The one I always find amusing is the one about the vulcan anti-radar missions, flying all the way to the falklands, then the argie’s turned the radar off, and the missiles couldn’t locate any target, not cricket eh?
The primary target for the Vulcan missions armed with Shrike missiles was the long-range ANTPS-44 surveillance radar that the Argentines were using to track the Sea Harriers.
The problem with attacking this was partly that the Argentines switched it off, or reduced the signal strength (cricket) but mainly that they soon moved it close to the civilian housing in Stanley to use the local population a ‘civilian shields’ (not cricket)!
There was a limited success with one mission (3rd June) when a Shrike missile destroyed one of the Skyguard radars for the 35mm AA guns at Stanley. The four crew manning the radar were all killed.
I also remember being told about RAF Phantoms alledgedly operating out of Chile by a certain former Phantom pilot at Dx who is no longer with us…..
At last another slant on this story, I thought I was the only one to hear about it.
I was told of this by my sister in laws brother in law, who was training to be a Harrier pilot at the time of the conflict.
According to him, the Phantoms were crated up somehow and sent by sea to Chile, the Chileans being concerned that if Argentina were succesful, then they would be next for a bit of land grabbing.
He also claimed that the theory was that if things got a bit untenable in the Falklands, that a few Phantoms over Argentina would make them think again.
Sounds a bit dubious to me, but thats what I was told, to hear a similar story related by who I assume to be MH makes you wonder.
Like these?
I’m beginning to think we’re not exactly getting a truly representative set of results here. :rolleyes:
What is it they say; there are lies, damned lies, and statistics!
I’m not saying that those who scored 20/20 didn’t get that result but I’m thinking those with lower scores weren’t so keen to post.
Many thanks to those brave enough to post non-perfect scores. 🙂
I’m beginning to think we’re not exactly getting a truly representative set of results here. :rolleyes:
What is it they say; there are lies, damned lies, and statistics!
I’m not saying that those who scored 20/20 didn’t get that result but I’m thinking those with lower scores weren’t so keen to post.
Many thanks to those brave enough to post non-perfect scores. 🙂
Here is my experience from the last four or five years.
Parking can best be described as variable. I’ve arrived early and been parked (or stuck in a queue) in a field miles from the crowd-line and I’ve arrived late and been parked right by the museum buildings. You will not have a choice where to park so my advice would be arrive early and don’t rely on being near your car. The direction you arrive from will also make a difference and usually you don’t get a choice as to direction you leave!
Flying proper doesn’t start until 13:00 or later so if you arrive early you’ll have time to look round the museum. It will be busy and you’ll probably feel you have rushed it a bit but if you’re only there for the day it is better than nothing. There are also plenty of stalls selling books, models and other stuff.
As has been said the museum closes far too early so everybody is forced to leave at the same time although I did manage to get locked in one of the hangars once, which was great, until the lights went out!
Bring a hat! Four hours of non-stop flying will get you seriously sunburnt (even in England) and it will keep the rain off too.
It may be worth bringing your own food and drink.
Excellent Photographs. Thanks for posting! 🙂
You can have an extra point if you correct my previous post 😀
That‘s better than what I thought it might be.
🙂
You can have an extra point if you correct my previous post 😀
That‘s better than what I thought it might be.
🙂
How embarrassing! :o:o:o
I just couldn’t get the metaphor / simile / onomatopoeia / alliteration stuff right, screwed up the whose / who’s thing and couldn’t spell accommodation (still can’t – thanks spell-check)!
Still given the general level of posts on this forum I shouldn’t get the worst score so long as people are honest (no implication in that by the way).
Roll-on next week’s maths test! 🙂
How embarrassing! :o:o:o
I just couldn’t get the metaphor / simile / onomatopoeia / alliteration stuff right, screwed up the whose / who’s thing and couldn’t spell accommodation (still can’t – thanks spell-check)!
Still given the general level of posts on this forum I shouldn’t get the worst score so long as people are honest (no implication in that by the way).
Roll-on next week’s maths test! 🙂
What kind of panic stricken world is it, when peoples first assumption is terrorist attack?
It’s almost as if our governments want us to live in fear of terrorism! :rolleyes:
I stand corrected…..Phew! 🙂
Wasn’t the layout of the Harrier’s engine / nozzles originally conceived by a Frenchman…
…sorry, blasphemy! 😮
When is the ‘Harrier’ episode on by the way?
I don’t think many in the UK would get past “don’t cling so hard to your possessions”! :rolleyes:
I don’t think many in the UK would get past “don’t cling so hard to your possessions”! :rolleyes: