You can get an even more realistic effect using tonal changes, softening and adding grain to the ‘film’.

And you can go the other way starting with old monochrome pictures.

That first picture has to be the best I have ever seen !!
Only three, or is that the best you could do ?
I’ve looked at this comment several times and thought it didn’t sound right.
Having finally read it again with my brain engaged, for 8 thousandths, read 1/125th.
1/125 = 0.008
a rose by any other name 😉
Slipstream: I hope your information is correct, because I will be repeating it parrot fashion at dinner parties when I want to impress!
I wonder what the constraints were on the builder of this Merlin model that made him choose that particular scale.
Janie..’tis all true, volumes are a cube function, areas are a square function. I am not sure what constraints were imposed, there may be a convention in the model world that dictates 1/5 scale. It would be more practical but more expensive to go for a larger size from a metalurgical aspect and where tolerances become less critical. The closer to full size you go the easier it is to adhere to the scaling factor on component parts. For example, a 2mm thick piece of dural is fairly stiff, reduce it to 0.4 mm and it bends like kitchen foil. This means that, for example, conrods that were made of aluminium in the original have to be made of steel in the model.
This will either impress or force a change of topic at your dinner parties 😉
I wonder if the fuel consumption is one-fifth of the original.
If it is 1/5 scale then the capacity should be 8 thousandths of the original and consequently the fuel consumption would be about the same if the rev’s were kept as per the full size. However, bearing surfaces would only be reduced by a factor of 0.04 so friction would be a significant factor….waffle …yawn…. wouldn’t ya just love one in an RC flying Spitfire….
I belive Meatheringham has a small museum/visitor centre and some of the original buildings although the airfield has now returned to agriculture. They also have a ghost apparently, The Meatheringham lady.
Is it possible that their ( Zeppelins ) destruction was ordered as part of the Versailles treaty? In any case the scrap value of the metals in post war Germany faced with reparation payments would have made it unlikely that any were preserved.
How about the rugby players John Orwin ( Cpl at Brize Norton 1980’s ) and Rory Underwood ( Flt Lt ).
Slipstream: My Latin is rusty. What does your signature mean?
Janie
(Ego sum pulcra; ego sum doctra)
It is supposed to mean ‘unusual old man that fly’ although literally it is something like Strange old men with wings. I think.
I heard about barry’s Spitfire in 1990, I believe It was vandalised beyond repair in the mid 90’s (though I wonder if it would ever have been allowed to fly anyway) and was donated to a museum at Tangmere.
Having spent time working with the French Airforce at Mont de Marsan I can say that they do not treat all English people like dirt. I was made very welcome !
They did say that the Spitfire would form the basis for a restoration to static display standard. I agree that this program would have come across better if recorded and edited but interesting never the less.
I always understood electrical bonding to be for preventing a potential difference build up ( static electricity ) to eliminate the risk of sparks which could ignite fuel vapours.
I believe the change was to increase the rudder area to counteract the torque from a more powerful engine and a 4 blade prop. I also believe that a spin off of this was an increase in the crosswind limit. Trimming would be carried out the same – to relieve pressure on the stick. With regard to the rudder, the pilot may notice an increase in the force needed to move it in flight, not sure really, you’d need to ask someone lucky enough to fly both types.