dark light

Pit

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 489 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Iranian Su-30MK deal – up to 250 aircraft? #2525576
    Pit
    Participant

    Things have changed a lot Zare.

    In fact Sukhoi is trying to drag the Russian Federation MO to fund the Su-35, while in fact most of the items are private-founding (per example, last year it was reached accords to fund the N-035E for three years by joint accord by OAO Sukhoi, Ryazan GRPZ, NIIP and the Izd 117S by OAO Sukhoi, UMPO and NPO Saturn).

    They’re trying to made the government see that Su-35 would not interfere with I-21 project, so to buy some of them in the meanwhile.

    At the same time they proposed the project as Su-27SM2 as a continuation to Su-27SM, off course introducing most of those items developed for Su-35. Any way, seems not to be working, MO decided to get Salut Al-31FM1 modification for both, Su-32 (series post 2010) and Su-27SM (a prototype was tested for validation, last year)…no idea if they will fund money for it this year.

    Pero was discarded from any Russian modification program, and I don’t think they have exported it to anybody. Would have made sense if the program (Phase II of Panda Program, phase I was N-001VEP) was ready earlier in time for initial Su-30MK2 deliveries to China 3 years ago. Now it’s late, users trying to upgrade their Su-30MK2 (or Su-30MKK) would go to Su-35-alike program. Sukhoi proposed a similar program to China, last year.

    In other news, here you have the first pics of Su-27SM’s cockpit. From aircraft of 23 IAP that take part on Krylo-2007 maneuvers.

    http://pilot.strizhi.info/photos/d/1786-1/IMG_2744_sm.jpg

    in reply to: Iranian Su-30MK deal – up to 250 aircraft? #2525582
    Pit
    Participant

    Izd 117S is made to be modular and interchangeable with other engines of the Al-31F series, even if it was earlier reported that they weren’t. In fact the Izd 117S is a heavily reconstructed (upgraded) Al-31F, and it would be (as tech upgrade) available for mid-life overhaul of Izd-99V (Al-31F).

    LO reductions are being applied to Su-27S/SM Flanker of VVS at a rate of 7 per month as per some accounts. Some numbers said that more than 100 Flanker have been modified hence. LO reduction measures done by ITPE.

    Official name of the Su-35 proposal for VVS is Su-27SM2.

    In fact Su-35 is a heavily modified Flanker. In fact, just by replacing older avionics items and replacing by newer ones it have been saved more than 1000 Kg. Use of titanium and other materials have also lowered the airframe weight. The Su-35 lose the dorsal airbrake and replaces it by fuel.

    Avionics suite should be similar, in fact any russian standard equipment would be researched after the export-oriented one, using the experiences from it (funds mostly), just like USAF F-15E improvements gets juiciy from FMS derived programs.

    A Su-27SM2 would be different from a Su-35 as Zare mentioned, Su-35 is very different in some details. Avionic-wise should be similar.

    in reply to: Strong winds from Europe – Rafale vs Typhoon #2537952
    Pit
    Participant

    Nice work Scorpion.

    There is just one doubt I have…no, it’s not really a doubt.

    I don’t believe the Typhoon claim that the millimetric wave MAWS could acquire a missile at 100 km.

    MMW-radars suffer a lot from atmospheric absorption due to the wavelenght used. This is why you see these things in short range application, mostly on air-to-groud uses.

    I don’t see by any chance there is enough space on the airframe to put MMW aerials big enough to get those numbers, and the atmospheric absoportion would translate on transmission losses at those ranges that could not be understimate.

    I think this is the main reason why EVERYBODY is using passive infrared/UV for the MAWS role…

    Think about, what made you believe those tiny aerials on the MMW radar MAWS could detect an AAM up to 100 Km (we’re talking about pretty little targets, whose RCS should not be higher than 0.1 Sqm) and compare it with the publicised radar range (ECR-90 Captor-C) figures known…if that tiny thing could detect an AAM at 100 km, I’m sure the Captor could do it at 1000 km.

    For me, it sounds as propaganda, but let’s some radar expert with good english grammar to explain my point better 😀 😮

    in reply to: SU-30's to fly at Waddington airshow #2537963
    Pit
    Participant

    What an amazing experience!, those pics were just dream 20 years ago…many thanks!…

    I can just hope to see similar high-quality pics of Su-30MKI deployment to Red Flag next year!!!…:diablo: :dev2:

    in reply to: The Indian MMRCA Saga #2537967
    Pit
    Participant

    If I had to choose between Su 35 and MKI, I’d pick MKI anyday, fleet commonality is more important, the MKI MK3 version has gone through weight reduction as well by using composites.

