You are welcome.
Sorry, couldn’t resist…..not really intended as a serious comment. :diablo:
However, I would say there would have been significant differences between the abilities of the Bristol fighter and the (wildly optimistic) Hampden ‘fighter-bomber’ to defend themselves against the enemy aircraft they were likely to encounter.
Hi folks, out of interest, what type of camera is this please?
Did you notice the number XA902 painted onto the camera body?
I could be wrong but that looks like an aircraft serial to me…..and XA902 was a Vulcan bomber!
A bit of aggressiveness on the part of the pilot might have transformed that situation.
Thank you, Group Captain Blimp! :rolleyes:
Yes, Happy Birthday to the Royal Air Force! 🙂
…despite the long running Titanic interest, the sister ship story is interesting as well. Hospital ship, torpedoed etc etc.
Mined actually…..but still sunk by a U-boat.
Ironically the other sister, Olympic, rammed and sank a U-boat that was trying to torpedo her…..one-all then! :diablo:
…despite the long running Titanic interest, the sister ship story is interesting as well. Hospital ship, torpedoed etc etc.
Mined actually…..but still sunk by a U-boat.
Ironically the other sister, Olympic, rammed and sank a U-boat that was trying to torpedo her…..one-all then! :diablo:
In November 1917 the Germans managed to transport over 30,000lb of supplies by air, over a distance of 4200 miles…..non-stop! 😉
Any engineer will point out most structures have to deform under load to some degree…
…but a good engineer will point out that all structures have to deform under load to some degree! 🙂
I do remember watch a war time film of a Wellington being made in a day.
This one you mean?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVk1OP_LQH4
(There is a better quality version of this on YouTube but I can’t find it.)
Interestingly the geodetic construction seems to lend itself very well to construction from relatively small sub-assemblies.
Shouldn’t it have been called “John Nicol likes people to think he flew, but is really only a passenger in….”
I’m not sure I would describe him as a passenger!
While we are on the subject; how many combat missions have you flown, how many times were you shot down, where were you held prisoner and were you tortured?
Just asking. :diablo:
What,even my husband’s verruca ? Blimey.
No…..you need duct tape to cure that. 😉
What,even my husband’s verruca ? Blimey.
No…..you need duct tape to cure that. 😉
But to answer your question – yes the RFC did have NCO pilots and I think it would be fair to say that most countries did…
Thanks for that. I’ve been doing a bit of Googling too and it seems that James McCudden was a sergeant pilot with 29 Squadron, also, according to Wikipedia:
“Using his knowledge as a mechanic, he effectively supercharged his aircraft to give it an additional 4,000ft altitude ceiling.”
While he may have used his mechanical knowledge to good effect, I doubt very much that he supercharged any of his aircraft!
Were there NCO aircrew (or even pilots) flying with the RFC during the First World War and would officer status initially only be a question of ‘class’? I seem to remember seeing a photograph of James McCudden wearing sergeant’s stripes; was this when he was a mechanic or when flying as an observer?
It is a great pity that there is no hope of any such co-operation in the UK between extremely knowledgeable and dedicated civilian enthusiasts and the MOD. Much could be achieved that way.
Could you (or anybody else with similar views) explain why you think that is the case?