dark light

Creaking Door

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 12,181 through 12,195 (of 12,419 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #321258
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Rugby Radio Station

    There is a very good website about Rugby Radio Station including details of the demolition of some of the 820 foot high masts here:

    http://www.subbrit.org.uk/sb-sites/sites/r/rugby_radio/index.shtml

    in reply to: Clocks go Forward tonight #1933907
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Rugby Radio Station

    There is a very good website about Rugby Radio Station including details of the demolition of some of the 820 foot high masts here:

    http://www.subbrit.org.uk/sb-sites/sites/r/rugby_radio/index.shtml

    in reply to: Falklands 25th Flypast #1263537
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Don’t forget the helicopters!

    Perhaps one RAF aircraft that should have ‘pride of place’ in any flypast is Chinook HC1 ZA718 ‘Bravo November’.

    This was the only Chinook to survive the destruction of Atlantic Conveyor by Exocet and was the only Chinook available to the British forces until after the end of the war.

    Last sighting I had ZA718 was still earning her keep (23 years later) out in Iraq!

    in reply to: Falklands 25th Flypast #1263554
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    I know there will be costs involved be could one of the surviving Harriers not become a travelling exhibit and attend a few events, displayed on Horse Guards Parade for a week, and then to airshows at Waddington, Duxford, Fairford?

    I would really like to see it appear at musuems who could offer it a home for a week or two, Newark, Coventry, Yeovilton?

    While I applaud your sentiments maybe some other museums would benefit more.

    Newark, Coventry and Yeovilton have all got Sea Harriers of there own. 😀

    in reply to: Vulcan v SHAR in the Falklands. #1264108
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    “Flying [a Shackleton] from Ascension to the exclusion zone, how long could you remain on task before you would have to ditch?”

    Answer 30 minutes and we could do it 5 times.

    I know the Task Force were desperate for AEW cover but that simply beggars belief…and some people thought the Vulcan raids were scraping the barrel!

    in reply to: Falklands Aircraft Kills #1264309
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    I thought it was excellent, a real insight into the thought process of the Task Force commander.

    It was particularly good on the war from the viewpoint of the frontline ‘picket’ Type 42 destroyers (Woodward had once been captain of Sheffield) and also particularly good on the reasons and practicalities behind the sinking of Belgrano (Woodward was a submariner by trade).

    in reply to: Falklands Aircraft Kills #1264552
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Now, Glasgow is a different matter. What range from Sheffield was she at the time of the attack? I would suggest she would have been spaced at least 60nm away on the ‘outer-screen’ and down threat (SW & NW of the Main Body) with Sheffield…………she may have spotted the SuEs on 965?.

    The information I have is that Sheffield and Glasgow were ‘twenty miles’ apart at the time of the attack (from One Hundred Days – ‘Sandy’ Woodward).

    in reply to: Falklands 25th Flypast #1264743
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    RE: SE aircraft over London…
    I saw a SE helicopter (JetRanger) over the Houses of Parliment area during the Queen Mothers funeral event.
    Special use permit for media or something?

    Can’t a single-engined helicopter ‘auto-rotate’ to land vertically on engine failure?

    in reply to: Falklands 25th Flypast #1264946
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Hmmm…… Single engined aircraft (Harriers) overflying a high population area. Hmmm we’ll see.

    The ‘single-engined aircraft’ card has been played before to stop the Sea Harrier / Harrier flying over London…

    …never seems to stop the Red Arrows though in their single-engined Hawks.

    in reply to: Falklands Aircraft Kills #1265043
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    One thing though, are you sure it was the 965 radar that did the detecting and not the echo foxtrot band 992?

    Not sure at all…and happy to be set-straight by someone with first-hand knowledge.

    The 1950’s technology Type 965 is often given as a major reason for the loss of HMS Sheffield, maybe that assumption is wrong.

    The 992 radar was ‘newer’ than the 965 but I think still ‘old’ technology but I’ve never heard it mentioned in any account of the loss of Sheffield.

    in reply to: Falklands Aircraft Kills #1265100
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Hindsight and HMS Sheffield

    HMS Sheffield is transmitting on SCOT satellite-communication terminal which effectively ‘deafens’ the UAA1 ESM system.

    The Type 965 air-surveillance radar in HMS Sheffield didn’t detect either the two Super Etendard or the Exocet missiles or if either were detected the detection wasn’t convincing enough for chaff to be fired.

    HMS Glasgow detects the radar transmission from the two Super Etendard with UAA1 ESM and then detects them with an identical Type 965 air-surveillance radar at forty-five miles (Glasgow and Sheffield are about 20 miles apart).

    A warning is broadcast to HMS Invincible (and the rest of the Battle Group) and Chaff fired with the Super Etendard contacts at thirty-eight miles out.

    HMS Glasgow transmits radar images on Link 10 to the Battle Group.

    The Force Anti-Air Warfare Commander (FAAWC) in HMS Invincible is not convinced (there have been several ‘false-alarms’ that morning and Chaff supplies are limited – each warship carrying enough for only seven complete ‘salvos’).

    HMS Glasgow detects the two Exocet missiles with Type 965 air-surveillance radar at twelve miles. A warning is again broadcast to HMS Invincible (and the rest of the Battle Group) but the FAAWC remains unconvinced.

    HMS Glasgow attempts to destroy the Exocet missiles with Sea Dart but the targets are too low and fast and radar contact is too fleeting to lock-on.

    One of the Exocet missiles hits HMS Sheffield approximately 120 seconds after it was fired.

    in reply to: Vulcan v SHAR in the Falklands. #1265227
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Mind u didnt know that NZ sent one of their frigates out so we could get one back.

    Australia did make a contribution of a different kind…

    …Flight Lieutenant Martin Withers who captained Black Buck 1 and 7 was an Australian (serving in the RAF).

    in reply to: Vulcan v SHAR in the Falklands. #1265237
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Goodness, I turn my back for a few days and find people hijacking this interesting thread…

    Are you claiming ‘sovereignty’ of this thread? 😀

    in reply to: Vulcan v SHAR in the Falklands. #1265246
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Just to clear up the ‘sale of carrier’ issue.

    Before the Falklands it was proposed to sell HMS Invincible to Australia. During the war New Zealand sent a frigate (HMS Canterbury?) to relieve an RN warship in the Gulf. Embarrassed by this assistance, Australia offered to relinquish the purchase of HMS Invincible which Britain accepted (much to the disappointment of the RAN).

    HMS Hermes wasn’t sold to India until much later (1986) when all three Invincible class carriers were in service.

    in reply to: Vulcan v SHAR in the Falklands. #1265691
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    …reading Sandy Woodwards book, our Gov didnt seem to keen on going via the UN either, he gives the impression that Mrs T & the gang were going flat out for a fight.

    Argentina had already started a war.

    By the time Argentina was in possession of the Falklands what good would talking in the UN have done?

    I’m sure Argentina would not have abandoned the Falklands unless force was used.

    Britain had a UN resolution that approved military force to liberate the Falklands…and Thatcher chose to use that option.

    What would you have done at that point?

Viewing 15 posts - 12,181 through 12,195 (of 12,419 total)