dark light

Roobarb

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 1,070 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #993384
    Roobarb
    Participant

    Who said it was digital? 😉

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #993858
    Roobarb
    Participant

    Pen Pusher’s new camera’s motor drive…:D

    in reply to: 633 sqn Nord 1002 identities? #995632
    Roobarb
    Participant

    Many thanks to all who have given useful links etc.
    The info is out there somewhere!

    Roobarb

    in reply to: Memphis Belle Filming 1989 #996752
    Roobarb
    Participant

    I was working at Hatfield in those days and drove past DX daily – got quite used to seeing B-17’s! What took the biscuit was one early evening in June (a Friday IIRC) when I was working in the garage at home and there was this enormous racket in the sky. Over the houses opposite came the whole fleet, B-17’s, P-51’s, Buchons and a B-25, very low and forming up for (I assume) the ferry flight to Binbrook. The noise was amazing!

    It was indeed a Friday late afternoon Gordon. I was with my girlfriend in nearby Sawston when the whole formation took off. It even had Doug Arnold’s and Spencer Flack’s P51s in the formation. What a racket:) FANTASTIC! 😎

    in reply to: Golden Apple f86 display dates #1001989
    Roobarb
    Participant

    The F86 has been on the ground due to the fact that her J47 engine was in America undergoing some necessary repair work. These things take time and parts for this particular model are difficult to find. However, it has returned and we have refitted the engine and it was succesfully run on Thursday as per the DX Diary thread: http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=121487&page=10

    The wet start was intended and was part of the initial checks before full engine runs. There will be a report in the next issue of Flypast. It is hoped to re-fly the Sabre in the near future and I am sure one of the resident photographers will capture the event. 🙂

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #1003944
    Roobarb
    Participant

    From my own examination of the IWM Spitfire it would seem that the current paint scheme is all there is on it. It doesn’t have any indication of a previous scheme and I would suggest that it was given a bare metal strip at some point before its current colours. Digging for a previous scheme would be another fruitless Spitfire dig 😉

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #1004972
    Roobarb
    Participant

    At least you have the comfort of knowing that one of the IWM site vehicles managed to avoid you on this occasion…:D

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #1005118
    Roobarb
    Participant

    07Feb13
    Main news from Duxford today is that the Sabre has had it’s first engine run in Oooo, a long time. It did try to eat an engineer first but spat him out again. 😀 The aircraft was positioned so you couldn’t get a decent side view shot.
    [Brian

    It was perfectly positioned from where I was standing Brian… 😉

    in reply to: TE311 #1010744
    Roobarb
    Participant

    Official drwaings are a very good reference source as a starting point, but period photographs cannot be wrong at the end of the day. If there is a period photograph of the subject aeroplane, taken at the time period that it is to be portrayed as, then there is no argument. There are numerous errors and deviations from the official drawaings prevelant in nearly all colour schemes, even in service. When the unit I was on in the RAF became a reserve Squadron with a winged camel as it’s badge, No.45, the RAF painters managed to paint the Squadron badge with the wings on upside down on the first aircraft they did. Now if you restored that particular aeroplane to those Squadron markings, it would have to be wrong to be right. 🙂 Whether the “Walkway Inboard” stencil is correct to drawing or not, you can guarantee that some tw*t having a “sit in it” will ignore it and stand on the u/c bay bulge anyway, they usually do…:rolleyes:

    in reply to: TE311 #1012383
    Roobarb
    Participant

    I guess the paintshop concerned must’ve slipped with the tweezers…:rolleyes:

    in reply to: N3200-underside colours? #937852
    Roobarb
    Participant

    No roundels below wings, no gas patch on top. As per Mk12’s comments for the other colours. There was a picture of the fuselage that was put in FP an issue or so ago.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #950017
    Roobarb
    Participant

    You can’t go outdoors in daylight?

    Do you have any issues with garlic or mirrors?

    😮

    Moggy

    I also try to avoid wooden stakes…:D

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #950225
    Roobarb
    Participant

    Yes, see post 49. There’s a pattern forming 😉

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #950351
    Roobarb
    Participant

    This must be the first time a “Duxford Diary” has dropped off of the front page!:eek:

    Better do something about that. In the absence of the “real” photographers, here’s a couple of the corrugated ugly plane from yesterday morning around 8am. Bit on the dark side at that time, hence the flash.

    in reply to: Playground airframes #952305
    Roobarb
    Participant

    That does sound familiar. My brain is telling me Flambards Helston or Torbay aircraft museum? Probably wrong.

    Rob

    There was one at Dx for a while a long time ago to the south of the Superhangar, prob about 1989-90ish. Blue navy colours frrom memory. I don’t have a picture but I’m sure Duxman will have one. “Duxman to the forum, I say again Duxman to the forum…” 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 1,070 total)