What happened to the IX? Is it documented exactly what happened to it?
I seem to recall reading somewhere that it was converted back to a landplane. Anybody know better?
A curious (and regretable) thing about this crash is the way it has been overlooked in most histories of the Sunderland. It doesn’t get listed in the Sunderland Crash log and I haven’t seen photos of it or a description in the major Sunderland books.
Thanks to Newforest for finding that website.
Allan
Great photos Vultee. I wasn’t aware this technique had ever actually been tried, never mind photographed.
Thanks for sharing it
Allan
Odd thing for that website to imply.
From the 1914 Flight: “Mr. Louch, therefore, holds the handsome Wakefield Cup for one year, and wins the gold medal, both presented by Alderman Sir Charles Wakefield, D.L., J.P.”
http://www.flightglobal.com/PDFArchive/View/1914/1914%20-%200890.html
One could spent a lot of time tracing further but everytime I look at Flight I get distracted by lots of other interesting things.
Allan
Keith,
Found this for you from Flight 1913:
http://www.flightglobal.com/PDFArchive/View/1913/1913%20-%200919.html
Allan
Hi,
You’ve probably already found this one as well:
http://www.fai.org/aeromodelling/f1/wakefield/LordWakefield
Lord Wakefield of Hythe (formerly Sir Charles Wakefield) is not to be confused with Edward, Lord Wakefield whose experiments in the Lake District resulted in the first aircraft to fly from water in the UK in November 1911. Edward’s nephew was Wavell, also later Lord Wakefield, who was in charge of the ATC during World War II. It seems to be the name to have to get ahead in aviation.
Allan
The Sunderlands were, of course, based at Calshot. At that time 235 OCU was the main flying boat training unit which operated out of Calshot – hence the large number of Sunderlands you saw. 235’s unit code letter was D. If you look closely at the film The Yangtse Incident you will see the Sunderland in it is D-L RN271 from Calshot which took part in the filming without even an attempt to cover up its day to day markings.
I have a couple of 235 OCU pics but nothing from the Calshot airshows.
Allan
If they did, it might look something like this….
I doubt it – they would be accused of copying.
The point is, artists are invited to suggest what should go on the vacant plinth and then the some are selected. With the current trends in contemporary art (particularly the dreadful remoteness of art from us normal people) we are unlikely to see a Spitfire, BoB or similar being the themes. But trends change.
Superb photos Robbo.
The Battle of Britain monument not being an acceptable tribute or work of art?
Perfectly acceptable and more easily understood by the people who see it – as are those superb sculptures at the NMA you’ve highlighted. I simply missed out the words “on the vacant plinth”.
Unless anyone can beat this monster of an aircraft it looks like I’ve won.
See here http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread198736/pg1
Well, if we are into flights of fantasy, I see your P.192 and raise you a Be-2500 – max take-off weight 5,500,000lb. Quite heavy for a paper plane [/irony]
http://www.beriev.com/eng/Be-2500_e/Be-2500_e.html
However, I think a Beriev A-40 would suffice as a modern jet flying boat. And it should be available to buy. 🙂
http://www.beriev.com/eng/A-40_e/A-40_e.html
But for a historic aircraft, I’d settle for a Short Solent.
Personally I’d vote for the Hurricane but I don’t see a chance for a poll – shame.
The principle of a changing programme of contemporary art seems to be well established now.
how about a burnt out car?
That is an anti-war protest. I think the idea is to use a car brought back from Iraq or create something to represent that conflict. There is another anti-war sculpture proposed for the plinth too.
Or how about this fantastic idea, let’s just get people to volunteer to stand on it and look like prannocks!
According to the ‘artist’, it’s supposed to represent ‘the subjective living body becomes both representation and representative, encouraging consideration of diversity, vulnerability and the individual in contemporary society’
The artist is Anthony Gormley – the one who created The Angel of the North and the figures on Crosby Beach. When I met him he was the nicest, most everyday bloke you could hope to have a chat with. It is a shame that the art world distances itself from the general public behind this sort of impenetrable language.
You never know, in the future an artist may decide to create a piece to commemorate the Battle of Britain, but not while anti-war art is the current vogue.
He was, of course, a New Zealander, and a great man.
I didn’t know he served in Catalinas – thanks for that. Channel 4 News today described him as an explorer, which I thought was right.
He was also, IIRC, the first man to the South Pole (in 1958) after Amundsen and Scott. He was supposed to wait for a rendevous with the Sir Vivian Fuchs’ Trans-Anarctic expedition but he wasn’t the sort to sit and wait so he made a dash for the pole and met the main expedition there.
http://www.nbr.co.nz/home/column_article.asp?id=19831&cid=15&cname=Politics
Great loss.
He was, of course, a New Zealander, and a great man.
I didn’t know he served in Catalinas – thanks for that. Channel 4 News today described him as an explorer, which I thought was right.
He was also, IIRC, the first man to the South Pole (in 1958) after Amundsen and Scott. He was supposed to wait for a rendevous with the Sir Vivian Fuchs’ Trans-Anarctic expedition but he wasn’t the sort to sit and wait so he made a dash for the pole and met the main expedition there.
http://www.nbr.co.nz/home/column_article.asp?id=19831&cid=15&cname=Politics
Great loss.
Hi Cees,
Question: If the airframe is in similar corroded condition, will it be recovered anyway
I’ve seen one of cylinders from that engine. It looked badly corroded but once the sea growth and other things had been gently scraped off (apparently with dental tools, must’ve taken days) it looked amazing. So yes, if it is in the same state as the bits I’ve seen, it will be recovered. However, as I understand it (and I’m not directly involved) the money they got recently is to pay for a survey which will determine what state it is in and what can be recovered.
Or would it be better to look for the remains of the prototype Shetland which sunk at it’s moorings?
Now that would be something. Unfortunately it is not to be. The fire that broke out in the APU during the night spread through the whole aircraft and it burned down to the waterline. The remains sank but were recovered very soon after. I’ve seen at photo (at the National Archives) of the recovered hull section broken into two pieces. Presumably they were scrapped. The Shetland II (civil version) languished at the back of the hangar at Belfast until it was scrapped.
I know it’s the only remaining Mk I Sunderland.
Yep and in wartime condition – and you know that I’m as biased about the Sunderland as others are about, oh I don’t know, the Halifax 😉
I wonder what will happen if this project winds up and the Sunderland stays down there. The money they will have to apply for is not in a bank account marked “only for aircraft recovery/restoration”. It is likely to be money for heritage generally, for economic regeneration, for other non-aviation projects and I think I’d be happy to see it attracted to aviation by a group of fellow enthusiasts.
I don’t know if the Sunderland can be recovered – I hope it can.
Allan
Weren’t they usually converted into RNLI or similar collecting boxes? If the RNLI owned some they might also have leads on where a few are now.
Edit: The collecting mines are for the Shipwrecked Mariners Society http://www.shipwreckedmariners.org.uk/textonly/index.html It is best to Google before posting.