everyone and then leaves them to clean up the mess.
    *** Testiculating – Waving your arms around and talking b*llocks.

    in reply to: Deutsches Museum, Flugwert Schleissheim #1007495
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    A DB60-something, but once I looked it up none of the pictures looked right. I was pretty sure there was a DB-600 series engine which had been doubled up along the same lines as the RR Vulture and used in an unsuccessful German Heavy bomber design – but I couldn’t think what that was, either. Jumo 210? Nope. Obviously getting senile in my old age 😀

    Thank you for rescuing my junior Senior moment!

    in reply to: Deutsches Museum, Flugwert Schleissheim #1008268
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Thanks Mike – not for the faint of heart, one assumes!

    in reply to: Deutsches Museum, Flugwert Schleissheim #1008359
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Some great pix there – especially the view from on high.

    That ‘Flying Wing’-type glider must have required immense amounts of intestinal fortitude to fly! Landing would be like doing the Cresta run! Do you know what its type or history is?

    ETA: And that whacking great engine? I thought I knew what it was – and I was wrong!

    Cheers,

    Jeff

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #1014921
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Perhaps he was keeping a sharp eye out for Buchons above and behind! :highly_amused:

    in reply to: RAF/RCAF POWs Escapees/Repatriations? #936463
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Hi Darrell,

    The following website has a (partial) list of MI9 reports in WO 208

    http://www.conscript-heroes.com/MI9-01.html

    And there is a Sgt James A Smith listed but I assuming his isn’t your man? Do you have any Squadron or type details, etc.?

    3314 1319 (-)
    Sgt James A Smith
    214 Sqn Stirling BK653
    FTR Mannheim Apr 43 – Oaktree – Pyrenees June 43

    He seems to have made it with some of his crew – F/Sgt David E James RCAF, Sgt W G Grove, Sgt James Hall, Sgt R W Adams.

    Regards,

    Jeff

    in reply to: Fish tank disaster!! #941229
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Ouch – I really hope as many as possible can be salvaged.

    I have to ask; was the tank resting directly on the shelf? I was always told to have a sheet of polystyrene underneath so that there was a little ‘give’ to even out any stresses. Otherwise, with all that weight on top of it, all it takes is one grain of sand…

    Good luck.

    in reply to: Air Historical Branch #949840
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Thanks Andy, good to know I haven’t completely lost the plot.

    I shall keep a weather eye on TNA’s website for more.

    Jeff

    in reply to: Air Historical Branch #949965
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Seeing this thread, it twanged a distant neuron that I had seen a post either here or elsewhere about a year ago that the AHB were running a consultation with various groups over the release of accident cards/reports to TNA. This was backed up by a press release or other official notification. Of course, now that I come to look for it I can’t find anything.

    Does this ring any bells, or have I simply gone completely crackers? It would certainly be a step forward for researchers – assuming all the DPA requirements can be met.

    Yours,

    Doolally of Tunbridge Wells

    in reply to: RRHT Derby #960046
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Does anyone know whether they hold any data on run-of-the-mill workers from WW2? I know that my grandmother worked there for a period c. 1940-42 before joining the WAAF, but that’s as much as anyone in the family knows.

    Cheers,

    Jeff

    in reply to: Spitfires – Dunkirk #980419
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Al Deere, wasn’t it?

    On 23 May 1940, during the closing phases of the Battle of France, Deere and Pilot Officer J. Allen flew Spitfires escorting Flight Lieutenant James Leathart across the channel in a Miles Magister to rescue 74 Squadron’s commanding officer, who had made a forced landing. In sight of Leathart and White, Deere claimed his first combat victories, shooting down two Bf 109s. Later the same day he shot down a third Bf 109.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Deere

    Regards,
    Jeff

    in reply to: Any aerofoil experts out there? #995000
    Reckless Rat
    Participant

    Hi Matt,

    I did wonder whether – being from the wind tunnel model – it might have been an experimental section to investigate the compressibility problems around the tail which resulted in the acorn, but I think that’s also too early?

    Incidentally, I notice that Bingham has “…thin section wing of NACA 23017-08 section…” (pg 21) which is presumably the mainplane outboard of the nacelles. I’m sure you already have that, but I thought I’d mention it anyway in case it leads you in any particular direction!

    Cheers,

    Jeff

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 102 total)