It won’t last. – Nermal

His teddy doesn’t understand him. – Nermal

Ha ha:rolleyes: – from the laughing:confused: – Nermal

Originally posted by Geforce
And really get rid of those rediculous signatures. More people are doing it now. Don’t they realise that…they make A COMPLETE FOOL of themselves because it’s…very irritating for forum-users.

No signatures at all, no websites, no commercial profits.

Actually a very good demonstration of don’t do as I do, do as I say…? – Nermal

I fancy a rib! – Nermal

And share the fire water!:D – Nermal

Re: Flood.

Originally posted by A380!!
Why do you have so MANY posts and your presence on this forum is DOMINANT!. Do you live adjacent to a keyboard?

I think you should lighten up on the posting and get out into the world

No offence intended.

So is this jealousy on your part because he is here so much, because he has so many posts, or because he appears to dominate?
Why should he lighten up on the posting when most of his posts here are in a similar vein to yours, and sometimes, just sometimes, are vaguely amusing (sorry people – didn’t mean to encourage him!)?
But I think you do have a bee in your bonnet about him – remember the ‘Worst Thread-jacker’ thread? Your answer was Flood. Or your reply in the ‘I Spy’ thread: take your lazy butt off the computer and get out more! – and although there were several other replies between his question and your retort, the intention was plain…
I know what he does for a living – several here do too – and if you had a look around you would find that he has been out to the SWWAPS at Lasham, the RAF Museum at Hendon, the Brooklands collection, and the AAC Museum at Middle Wallop – with pictures displayed on the historic forum; where have you been?
No offence. – Nermal

Originally posted by Multirole
Sure it does happen, male babies are left to die too. Show me a country where this doesnot occur. Poor countries with large populations simply have larger instances of this. Some families are so poor they can’t support even one child, the sex is irrelevant except boys are more likely to be adopted and less likely abandoned.

No – a colleague of mine recently photographed a couple of religious-maniac nutters who were going out to China to try and find homes elsewhere in the world for the abandoned baby [b]GIRLS[/b]. Chinese families want boys – the old thinking was that a girl would marry and look after her husbands parents when they became frail and elderly, so with the one child doctrine the couple who had a girl-child would be alone with little help in their old age. Obviously if they could afford to pay a two child tax then they could afford to look after themselves into their old age too, but the people who can’t will be desperate for a baby boy – and the pictures from within China that my colleague had to copy showed the conditions that the discarded girl babies had to live and die in were much worse than in those infamous Romanian orphanages.
Sorry Multirole – if you were from Rwanda, Iraq, Pinochet-era Chile, or Stalinist era Russia, etc, would you be defending their history of crowd control too? – Nermal