IAF’s ACM says that he hopes that the L1 bidder will be identified in 2 weeks time..
India may choose winner of MRCA in 2 weeks
NEW DELHI: India may announce the lowest bidder for a contract worth about $10 billion to buy fighter jets for the country’s airforce in the next two weeks, N A K Browne, chief of the Indian Air Force said.
….“I am hopeful that in another two weeks’ time we will be able to shortlist the name,” Browne told Reuters on the sidelines of an event.
If they didn’t, then there was no point to even discussing a purchase, since the weapons couldn’t be sold by the UK, & the radar wasn’t for sale. Hence my comments.
And the aircraft were perfectly good without the radar & missiles, since they could have been slotted into the already running EL/M-2032/Derby programme, which would have given the IN a standardised fleet. The only argument against this would be if adapting the EL/M-2-32 upgrade for FA2 would have been prohibitively expensive – and that was never raised as a reason for rejecting the aircraft.
That the radar was not for sale wasn’t obvious at the beginning, otherwise there wouldn’t have been any such evaluations at all. Negotiations failed and the UK didn’t budge on not selling the Blue Vixen (which is ridiculous considering what they were willing to offer with the Typhoon :rolleyes:). Besides which, who knows what the other issues were there which scuttled those negotiations. We’ve never seen an IN report on what the actual outcome of the evaluations were or what they thought those FA2s were worth without radar and weapons. You make it seem like the MoD is populated by bumbling idiots who don’t know what they’re doing at all.
The MoD believed at that time that the INS Vikramaditya would arrive much earlier than it will and the 16 MiG-29Ks would offer the IN a far superior air complement than some modified SHar FA2s.
And anyway, the IN is (as I’ve said before) doing just fine without those FA2s. It’s not like the entire SHar fleet of the IN is out of commission or anything like that. The small numbers we have are sufficient for the small embarked fleet that the INS Viraat can carry.
Second ATV INS Aridaman (also translates to Destroyer of Enemies) to be launched by year end or first quarter of 2013.
At a time when diminishing operational availability of its conventional submarine fleet has put the Navy in dire straits, it has some reason to cheer.
Informed sources told The Hindu that the construction of a second Arihant-class nuclear submarine, to be named INS Aridaman, is moving fast at the Shipbuilding Centre (SBC) in Visakhapatnam. It is slated for launch by this year-end or in the first quarter of next year.“The boat, under outfitting now, is headed for a year-end launch. Meanwhile, hull fabrication is on for the third Arihant-class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine,” the sources said. “Unlike surface vessels, submarines are fully outfitted before launch, which makes it a prerequisite for its weapons to be tested and ready well in advance.”
The first submarine of the class, INS Arihant, launched in July 2009, has just completed its harbour acceptance trials and is set to undergo the crucial sea acceptance trials in February.
“This will be followed by weapon trials before the submarine is formally inducted into the Navy, hopefully in 2013, when the country will attain the much-desired nuclear triad,” the sources said. Concurrently, nuclear-powered submarine INS Chakra, borrowed on a 10-year lease from Russia mainly for training purposes, will be inducted in the latter half of 2012.
Troubled by the eroding strength of its conventional underwater arm, the Navy’s ‘blue water’ aspirations remained in the realm of wishful thinking, with the force failing to add even a single submarine to its inventory in the last decade.
With the Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV) programme to indigenously design and build nuclear-powered attack submarines gaining momentum after years of indecision and disorientation in the 1990s, the goal, claimed the sources, was within reach now.
Chief of the Naval Staff Admiral Nirmal Verma said last year that once commissioned, INS Arihant would be deployed on ‘deterrent (combat) patrol.’
Although it would be home-ported in Visakhapatnam, the submarine, armed with nuclear-tipped K-15 or B-5 ballistic missiles and having a range of about 750 km, would offer effective deterrence against Pakistan, the sources pointed out.
The missiles are developed under the Sagarika programme.
Displacing about 6,000 tonnes, the 112 metre-long Arihant-class of boomer submarines are powered by indigenously-built 80-MW nuclear power plants. Each submarine is said to store 12 K-15 missiles besides torpedoes and torpedo-launched cruise missiles.
Brahmos fired from INS Ranvir

I thought Zelin referred to it as Mi-35M.
http://russianplanes.net/ID62934
Algerian Yak-130.
Looks nice in that camo..a welcome change from the grays we see so often now.
You don’t make an official approach the UK, spend months evaluating the aircraft & the British offer, & then make an announcement of the results of the evaluation & the reasons for not buying, if you’re not serious. If you don’t want them, you just say so.
Unless, of course, the evaluation was just a corrupt freebie for some officers & bureaucrats.
They didn’t want it without the radar and weapons. Get over it will you. The IN is doing fine without those Sea Harrier FA2..its not the IN after all that doesn’t have a fast jet component anymore. Talk about logic and all that stuff..:rolleyes:
Some more pics





FA-50? I thought the KAI T-50 was being offered to Israel? Is this a mistake or are the Koreans offering the Israelis the fighter/attack variant of the T-50 rather than just the trainer now?
As per some Israeli sources, that sale is actually to India, not South Korea.
ray, there is only one such pic AFAIK. static, not flying. people on BR had the same question and someone found this image a few months back.
yes indeed Boom, there is a pic of a static Tejas with a drop tank on the centerline pylon. As per this weapons specifications page on Tejas.gov.in, the centerline hard point is indeed wet and can also carry bombs along it (1000 lbs).
So why has the NLCA not flown yet, was rolled out a while ago ?
As per PS Subramanyam, head of ADA
On LCA Tejas Navy:
The naval aircraft is undergoing the ground testing towards the low speed/
high speed taxi trials. After completing these trials, the aircraft gets cleared for the flight. The new feature of this aircraft which are not on the IAF variant like strengthened under carriage, leading edge, Vortex control devices etc. demand additional testing facility for the safety aspects.
Also this being the first aircraft of the naval variant, the rigor with which is testing is conducted is higher than that of the normal production. Any observation during the testing related to the safety has been of utmost importance so that the aircraft is safe to fly. It is proposed that the aircraft will fly this month after going through all formal clearance process.
This was given in an interview in the Aeromag’s December issue. Something probably happened or some issue was noticed during LSTT/HSTT that has led to a delay in its first flight.
thanks for the wonderful photos. What a beautiful little bird.
You’re welcome bgnewf. You’ll notice in the pic posted by rayrubik that the Tejas is no bigger than a Sea Harrier !
more pics of the Tejas from the weapons trials held in Goa..




carrying Israeli Griffin LGBs..




courtesy Livefist blog.
IAF MiG-29UPG Srl # KBU 3123 with a Kh-35E (AS-20 Kayak) anti-ship missile

larger image from the article that Boom posted..possibly IAC-1?

Don’t worry, if the Rafale doesn’t win, the Rafale crew here will promptly declare it had nothing to do with performance.
And that would be right. At this stage there is no No.1 or No.2 as far as the IAF is concerned, based on performance. The cost, offsets and ToT will decide who is the winner.