[QUOTE=RPG type 7v;1154031and by the way heres an exclusive
—-the mig I-2000 prototype flying 😮
http://youtube.com/watch?v=XIuqmQUE3U4&mode=related&search=[/QUOTE]
But why can’t we see it?
Has it already been shot down??:dev2: :dev2:
I read that, but I just figured that was a government umbrella organization that controls the missile design bureaus and manufacturers. Just like Rosonboronexport handles MiG and Sukhoi and Sukhoi handles Irkutsk and KnAAPO. For example, I was under the impression that all those missiles are being presented by Russia’s Tactical Missile Corp. even though the Kh-31 is a Zvezda product and the Kh-58 is Raduga.
Logan Hartke
A full list of the various subsidiaries which make up the structure of the “Tactical Missile Corporation JSC” is available from the English language version of their website found here:
http://eng.ktrv.ru/about_eng/275/?PHPSESSID=0e5ab8c3a6ec1b5acaf3ba91b69d793f
Click on the different subsidiary names for an explanation of what they actually produce and do.
But please, i hope the usual suspects will continue fearing. Never mind perspective, let’s fear the Bear! Putin equals Stalin! Those Tu-95s are WW2 relics armed with Czar Bombs! Czechoslovakia will be invaded again (… oh no, that country doesn’t exist anymore…) Russia does something! I’m sure you paranoiacs will gladly cough up the taxes to increase US defence spending to make it at least 5 times the amount of money the rest is wasting on defence.
Is there anybody panicking, I don’t here anyone complaining, not the Americans, not the British.
If anything, it’s the Russians who seem to be over-reacting to something or other by “sending the bombers in” in the first place.:rolleyes:
Just think of the myth that ‘the USSR overspent itself on defence during the Cold War’…
was it a myth?
40% of all new industrial plant in the Soviet Union was destined for the miltary-industrial complex, it’s estimated that 12-16 million people worked in the self same “complex” in the Soviet Union!
How many people worked the US or European “MI complexes”??
Frankly, the BM is boring like hell. Just your ordinary Flanker with some mysteriously invisible modifications.
You could say the same about all 3 Eurocanards – but at least the “Sushki” has vectored thrust…:)
simple schorsch the MiG-25 is a great aircraft more practical and adaptable than the YF-12 in fact they built 1200 of them when even no B-70 or F-12 did enter service.
The YF-12 wasn’t adaptable?
It was also available as reconnaisance type too, you know – it was called the A-12 and SR-71!:diablo: :diablo:
None of them were ever shot down in any of the thousands of sorties they carried out… how many MiG-25Rs were shot down?:rolleyes:
Will the Su-35 and MiG-35 fly at MAKS 2007? It starts tomorrow, right?
Has the Su-35 actually flown yet? I don’t think it has, and I think it’s just going to be a static display at MAKS.:(
I hope it does fly though, I’m picking up my free tickets for the show tomorrow!:p 😀
That’s the POW-MIA memorial flag.
Oh yeah, If I’d bothered to look closer at it I might have figured it out, just by actually reading what was written it!!:o 😮
http://www.homeofheroes.com/hallofheroes/1st_floor/flag/1bfb_disp9c.html
That’s the POW-MIA memorial flag.
Oh yeah, If I’d bothered to look closer at it I might have figured it out, just by actually reading what was written it!!:o 😮
http://www.homeofheroes.com/hallofheroes/1st_floor/flag/1bfb_disp9c.html
Most in service Bears were built in the 1980s and are not long in the tooth at all.
Yeah, you’re right there, but even if the Tu-95s are only a few decades old, they still represent fifties technology. All those huge propellor blades must give the BEAR the largest RCS of any aircraft in the world I’d imagine. The Tornado F3 should still be more than a match in detecting and catching the Tu-95.
Unless the Tu is launching ‘stand-off’ ‘Kh-55s’, in which case the BEAR’s RCS is not such a big issue…
Yeah really, nice shots. I really like the seventh one, I have no idea why…
Stanley Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey”?:cool:
What’s the black flag in the fourth picture, looked a bit like the ‘Jolly Roger’ for a moment?
Obelisk from “2001: A Space Odyssey”
Yeah really, nice shots. I really like the seventh one, I have no idea why…
Stanley Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey”?:cool:
What’s the black flag in the fourth picture, looked a bit like the ‘Jolly Roger’ for a moment?
Obelisk from “2001: A Space Odyssey”
Mind you, the Americans have continued to carry out reconnaisance flights along the coasts of China and the Russian Federation long after the end of the cold war – who can forget the USN P-3E that had to make a forced landing on a Chinese airfield after colliding with a PLAAF fighter jet in April 2001. It was carrying out an ELINT patrol on China’s coast.
The Russians, understandably, feel they have to be seen making an equal response.
Two can play at that game…:rolleyes:
I’m not saying Tornado F3s, F-15s, Mirage 2000s can’t do the “interceptions”, but these aircraft are getting long in the tooth 😉
They’re not as long in the tooth as the “BEAR”…;)
What exactly do they mean by patrol – how many sorties a month do we hope to see. Are these aircraft armed or will they just be information gathering reconnaisance flights, in which case what kind of info, and what do they hope to do with this info?
Sounds like a load of hot air!:rolleyes:
Moscow is protected against a limited ICBM strike by the System A-135 ABM network. And they did try to develop nationwide ABM systems, check this out:
http://geimint.blogspot.com/2007/06/russian-strategic-defense-part-2-abm.html
http://geimint.blogspot.com/2007/08/sary-shagan-birthplace-of-abm.html
Oh, I knew about that system, during the Cold war it was originally the A-35 sytem around Moscow with just a few dozen or so intercepter missiles.
What percentage of NATO’s thousands of ballistic nuclear warheads, homing in on the Soviet Union, do you think the A-35 system could ever have hoped to stop?