yeap do a search on force magazine its 2nd result you will get
Oh cheers, I made the mistake of putting in too many search terms.
Daniel
Didnt Iran already operated the TOR-M1 , is this a follow on order.
Tor-M1 is a short range defensive weapons , US or Israel should not have any problems with this system
On the contrary the Tor-M1 could present some difficulties, particularly for the standard US attack pattern. The system is typically quoted as being an anti-cruise missile system. It could be deployed to provide defence for other air defence systems, radars, airbases, comms nodes and power plants. If it lived up to its advertising then it potentially impair the USs ability to significantly disrupt an enemy’s air defence network with a stand-off strike, there-by necessitating the more deliberate and costly (in terms of personnel) attack using traditional SEAD/DEAD methods.
Daniel
orekhs according to the article anyway dan force is indian def newsmagazine the same article had piece on P-28 corvette which was highly controversial.
Cheers Jon. Do they have a website? Google didn’t turn one up for me.
Daniel
supposed to be 48 vl shtil,3 kashtan and couple of ak-630 according to force but it hasnt been comfirmed.
Force?
Daniel
[COLOR=blue]Acquired Russian aircraft carrier to arrive in 2008 [/COLOR]
Do we know anything about the weapons fit of Vikramaditya yet? Barak and CIWS?
Daniel
wanshan y would wny one want an argie type 42 there older than the ours (royal navy) and theres only on ein service the other one is used for spares
He meant the RN vessels as they get retired. I reckon the batch 3s would still be a decent buy. Then again B&V might have something they can offer for the MEKO 360s.
Daniel
Wondering if anyone knows names and pennant numbers for the new vessels comeing into Chilean service? I assume they will generally take the names of the vessels they replace. The have the two L class from Netherlands and the three Type 23s from the UK to arrive.
Daniel
The second was laid up some time ago and used as a spares hulk to keep the Hercules in some form of operational state. IIRC the Sea Dart system has been U/S for sometime. UK-Argentine relations have improved over the last decade or so so I’d be vey interested to hear if this vessel has been getting any attention and if there are any plans for future upgrades/refits. Perhaps buy one of the Batch 3 42s when they are retired or will attention instead be focused on the Almirante Brown MEKO 360 DDGs that probably have a lot more life and scope for modification?
Daniel
from JDW 22 Nov 2005
In Brief – Pakistan gets additional Harpoons
Boeing has been awarded a USD62.5 million Foreign Military Sales contract for 50 Harpoon all-up-round (AUR) missiles, consisting of 40 Tactical Block II Air-launch AUR missiles and 10 Tactical Block II Grade B (surface-launched) AUR missiles destined for Pakistan. The contract also includes 20 MK607 Air-launch AUR containers and 10 MK631 Canister AUR containers for Pakistan; two Exercise Sections for Australia and one for Japan; and two MK592 Exercise Section Shipping Containers for Australia and one for Japan. This work is due to be completed in June 2006.
danrh, the IAF is quite secretive about its ASM inventory and is very selective about showing them.
Actually I was going to bring that up since yours truely did post the very first pic of an IAF Armat (with the Jags) on this very forum. 😀
What about the Sea Eagle? Would anyone have known that the Il-38s carry them?
Are the import of EL/L-8222s or Litenings mentioned? Griffin LGB kits? KAB-500/1500s?
What is actually formally documented is but a small fraction of higher profile equipment.
The SPIRI database purports to be of “major conventional weapons”. I belive this is the reason why items such as the EL/L-8222s, Litening II pods and Griffin kits are not mentioned. I did some cross checking and there is no mention of these things under the Israeli section and since I know Australia has purchased the ECM and targeting pods as well I checked there and also no mention. However its seems there are plenty of listings of AShMs so apparently they fall within the purview of the monitoring group. I note that the Russian section even details the sales of the Kh-31 missiles to the PRC yet no mention of the same to India. The Sea Eagles are not mentioned since they predate the 1995 start date of the database. Of course the SPIRI database is not the only source of information that details deliveries, inductions etc to the IAF. Other sources such as BR, Janes etc regularly break news of deliveries, induction services, displays etcs yet all that we hear for Kh-31 is that a) the delievery platforms are in service and that some missiles were apparently ordered in 1999.
Maybe the IAF is, as Harry says, just particularly paranoid about anybody knowing it has AShMs. Not quite sure why the great secrecy on this particular class of weapon when we regularly see parades of Brahmos, BMs, SAMs, displays by new planes, port visits by new ships, have requisite disclosure of the purchase of torpedos (if the there is any weapon that could be kept secret it would have to be submarine torpedos) even such relatively mundane items as new small arms or armoured recovery vehicles.
Anyway this really isn’t important and I apologise for having taking so much of everybody’s time. If anyone check the links I posted earlier to our db encyclopedia they will have noted that the missiles are still listed on the MKI just with a later in service date so anyone who would prefer to utilise them still do so.
cheers
Daniel
Thank you for the feedback 🙂 Part of the reason why I remain unsure about the veracity of claims of the IAF being operational with the Kh-31 series of missiles is stuff like this.
Note: As per the annual United Nations (U.N.) conventional arms register, the Indian Government reported that it had purchased 30 R-77RVV-AE missiles in 1999 and 120 R-77RVV-AE missiles in 2000. These numbers suggest that the R-77RVV-AE is operational with the IAF, at a minimum with the upgraded MiG-21s and the Su-30s. In October 1998, a locally-upgraded MiG-29 test-fired a R-77RVV-AE air-to-air missile.
BR – R-77
a look through the SPIRI database seems to indicate that India is fairly diligent in its notifications with many items listed inlcuding R-27, R-77 and R-73 AAMs, Harpy AR UAVs, Klub SSMs, T-90 MBTs, Talwar FFGs, various radars, SAMs and artillery pieces. Even the Su-30 purchses themselves are listed. The Kh-31 series are impresive weapons but I don’t really that they are so revolutionary and wonderful that India would choose to hide thier accquisition while disclosing all these other systems, icluding some smaller items they probably could hide if they so desired. I mean we are all expecting the IAF the Kh-31, it is afterall almost an Su-30MK series signature weapon. I have no doubt that the IAFs MKIs could employ the missiles just that they are a current feature of the IAF inventory.
My thanks to those who took it upon themselves to disabuse me of the notion that the IAF has any particular interest in what we do or do not include as part of a Harpoon database 😉 A not so subtle attempt to goad a response which did however succeed. My apologies. Of course since Harpoon is merely a game and the databases the product of private individuals utilising open source references what we choose to has zero bearing on anyone but ourselves. That said we do like to try and do things to the best our abilities hence why I would even care about this. If anyone should be interested in seeing why all the fuss here is a link to the Su-30 page of our database encyclopedia and the encyclopeida main entry page Thank you 🙂
Daniel
So I’ll assume from the lack of response that there are in fact no sources to back up claims that Kh-31 missiles are actually in service with the IAF. Okay then we can take them off the current MKI version in the Harpoon database. Thank you.
Daniel
I’d be one of those who can’t see it.
Daniel
I’d be one of those who can’t see it.
Daniel
Well, as I said, still a normal punishment, he did cause several extra millions of tax payers’ money to be spent on this ship.
Now if only it was that easy to get rid of meddling politicians who regularly cause hundreds of millions of taxpayers dollars to be wasted on thier little pet projects.
Daniel