    I would get the Su-35, made it a MKI-zation with wathever India felts they need or could contribute, made those nice MFD works with heavy attention to the MMI (big contribution by IAF people), let acquire 20 of them new, and then build the darn thing along the Su-30MKI, let try to get some comodities to introduce most of the changes of Su-35 to Su-30MKI production line (more fuel, lighter weight, and so) and be happy as hell :p :p :p

    Just fun, I hope the little MiG-35 get the contract, :p

    in reply to: Algerian air force #2542280
    Pit
    Participant

    MiG-29UBT at least SOC:

    http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/5465/mig2910jg5.jpg

    News from December 2006

    ALGERIA RECEIVES FIRST MiG-29SMTs

    MOSCOW [MENL] — Algeria has received the first advanced MiG-29s from Russia.

    The Algerian Air Force received two MiG-29SMT fighter-jets from RSK MiG. Russian industry sources said the aircraft arrived last week and was part of a multi-billion-dollar arms deal signed with the North African state.

    “The first two MiG-29SMT fighters have been shipped to Algeria this week,” an industry source told the Moscow-based Interfax news agency on Dec. 8.

    In March 2006, Algeria agreed to a $7.5 billion deal for the procurement of aircraft, main battle tanks and other military platforms from Moscow. Officials said the deliveries have begun and would accelerate during 2007.

    Pit
    Participant

    It is sold with A2A cueing

    Cueing is not surveillance Elp, think about a BIG telescope, which you use to see the sky…

    Now think IRST is just a radar that works on IR…one is used for cueing (or clasification), but you need a vector source, something where to look…radar, your mind…wathever.

    IRST is a suerveillance sensor, some of them indeed have cueing capabilities (working as an Imaging Infrared sensor, like AN/AAS-42), and some others (like this **** on Bug) no.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile [ News/Discussion] #1797115
    Pit
    Participant

    Why not to build interceptor missiles against the ABM :p 😀 😀

    Just put some interceptor missiles (IM) batteries near every ICBM silo, then when you launch the ICBM, and the NMD is “on” and starts launching their ABM, launch the IM against the ABM…deal done. 😀 😀

    in reply to: PAK-FA updated info, anyone? #2505999
    Pit
    Participant

    Let’s say: Thanks PiBu 😀

    Summeet, the source is:
    Vzlet journal, November 2005 edition, page 21.

    That’s it.:D

    in reply to: PAK-FA updated info, anyone? #2506130
    Pit
    Participant

    PiBu, is radar data and signal processor units on actual Zhuk-AE/FGA-29 the same that those on Zhuk-ME?…

    Would they be changed?, why not to use the new Solo-35 based solutions?

    And what’s the name of the RDP and Signal Processor of Zhuk-ME anyway?…we have info on Bars and other pieces, but non on this one!.

    Thanks :p

    in reply to: Karel Doorman Frigates to Portugal? #2059094
    Pit
    Participant

    😀 I will answer you the next month, after the maneuvers were finished 😀

    Any portuguese official would be there??…maybe??

    Pit
    Participant

    And how do you foresee a modernized MiG-31 going about doing that?

    The R-37 missile is said to be good for Mach 6 if that’s fast enough to catch the future ‘SR-72’, but I don’t see that happening – is the R-37 available with IR homing (R-37T)?

    We don’t here much about the IRST on the FOXHOUND, do we? Using it’s main radar the MiG-31 is almost a mini AWACS in range and processing power, but on IRST alone were talking about capability being reduced… ooh, let’s say for argument’s sake, down to the same capability as a MiG-29A – who knows.

    But the main question is, who’s going to vector (gci) this ‘emasculated’ FOXHOUND towards such a Mach-6 stealth plane – without the use of radar? :confused: :rolleyes:

    The IRST 😉

    in reply to: Karel Doorman Frigates to Portugal? #2059138
    Pit
    Participant

    Van Nes is slatted for deployment to the Caribbean Sea, for maneuvers along the Venezuelan Navy and the KW NA&A of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba…

    Maybe last deployment with the Royal Netherland Navy?

    in reply to: Flash Dance/Zaslon hyped to compete with AWG-9? #2506584
    Pit
    Participant

    Zaslon radar modes are pulse doppler modes.

    But PDS is a HRPF without FM mode, and that’s what aerospacetech says.

    in reply to: Flanker and training missiles #2507901
    Pit
    Participant

    martinez, aren’t the Izd-470-1UTM and Izd-470-3UTM the training blocks for R-27R/T that are used on training missile R-27UT?.

    That’s the info I have, could be wrong?

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 489 total)