Latest update from the VTTS website:
“2009 Pledge Campaign Update
15 July 2009 – Robert Pleming
2009 Pledge Campaign Update – 15th July 2009
Figures to date indicate that we so far have had a 75% return from honoured Pledges. Included in this, 60% of the donations have valuable gift aid added on to their donation.
Given we were expecting an 80% return, we are now close to achieving our initial target, but we do need to reach it. We would of course welcome any additional funding to help us pass that target, which equates to roughly £50,000.
Should you now be in a position to honour a previous pledge, or even add to an existing one, we would be really grateful for any funding you can provide.
Simply complete the letters you have already, consider using the e-donate system off our main Home Page or ring the office on 0116 247 8145.
Once again, many thanks to all our supporters in helping to keep this project alive through the 2009 Pledge Campaign.
Robert Pleming”
Creaking Door. Bristol Hercules is the name my guide suggested, but with a question mark in his voice??
It is definitely 100% certain a Bristol Hercules engine.
Yes, it is a very similar hub also from a Hercules engine; possibly even the same aircraft. Notice the four brass rings between the hub and reduction gear? These are for brushes for the electrically controlled variable-pitch propeller; on the front view you can see four electrical contacts (2+1+1) on the front face of the hub (between the six studs).
I’d be very interested to know what type of aircraft this propeller was fitted to also as I have an identical one in my garage.
It is definitely a Bristol Hercules engine with Rotol propeller, as to what is from…
…possibly Wellington or Lancaster II.
100% Bristol Hercules! 🙂
Thanks, C.D, in my haste to get the response away, I omitted the vital bit!
Thanks for the five minute puzzle…..it was fun! 🙂
NX636? Lancaster BVII (FE) RAE Oct48 – Sep 55
I have been looking for some photo’s or books on the rolls royce merlin with clear COLOUR photo’s not black/white as there not very good for detail.
You could try taking your own photographs. There are many sectioned instructional engines in museums so I’m sure you could find a Merlin somewhere that would be suitable.
I want a plane in the garden as an ornament…
I’m not sure I see your problem…
…how is an aircraft in your garden going to affect your wife cooking your dinner, washing your clothes or cleaning the house? :diablo:
I want a plane in the garden as an ornament…
I’m not sure I see your problem…
…how is an aircraft in your garden going to affect your wife cooking your dinner, washing your clothes or cleaning the house? :diablo:
A surprisingly large number but as you say most unsuitable for deployment in Afghanistan.
“Mr Codner, director of military studies, Royal United Services Institute, says Britain’s armed forces have 520 ‘frontline’ helicopters.”
Are there really that many?
Latest update from the VTTS website:
“Mixed emotions – and even more mixed weather!
14 July 2009 – Robert Pleming
Our seemingly never ending roller-coaster ride has continued in the last couple of weeks, with not only the Permit to Fly renewal issue to address, but also two annoying technical snags, and the first poor weather this summer to affect our flying programme.
Thankfully, we have had tremendous positive response from the majority of the public and so we now look optimistically forward to the summer holiday season with excitement and hope for clear, calm sunny days.
Display organisers have reported above-capacity crowds, drawn to the sight of our amazing aircraft. We must now capitalise on telling our story, to grow the income streams that will keep XH558 flying into the future.
This is where the new ‘Vulcan Village’ is really important, as the public presence of Vulcan to the Sky at airshows. We have already had many positive comments about the professional appearance this gives our project and will certainly remain the main focus of our ground operations. It is a hugely exciting development in our story.
At this point, I would like to remind everyone of the vital role played in the running of the Vulcan Village by the Vulcan To The Sky Supporters Club.
Not only have the Club part financed it, but the Vulcan Village is being operated throughout the season by dedicated volunteers drawn from the membership. We all owe a great deal of thanks to their unstinting support and hard work on what are very often 15 hour long working days!
I can also announce that the Club have kindly agreed to make a monthly standing order to the Trust of at least £5,000. This will directly cover costs of the two additional engineers the Trust has employed to begin the process of making the Trust self-reliant in terms of engineering support.
In addition, as a result of continuing membership renewals, together with a healthy increase of new members and merchandise sales, I have just received a cheque to the sum of £20,000 as a direct donation from the Club. Richard Clarke, the Club Chairman, tells me that he can foresee this being repeated again shortly, as the membership soars past 8,500.
Both the Club and the Trust believe that expanding the Club Membership is key to securing this project for the future, whilst also promoting our widening range of fundraising and commercial activities.
Please do everything you can to promote XH558 – especially if she is coming to an air show near you! Drop into the Vulcan Village, see the merchandise on offer, find out about the project in more detail or simply enter our £1 Raffle. Every single penny can make the difference to taking XH558 forward to the Airshow circuit next year, her 50th anniversary.
Best Regards,
Robert Pleming”
Creaking Door, it’s supposed to look like that.
So it is; my mistake. 😮
Deafening silence again from the VTTS website!
There were reasons that the Vulcan didn’t display at Yeovilton, reasons that were out of the control of the Vulcan team, so why don’t they post a news update on their website letting everybody know what they were?
Without an ‘official’ statement from the Vulcan team the chances of uniformed speculation, rumour and disappointment turning into criticism, anger and blame are so much greater. Without even an acknowledgement that those that came to support the Vulcan were, once again, disappointed, even if the VTTS trust were not at fault, it just looks like they don’t care!
Many people appreciate the difficulties of operating the Vulcan but I don’t see why communicating with the public is so difficult.
why doesn’t it look right?
The angle the port undercarriage leg was making with the ground.
I appreciate the legs are not supposed to be vertical when fully extended and locked but the angle just looked ‘wrong’…
…maybe it is only the direction the photograph was taken from. (Obviously not criticizing the photograph or photographer here! :D)