dark light

Creaking Door

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 10,531 through 10,545 (of 12,419 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Comet at Lyneham no longer doomed….! #1227003
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    An excellent post; exactly what I had intended to post next…..but with the advantage of your undoubted experience. 🙂

    Just to add the production totals (from Wikipedia – Hope they are correct):

    Comet 1 – 12
    Comet 1A – 10
    Comet 2 – 15
    Comet 3 – 1
    Comet 4 – 74

    So really the Comet is quite well represented in the UK, and rightly so for such a historic airframe, but as you say the obvious places to preserve the Lyneham Comet C2 either already have one, don’t want one or don’t have the room for one.

    I was surprised how few Comet 1 airframes were actually built. The notoriety they received following the unfortunate crashes gave me a false impression of their numbers.

    in reply to: Comet at Lyneham no longer doomed….! #1227885
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Would IWM Wroughton be interested?

    Don’t they have a Comet?

    in reply to: Comet at Lyneham no longer doomed….! #1227980
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    The main problem seems to be twofold, money (obviously) and time (or the time to raise the money).

    Maybe some sort of oblique approach is required here; some sort of formalised Historic Aviation Forum Crisis Fund that interested parties could contribute to on a regular basis that would be ready to come into play when an airframe came under threat.

    in reply to: Comet at Lyneham no longer doomed….! #1227998
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Do not underestimate the task of dismantling the aircraft. I would foresee a budget of more than £100K to acquire, move and resite the aircraft dependant on condition.

    Thanks, I was just going to ask what the likely cost of dismantling and moving this Comet would be.

    Put like that, £100,000 certainly brings the scale of the challenge into perspective!

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Donation & MP's Expenses #1909973
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Its a shame how 99% of MP’s are giving all the rest such a bad name.

    😀 😀 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #335690
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Its a shame how 99% of MP’s are giving all the rest such a bad name.

    😀 😀 😀

    in reply to: Canberra Expertise Required – What Is This? #1230878
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Yes, now you’re seeing what I see! 😀

    Notice now the mangled piece of metal at the extreme right of the photo; looks to me as if it has been dragged rearwards by something? Also notice that the perspex of the lights is missing from the extreme right but that slightly further inboard it has survived.

    Do you see what I’m getting at? 🙂

    in reply to: Canberra Expertise Required – What Is This? #1230887
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    …I’ll leave this small mockup I did for my closing argument!

    Yes, but the problem is that you’ve got the wingtip orientated wrong; the arrows that you have drawn are not coincident. The arrow on the wingtip should be drawn along the other edge.

    I agree that the damage could have been caused by a missile…..but what missile…..the Royal Navy didn’t fire any that day?

    in reply to: The dark side of aircraft salvage #1231560
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    There must have been instances where the recovery efforts of aircraft salvers led directly to the discovery and recovery of aircrew listed as MIA; I wonder what the balance of these cases compared to the cases of salvers hindering the search for MIA aircrew is?

    The other thing that occurs to me is that probably very few of us could say that our interest in historic aviation was sparked by a desire to honour the fallen and protect their final resting places?

    It was the aircraft that we liked first.

    As we matured (hopefully) our thoughts turned towards the human sacrifices but the influence of preserved, recovered and restored airframes should not be underestimated. If in 100 years the fallen are to be remembered with the respect that they deserve then the young of today have to experience the same spark of interest that we did, and today there is a lot of competition, Power Rangers, the Clone Wars, Skins, Twitter (whatever that is?)…

    I’m certainly not saying that the fallen shouldn’t be treated with the utmost respect or that the investigation (but not necessarily the recovery) of MIA personnel shouldn’t be given absolute priority but it is a complex (and emotive) issue and there are many sides to it.

    in reply to: Canberra Expertise Required – What Is This? #1231786
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    It might help if creaking door could show us mortals the other side (please):)

    That piece is from a photo taken from an Argentine museum.

    Shouldn’t that have been mentioned at the beginning of the thread!
    Would have saved alot of hassle, and does put the provenance in a different light.

    Sorry, I wish I had a photo of the other side but this photo was lifted from the Zona Militar forum and is the only one I have seen.

    Apologies also for not revealing anything about the origin of the photo or about what aircraft it is supposedly from…

    …my reason being that I hoped to definitely identify it as Canberra, and then port / starboard wingtip before the story behind it ‘clouded’ the issue. However it didn’t quite work out as I’d planned as there was still plenty of confusion and somebody spotted the serial / date written on it and put two-and-two together…..and got exactly four!

    Clearly port wing. Longer edge of lights goes along wingspan on Canberra – topside camo is dark grey, underside is light aircraft grey, topside wraps round onto underside. How can this be such a long discussion!!

    Thank you for the definite ‘port’ identifications (everybody)…..it makes one theory more probable…..but obviously doesn’t prove it!

    Testimony from the pilot states that during a turn to port an impact was felt and it was assumed that this was the impact of one of the ‘missiles’ seen being launched a few seconds earlier.

    Unlikely to have damaged the starboard wingtip in a turn to port, you see. 🙂

    in reply to: Canberra Expertise Required – What Is This? #1231790
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Your saying this may be Dornier ?

    😀 😀 😀

    in reply to: Liquid cooled radials #1163238
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    BMW 803 28-Cylinder, 83.5 Litre, 4000 HP, Water-Cooled Radial! 😀

    in reply to: Not a Spitfire #1163567
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Hurricane, would be my guess.

    in reply to: Record Breaking Wellington Bomber Build #1166341
    Creaking Door
    Participant
    in reply to: General Discussion #339242
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Don’t say anything bad about Ms Gibson, she helped me through my teenage years!

    O…o…o…only in your dreams? 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 10,531 through 10,545 (of 12,419 total)