dark light

Multirole

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 761 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Long Range Chinese Bomber #2161736
    Multirole
    Participant

    Does China have something like Quickstrike naval mines? I’ve never seen aerial delivery of mines from PLAAF or PLAN H-6 and Y-8 types.

    in reply to: Long Range Chinese Bomber #2162117
    Multirole
    Participant

    I would have thought something akin to a Tu-22m would have been ideal.

    H-6K has more range than Tu-22M already. China is probably looking for something in the B-1B class.

    in reply to: General Discussion #260023
    Multirole
    Participant

    The Greek socialist government probably haven’t entirely forgiven US and UK for siding against their grandfathers in the civil war.

    in reply to: The Greeks Vote Themselves out of Austerity! #1818928
    Multirole
    Participant

    The Greek socialist government probably haven’t entirely forgiven US and UK for siding against their grandfathers in the civil war.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2163778
    Multirole
    Participant

    It’s likely the chosen platform for Il-38 replacement shall be Tu-214, but on ground of standardization and reduced technological risks.

    But there are no evidences MS-21 would be neither smaller nor shorter legged compared to Tu-214.

    I would bet against it on ground of large use of composit structures and parts, potentially far more expensive to modify to adapt the airframe.

    When you don’t need to accommodate maximum number of paying passengers, a simple way of getting more range is to shorten the fuselage ala 747SP. Much cheaper than composites.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2163866
    Multirole
    Participant

    I wonder how well that thing would do with some PL-12s hanging under it. I mean might as well right?

    in reply to: test pilot: "F-35 can't dogfight" #2164533
    Multirole
    Participant

    I don’t see why this problem would not be fixable. They could enlarge the canope to have more space for the helmet’s movement and they can modify the head rest to make it smaller.

    That problem should have been identified by Beesley and co back in 2006 on AA-1.

    The F-35 is not very maneuvrable but the pilot should at least have the ability tu use the full maneuvrability available while using the advanced helmet to the maximum.

    Canopy change would require a significant redesign to off set changes to RCS and aerodynamics.

    Multirole
    Participant

    A Russian experts take on the F-35 & the meaning of 5th generation.

    Seems subtitles cut off a minute before the end.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2168009
    Multirole
    Participant

    I thought I read they were working on something based on the Tu-214.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2168125
    Multirole
    Participant

    What are the Russians replacing their Tu-142 with? Surely the Chinese want something better than Y-8X.

    in reply to: Tejas or JF-17 for Sri Lanka? #2168810
    Multirole
    Participant

    Still need confirmation for the Sri Lankan order, but I have to say that while the news is unsurprising, it’s still a bit unexpected. I never believed for a minute those who claimed SL lacked the budget or strategic necessity. But given the political orientation of the SL government as reported in the media you wouldn’t bet on this deal.

    Makes me question my assumptions regarding Sino-Sri Lankan relations. If they’re really going forward with the JF-17, it’s likely greater military cooperation will be forthcoming.

    in reply to: Tejas or JF-17 for Sri Lanka? #2168927
    Multirole
    Participant

    Neither.

    Air defense is not required against a non-existant enemy.

    sl should go NZ route.

    If Australia magically swapped places with Sri Lanka, I doubt it would disband its air force.

    in reply to: What happened to European mil aviation? #2170621
    Multirole
    Participant

    No one seriously thinks Russia is going to attack Nato countries, not even the Baltic states. If they did they would find the money very quickly. All this posturing is just to communicate mutual displeasure. It’s a bit like the phoney war where both sides performed theater to convince their constituents their leaders were “doing something” when actually they’re avoiding doing anything of consequence.

    in reply to: where is Western air power over Iraq? #2173058
    Multirole
    Participant

    80% of Iraqis no longer feel they are Iraqis first and foremost. If we accept Iraq is de facto three countries now we have to give the Sunnis some sort of political alternative to ISIS, one that the Sunnis are willing to fight for.

    in reply to: How good is China's J8II Finback? #2173072
    Multirole
    Participant

    What kind of relation does Bangladesh have with China, India, and Burma ?

    Long border with India, short border with Myanmar, no border with China.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 761 total)