dark light

Creaking Door

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 10,501 through 10,515 (of 12,419 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #332883
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    While I think that there probably are cases where torture could be ‘effective’, in the vast majority of cases I think it does more harm than good. Has the intelligence gained through Guantánamo Bay been worth the negative effect of having a centre for torture? Almost certainly not. Would the conviction of a few criminals be worth the damage to the reputation of the Police? No.

    But I do think that, in Britain at least, the criminal justice system has swung far too far in favour of the criminal. It is now just far too difficult, and too expensive, to convict the guilty, and when they are convicted too expensive, it seems, to actually keep them locked up.

    And really that’s what it comes down to in the end – money.

    No, I don’t want to infringe anybody’s human rights but I’d much rather live in a society where the state knew who was in the country, who everybody was, where my DNA was kept on file and where if I was suspected of a crime I could be kept under surveillance, my phone could be tapped, my e-mail opened and under interrogation I could be given a ‘truth serum’ (should such a thing be developed).

    Why? Because I’ve got nothing to hide…

    …and because while I don’t like any of those things I’d be prepared to accept them if it meant that my house was less likely to be burgled, or my car stolen or that I (or my family) would be less likely to get blown-up in a bus, or shot during a robbery, or stabbed for ‘disrespecting’ somebody!

    in reply to: General Discussion #333044
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    I wonder if a genuine ‘truth serum’ is within the reach of modern medical science.

    If it were, would we be happy to see it used in serious criminal cases, or would its use constitute torture?

    in reply to: Serious subject #1908600
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    I wonder if a genuine ‘truth serum’ is within the reach of modern medical science.

    If it were, would we be happy to see it used in serious criminal cases, or would its use constitute torture?

    in reply to: Help identifiy this WWII aircraft part.. #1216588
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Yes, I’m going to stick my neck out and say that it is part of the anti-icing system that channelled air, heated by the exhaust of the DB601/Jumo211 engines, along the leading edge of the wings…

    …but I still can’t figure out which way round it would be fitted. :confused:

    in reply to: Help identifiy this WWII aircraft part.. #1216604
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Tenor Sax !

    Very good. 😀

    The joints between the different bits of it don’t look like they are designed to keep coolant in…..they look more like flexible expansion joints in an exhaust system to me…

    …I just can’t imagine where they would fit the exhaust system of a Jumo 211 engine…..possibly cabin heating or anti-icing systems?

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1217381
    Creaking Door
    Participant
    in reply to: RAF Comets-such a beautiful sight! #1221709
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    The fates of all RAF Comet airframes, from information in United Kingdom Air Arms (Mach III Publishing) and the internet:

    XK655 Comet C2 (RC) G-AMXA – Cockpit – Museum Sharjah UAE
    XK659 Comet C2 (RCM) – Scrapped Elland 2000
    XK663 Comet C2 (RCM) – DBR in hanger fire Watton 1959
    XK669 Comet C2 – Scrapped Brize Norton 1967
    XK670 Comet C2 – Scrapped Lyneham 1968
    XK671 Comet C2 – Scrapped Topcliffe 1979
    XK695 Comet C2 (RC) G-AMXH – Cockpit – Museum London Colney UK
    XK696 Comet C2 – Scrapped Watton 1969
    XK697 Comet C2 – Scrapped Wyton 1987
    XK698 Comet C2 – Scrapped St. Athan 1973
    XK699 Comet C2 G-AMXM – Complete – Gate Guard RAF Lyneham UK
    XK715 Comet C2 – Scrapped Cosford 1972
    XK716 Comet C2 – Scrapped Halton 1973
    XM823 Comet 1XB G-APAS – Complete – Museum Cosford UK
    XM829 Comet 1XB G-AOJU – Scrapped Stanstead 1970
    XN453 Comet 2E – Scrapped Farnborough 1991
    XP915 Comet 3B – Scrapped St. Mawgan 1992
    XR395 Comet C4 G-BDIT – Scrapped Blackbushe 1984
    XR396 Comet C4 G-BDIU – Scrapped Kinloss 1995
    XR397 Comet C4 G-BDIV – Scrapped Lasham 1985
    XR398 Comet C4 G-BDIW – Complete – Museum Hermeskeil Germany
    XR399 Comet C4 G-BDIX – Complete – Museum East Fortune UK
    XS235 Comet 4C G-CPDA – Complete – Taxiable Condition – Bruntingthorpe UK
    XV144 Comet 2E – Scrapped Farnborough 1974
    XV814 Comet 4 – Cockpit – Preserved Chipping Campden UK
    XW626 Comet 4 (AEW mod) G-APDS – Scrapped Bedford 1994
    XX944 Comet 4 – Scrapped Farnborough 1984

    in reply to: Whirlwind Hispano’s rate of fire… #1222301
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    It would be nice to hear what they sounded like.

    This is probably pretty close! 😀

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oc9E8_ZuESQ

    in reply to: Engine make or model anybody? #1222417
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    I’m no doubting you’re correct, but how can you say Packard Merlin from that picture?

    in reply to: Napier Lion Engines – Survivors #1224442
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Lovely. 🙂

    in reply to: Why would you send it by Landing Craft? #1224819
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Yes, exactly my thoughts, the Royal Navy seems to have had a policy of ‘shoot first, ask questions later’ when it came to aircraft identification…..I think I’d go by boat! 😀

    Possibly the intention was to operate this aircraft from the beach at low tide…

    after a strip had been cleared of anti-landing-craft obstacles and mines! 😉

    in reply to: Why would you send it by Landing Craft? #1225222
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Is it one of those launch/recover off a wire things?

    (Edit: No, clearly not!) :confused:

    in reply to: Comet at Lyneham no longer doomed….! #1225225
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    In an ideal world I’d love to save the Lyneham Comet but I don’t think the RAF is badly represented so far:

    XM823 Comet 1XB G-APAS Museum Cosford, Shropshire
    XR398 Comet C4 G-BDIW Museum Hermeskeil, Germany
    XR399 Comet C4 G-BDIX Museum East Fortune, East Lothian, Scotland
    XS235 Comet 4C G-CPDA Preserved Bruntingthorpe, Leicestershire

    Now I call that pretty good by any standards, four genuine RAF airframes in secure locations (one in taxiable condition).

    However, two of these aircraft are stored outside and their long-term future can only be assured by bringing them under cover so rather than try to save another unique but poor condition example wouldn’t the better long-term view be to truly secure those with a better chance?

    in reply to: Comet at Lyneham no longer doomed….! #1225273
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Regards Cosford – it is the RAF museum and ultimately the remit of portraying the RAF should come before preserving test and trials aircraft.

    But the Cosford collection does specialise in displaying RAF test and trials aircraft (and missiles) so Comet XM823 fits the collection perfectly.

    Wouldn’t Le Bourget be interested in the Cosford Comet as its ex Air France, thereby freeing up space for the Lyneham Comet?

    Oh, and b*ll*cks to the French…..they can’t have it! 😀

    in reply to: Comet at Lyneham no longer doomed….! #1225280
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    …there are other appropriate places, though maybe not as relevant.

    The fat lady aint singing yet…..

    (Sorry, deleted my post while trying to edit it.)

    Yes, agreed, but for the long-term future of all the Comets (including the RAF C4 at East Fortune) wouldn’t it be better to try and get all those in museums under cover now than move one more (poor condition example) to a different outdoor storage?

Viewing 15 posts - 10,501 through 10,515 (of 12,419 total)