dark light

DaveR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 393 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: American Main/Tail wheel identification #994485
    DaveR
    Participant

    I dont actually have them but went to look. I was looking at some potential typhoon main wheels and didnt have the chance to look closely at these. They definitely look tail wheel over mains and the size of them leads me towards b-17, knowing the american types broken up on the airfield. Will see if I can get a pic but in the mean time anyone have a close up of b-17 tail wheel to hand?

    in reply to: RAF Part/Drawing/Stores references #994795
    DaveR
    Participant

    Hi Bruce,
    Thanks for the reply, I knew that Guy had reverse engineered one of the machines (T.D. 1035) and had based this around some of the A.Std rollers found in south africa (I believe). I have a copy of many of the A.Std items but this new numbering system was something I came across digging through the AP’s. I hadn’t come across this before and was wondering if it was particular to the manufacturer of the tools rather than the design authority (Hawker) or the RAF stores reference (the 26B number)? Sometimes some of the original drawings from a manufacturer still exist and I have even found some in local libraries when the companies archives were donated.

    in reply to: Hawker dataplate and constructor numbers #1000376
    DaveR
    Participant

    Having studied drawings, manuals etc for the Hawker Family I have found that even the data plates had a drawing number. These indicated where the plate was to be located, the layout, what was to go on it, what font etc etc. I could obviously be wrong but I am sure that 41H 68118 for the Hawker Hind, for instance, is simply the drawing number for the data plate (68118) in the Hawker Family (41H). 68118 fits nicely into the range of drawings that I have for the bi-planes and in particular the Hind (the Tornado & Typhoon starting around the 99000 mark).

    in reply to: Possible Napier Sabre #1002266
    DaveR
    Participant

    unable to get hold of them at the moment….airfield seems to be closed in general. Sent you a mail Mark.

    Dave

    in reply to: Possible Napier Sabre #1004407
    DaveR
    Participant

    Mark,
    Any chance you could message me if you get a few minutes (think your box is full)?
    Cheers
    Dave

    in reply to: Possible Napier Sabre #1004641
    DaveR
    Participant

    Hi Mark,
    Just sent you a mail through here (can’t send pm’s to you)
    Cheers
    Dave

    in reply to: Flying Legends 2013 details #932432
    DaveR
    Participant

    I normally don’t contribute to threads such as these but I just had to add my bit….

    For the past 13 years I have gone to the Air Tattoo with a group of friends and spent the weekend however; this year I wanted to go to Legends (I am a piston engine lover not particularly jet) and now my son is 4 he is starting to really appreciate the aircraft. We were there Saturday this year and combined with the fantastic weather, the absolutely incredible aircraft, pilots, ground crew and staff I thought the commentry was excellent. My son (and my father) found his commentry informative and it lead to my son asking questions that he would not necessarily have asked. A previous comment said it drowned out the sound of the engines…really? must have been stood under the speakers then because when the aircraft came by it definitely drowned out the commentry from where we were.

    Compared to the likes of Cosford then entry was particularly easy (park and ride) with the longest wait being for the bus at the end which was only 30 minutes (although with a tired 4 year old it felt like 40 hours 🙂 ). My only criticism of the whole day was the endless corporate or gold pass tents….there was not enough space for us normal people so the tents were in the way for the low flypasts. We later moved to the end by the Dak and Bearcat, sat on the grass and had a fantastic view. It allowed us to see the lovely Dak and Hawkers (I have a bias to anything Hawker) start up and taxi out…plus most of the aircraft taxiied by when they landed (my sons favourite being ‘Snafu’ which had him very excited when the pilot waved ‘to him’).

