Crimea was independant between 1991-1993 (1992?).
It was only a gift (once again) offer to Ukraine to calm down west countries and US(OTAN) because a new Russian Federation ruling totaly Crimea and her strategic military bases and ports looked like a big menace against the west.
I am not really sure as to which country the Crimea belongs to.
I will say some good things about Russia’s seizure of the Crimea – A. it resolved the matter once and for all. B. there was no violence, nobody died.
Where can I see the horde of Russian tanks and aircraft? 🙂
There were no hordes of tanks aircraft and troops when Russia invaded the Crimea a few months ago, quite the opposite in fact – but Crimea is now a territory of the Russian Federation.
Mind you, Russian rocket (space launcher) motors, such as RD-180 could well be the most advanced in the world…?
Better than Chinese rockets at least.
Isn’t the powerplant on the Sukhoi Superjet mostly of French origin? Don’t some Aviadvigatel PS-90 jet engines have parts “made in America” included?
***Not much of a hero if she/he cannot even fly a plane***
You’d never see Chuck Norris not flying a plane if needs be… or would he just roundhouse kick Alaska so hard it would move to wherever Chuck wanted it to?
John Rambo could fly everything – and shoot them down.
Andraxxus;2162872]Specially adapted = addition of oxygen bottle for zoom climb and thats it. Record breakers Ye-155R-1 and R-3 and Ye-155P-1 were the prototypes of MiG-25R and P variants; nothing more, nothing less. They had no airframe or engine modifications. In fact, they did go on with flight tests after the record attempts and IIRC Ye-155P-1 (or R-1?) was lost in an accident afterwards.
Well, I thought some of those Ye-155 had a lightened airframe and special powerplant – but I don’t see were this argument is leading to.
No idea but no MiG-25P was lost to Iranian aircraft, and stories about MiG-25 eluding half dozen missiles during gulf war would make me assume it did go fast enough.
I am not doubting it is faster than any other combat jet out there – USAF F-15s certainly had a hard time catching the beast.
According to Red Star series MiG-25 Foxbat book; “Missions were flown at maximum speed and 17000-23000m“, “As an excuse for their inability to intercept the elusive MiGs, the Israeli air defences stated that the object was clocked at M3.2”, “On one occasion Aleksandr Bezhevetz exceeded the speed limit to get away from pursuing phantoms; the flight data recorder showed that the Mach limit had been more than tripled (possibly meaning the redlined area between M2.5 and M2.83)”, “Other sources state that it was VVS pilot Krasnogorsky who should walk away with the record as he reached 3400 km/h (equals M3.21) in one of the sorties. This was dangerous because the airframe could be damaged by overheating, but careful inspection of the aircraft showed no apperant damage. Still the pilot recieved an unambigious debriefing after this incident”. Plus; “By then, Tumanskiy OKB had extended engine running time in full afterburner from three to eight minutes and then to 40 minutes. Thus virtually all sorties could be flown at maximum thrust; the R15B-300 turbojects proved reliable enough and gave no problems in the hot Egyptian climate”.
Heresay, rumour, unsubstantiated. Not an official record breaking attempt. Official record making attempts were indeed made by the MiG-25 and it did reach Mach 3.2 – but with specially adapted E-155 variants. How often did the MiG-25 reach Mach 2.83 in Iraqi service against the Iranians, or against USAF F-15s from 1991 onwards?
No source is “proven” reliable ever. The best way to actually try understand something is press review, mixing many sources and pulling what makes sense out of the bull**** you read everywhere.
Nic
Exactly. The usual question is what bull**** (or non-bull****) people want to accept or not to accept, as the case may be. You cannot indoctrinate (or just simply inform/educate) people who have already made up their minds.
No standard F-106 can do M2.3 repeatedly, any better or more reliably than MiG-25 does M3.2;
Where is the evidence for this?
any standard front-line MiG-25RB can do M3.2; because aircraft can do so without any modification, can land safely afterwards, and fly again.
Where is your evidence for this? No MiG-25RB is going to be doing M3.2 carrying any bomb-load for sure.
I am not doubting that M2.3 for F-106 and M 2.83 for MiG-25 are almost never performed because of strain on the airframe and engine, although there may be cases in actual combat when they could be called upon to do so.
Question; is there a fuel tank for F-106’s internal bay? Perhaps solely for ferry purposes?
Don’t know about the F-106. But what about the F-22, F-35 and T-50, it would be a useful feature, wouldn’t it?
A fuel bladder in the internal munition bay could possibly be made in a hurry
The F-105 Thud rarely used its internal bomb bay for munitions in the Vietnam war – an internal fuel tank was often carried instead.
http://www.clubhyper.com/reference/f105/Interior%20belly%20tank.jpg
From this thread:http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?33482-ANY-INFO-ON-F-105-THUNDERCHIEF-BOMB-BAY
Dismiss the source when you can’t attack the points.
All sources of information should be dismissed out-of-hand until as such time as the source has proved itself to be reliable and reasonably unbiased – and not the other way around.
Then you call MiG-25 what? M3.2+ aircraft?
The first problem with pilot claims is that there is really NOTHING scientific about them. On STD DAY with standard engine trim (without Vmax) F-15A can only do M2.24 when clean. At 10 degrees below standard day, F-15A can do M2.45. Just 10 degrees celcius colder air increases top speed by M0.2+ Now we also know MiG-29 can do ~M2.32 on standard day, and I do claim MiG-29A is faster than F-15A. You say manual is wrong, and fill me with BS of pilot claims that F-15 did M2.5+ on some occasions. I don’t say they are lying (which is also a probability); F-15A can do it with ease even with conformal AAMs, when its on cold winter day when air -30 degrees. Then people take this discussion to another form of idiocy; “As MiG-25 can do M2.83, and F-15 can do M2.5, there is no real speed difference between them”. I will simply say F-15 at STD+10 degrees celcius tops out at M1.95, while MiG-25 did M3.2 on hot egypt deserts.
The other problem is some are naive enough to say “X is not actually a limit, as aircraft can exceed this”. By definition; if some value is limited below sth, it indicates exceeding it is possible, but dangerous and not allowed for some reason. Going from the same ratio above; Su-27 or MiG-29 can easily go M2.5+ given the air is cold enough, provided pilot is willing to exceed airframe limits, aircraft won’t explode if pilot tries this once or twice.
BTW there is no suprise F-106 beats F-4 when they are fully armed and flying with EFTs, according to their flight manuals.
No standard front-line MiG-25 could fly at Mach 3.2 – any standard non-adapted USAF F-106 should be able to do Mach 2.3 – I think that’s the point – regardless as to what is written in their flight manuals.
At M 2.83 the MiG-25 is alleged to have a combat radius of of only 300 km or so – so around 600+ km range. But at lower supersonic speeds the range of the MiG-25 rapidly improves – at Mach 2 the MiG should have excellent range.
The actual top speed of the F-106 is irrelevant anyway. Such a high speed, long-range passenger sortie would not be carried out at speeds above Mach 2 anyway – what is the range of the F-106 flying at Mach 2 compared to Mach 2.3?
keep’em coming, i want to know all there is to know about the F-106
WOW, a very rare F-106 thread on the Key forums, or so it seems – keep it coming…
The Mi-28 is almost as stealthy as the Mil Mi-12
low alt & daylight = risk
high alt night strikes = minimal risk
If you are flying a high-altitude mission profile, it probably won’t make any difference whether it is day or night (medium range radar-guided SAMs work the same 24 hours a day): Night time might be a problem for fighters with poor BVR capabilities (I mean the fighters defending airspace against strike missions)?