Logistically it would be a huge operation. BA already dominates T1 and T4 (the largest terminals) and T2 isn’t really geared to serving large numbers of widebodies. Given that T5 will be for all BA flights anyway, I don’t see the point in doing so for such a short space of time. Better to reorganise once BA relocates to T5 in my opinion.
Now can somebody tell me do Glopespan fly into Dublin and if not why are their planes always here.
No, they don’t fly to DUB. The only Irish route they fly is BFS-PMI.
I saw an old episode of Airport recently in which a passenger was accused of tampering with his passport. It appeared as though the photograph had been replaced (on the older style ones where the photograph is on the revese of the back cover), as the back cover has creases around the photograph. Anyhow, it resulted in the poor guy being interrogated and missing his flight. In the end, the immigration officials found that the passport was genuine.
Every time I fly this worries me, as my passport (now almost 10 years old and due for renewal soon) is in a similar condition.
Interesting. I remember QF doing a similar thing immediately after terminating their own service to MAN in the 1990s, only they used a BA 732 on that occasion. I suppose the main advantage would be allowing passengers to connect at the same terminal at LHR?
Assume SIA = Swiss. The article isn’t very clear.
Are Qantas going to fly LHR-MAN with Bae146 using their extra slot until they start the new services.I belive I read that in a Airliner World magazine recently.
Thought they already had a codeshare agreement on BA MAN-LHR flights.
I belive Frontier as a LCC were having a big problem with the A318 because the front cargo door was so close to the engine the were finding it hard to maneuvre around it anybody else know anything.
Not heard this – what I’d heard is that the 320 series needs cargo to be lifted onto the aircraft, whereas the 737NG doesn’t – it’s cargo door is lower. I think this comment came from either FR or EZY (if it was the latter, it’s a bit ironic).
very nice 🙂
Hmmm… I’m tempted to respond to [email]mail@dontflybmi.com[/email] telling them how great my flight with bmi was 🙂 purely to wind them up. As Frank says, half the links don’t work anyway so it’s ironic this guy is being so pedantic.
Good to see them making a comeback – I like the new livery too!
Nice picture 🙂
Heres my theory.Every plane cost a fixed amount to operate per km and every aircraft carriers a maximum amount of passenger.When you divide costs by passengers the answer you get for the 717 is quite a bit higher than it competitors such as the NG737 and A320.Interestingly when I do some more calculations the cheapest aircraft to operate in that group in the 737-800 so obviously Ryanair made the right decision.The A319 seems to be a no no as its quite expensive to operate but Easyjet stuff alot of passengers in there so they obviously make it up there.
I think this is true. The 737NGs also have faster turnaround times to the A319 (the baggage compartment door is better placed apparently) which is crucial in a loco operation. I think there are a few reasons why the 717 hasn’t sold very well:
* it’s basically an MD aircraft, which Boeing haven’t promoted because it competes to some degree with the 736;
* MD aircraft don’t have rear passenger doors hence slower turnaround times – a disadvantage for locos;
* it’s not part of a family (except perhaps (?) the MD90) therefore there is no commonality with other aircraft and parts;
* it was probably launched too late, as former MD customers were starting to re-equip with Airbus and other Boeing models.
Just my own opinions.
BY it’s a really good and well written report. I just like to know what to expect when I fly on a particular airline (i.e. other people’s experiences and opinions), and this report does exactly that.