Can’t wait to vote No in 2 days time! BW Roger
Do you remember Stephan Piercey, one of the best photographers I have known? 20 years ago, after he died in a crash in Germany, his legacy was auctioned or better said, his slides were sold to everybody interested. Now his propliner slides collection can be found all over the world, a few here, a few there. It should have been better if the Piercey collection should have been kept intact, as one piece. As a fact, it didn’t, and every now and then his pics turn up in the mags, sometimes credited with its name, but most of the time, some looser puts his own name under the pic, which I see as an insult to say at least. Collections should be kept as a collection. BW Roger
A good friend of mine passed away a short while back and his personal collection of aircraft and airshow photographs dating back to the early sixties was offered free of charge to a well know archive but was declined.
Septic.[/QUOTE]
With me the situation is different. The museum (the big one overhere) was/is realy happy to receive my photographic collection ( and 2 other collections I have) when I am gone. To be honest, it was their own idea. So, I know it is safe. I know severall collections of 10.000nds of pics and negatives, some starting as early as in the 1930ties, which were dumped by the family or who ever took charge, and ended into large carbage containers, even before the person who took them, were burried. Sometimes things go very fast. I know that the entire private collection of aviation related items of a former director of an aviation museum were dumped right after his death. The family had no idea that it might be of interest for the museum he worked so long for. So, in my opinion, this is much more a danger than the fact that RAWs will be difficult to read in times to be.
BW Roger
And another “kit” in Barcelona ( under 30 years of dust ). BW roger
While trying to shoot some stored Caribous in Madrid, I fell into a concrete (with iron bars) ditch. Didn’t hurt at all so I thought things were fine, untill I looked down and noticed I cut some (rather high pressure) veins in my leg. Costed me 10 weeks and the entire 2004 season to cure. BW Roger
Here is some new info. The machine suffered an engine malfunction, and had to land. it landed in a field, which was fine, but the field was to small, so it ploughed through a water filled ditch/canal ( we call it sloot ). Its entire undercart and a wing were torned from the machine which then came through a halt. BW Roger
Welll, a nice crash pic is always welcome for the saturday edition, so I realy don’t know why this one wasn’t covered. Checked the luchtvaartpolitie , luchtvaartinspectie and former RLD, but nothing. Even Omroep Zeeland had nothing in the archive (of ik heb verkeerd gezocht) Gr Roger
Just find out, the crash was last Friday (May 20) and the machine came down near Kats in the south west of Holland. That’s all, I am looking for a pic. BW Roger
Can´t find anything on it on the Dutch news, which is strange. Any info on where in Holland it went down. BW Roger
Looks like it is just another variation on the “digital sucks” posts posted before.If you believe in film, fine with me. in a few years most film will be gone anyway, and it will be a digital world of photography only.Shot slides for 30 years, but I haven’t touched my almost new Eos 1vs for almost 3 years now.I only shoot RAW and if they can’t be read in 20 years isn’t my problem to be honest, by that time I’ll be long gone. My archive of almost 130.000 slides, 50.000 black and whites and god knows how many digital files (by then), will all be given to a national aviation museum, as is already registrated in my last will. So my archive is as safe as possible. Think this is a much more historical responsible act than scaring people that their RAWs can’t be read in a few years/decades time. Who cares as most of what people shoot today is going to the carbage compound in the long run, wether it be on film or digital base. BW Roger
Erich Hartman
BW Roger
I counted 13 different ones on Sunday. Left however at 14.30 so maybe there were more. Here are some pics I shot then.BW Roger
And it is spacious (the cockpit), or better said enormous for a Ww2 bomber. You can stand inside with severall persons and it still isnt “narrow”. BW Roger
Hi James,
A Canon 15mm F2.8 on a Canon EOS 1D
BW Roger
Around the first 4 to 5 meters of the fuselage ,BW Roger