    Overall I would like to buck the trend and say well done to the commentry…and overall well done to everyone involved in Legends, what a fantasticly well organised show.

    in reply to: Fundraising Effort to Purchase Hurricane AM274 #939364
    DaveR
    Participant

    I have followed the work that John has done on his Hurricane and it is top quality, the pictures of the progress are amazing. It is a shame he is selling after getting so far but that does seem like a bargain price considering what is there and what has been done so far…

    in reply to: Typhoon JR218/JR313 #941345
    DaveR
    Participant

    Dave,
    Sent you a PM….
    cheers
    Dave

    in reply to: Typhoon JR218/JR313 #950542
    DaveR
    Participant

    Hi Bob,
    This is where these things always become interesting (rumours that is). I had heard that many years ago Mike Cookman was looking in the Staffordshire area for Typhoon Wing(s) that were being used on a farm as a fence. They were apparently found at some stage by an ATC unit but that is where any information I had went cold. Unfortunately I never had the chance to talk to Mike and as far as I know that information stream went cold, certainly the ATC unit in the Lichfield area had no records or memories of it. However, I did hear from a member here that there was the possibility of a Typhoon wing being used as a bridge over a Burn on or near a Farm in Scotland (an ideal platform to be able to get across in the need of an emergency which would not necessarily have been taken away afterwards). I am hopeful he gets back in touch through here!!! This could be one in the same rumour you are referring to, a completely different one or perhaps be a reference to the fences on a farm in Staffordshire.

    I am hoping to go to Scotland in a few months to do some poking around to follow up some other information and I wanted to slot in following up on the Wing(s) while there.

    Thanks for your reply by the way….
    Dave

    in reply to: Dutch Typhoon rear fuselages moved #951765
    DaveR
    Participant

    Nils? would that be reference to a museum, area or person? Did you take that pic yourself? It is an interesting engine as it does look like a crash landing recovery, the tubes on the lower half of the engine frame look to have been replaced presumably because it needed to safely support the weight. Fairly undamaged but I wonder if any of the ancilliaries survived anywhere…

    in reply to: Dutch Typhoon rear fuselages moved #952406
    DaveR
    Participant

    You are quite right Good Vibs….when I say ‘mine’ I am always referring to my custodianship of the fuselage. Hopefully it is my little way of trying to help the current and next generations remember the Typhoon and their crews, my son is already converted at the age of 4 (his grandparents and aunt say it is cruelty!!!).

    I don’t know who took this photo, so unfortunately I can’t acknowledge them here, but is this the engine you were thinking of? The 4 blade prop certainly looks like a forced landing rather and a full crash.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]217905[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Dutch Typhoon rear fuselages moved #952913
    DaveR
    Participant

    Good vibs….
    Thanks for finding some more information for me…I would love to hear from anyone who may know what happened to the engine as it is on my list as a question mark (there have been quite a few that have been logged a separate survivors over the years but are in fact one in the same). Sadly I could tell the frame it was mounted on was a Tempest from the spar attachment points, does that mean I have been a Typhoon nut for too long?, so unless they found original engine/cockpit mounts and placed a Typhoon Sabre on it then it must have been Tempest. Would love to see the pics if you find them.

    The fuselage you mention at Twenthe is my fuselage…the museum closed some years ago and the owners had it on long term loan at Fort Veldhuis, as mentioned before it is well worth a trip there as you would spend hours examining the recoveries and the detailed research they have completed there!!! you also get to see Cees’ work on Halifax and Hampden.

    note: The sectioned Sabre at Duxford was donated from Cambridge Engineering Department…I believe it came from Napiers and was unfortunately sectioned by the engineering department.

    in reply to: Dutch Typhoon rear fuselages moved #952916
    DaveR
    Participant

    There are probably enough for a 3rd centre section using original cockpit and there is a Tempest II rear fuselage around that when looked at in detail is the same as the Typhoon even down to the cockpit attachment brackets on Frame 2 (well a late sliding canopy Typhoon that is). As mentioned before the wings are the main structure that don’t really exist in any quantities (unless I can finally track down some of the rumours I have heard) however, they are a relatively simple design and there are some spars around to copy.

    in reply to: Dutch Typhoon rear fuselages moved #953085
    DaveR
    Participant

    There are definitely enough parts out there for another example….the wings are the easy part and all the difficult ones I know locations!! I even saw some front main wing spar girders for a typhoon the other week….
    I would live to pair the cockpit at duxford with the fuselage…not sure they would let it go though 🙁

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 393 total)